GNU bug report logs -
#44068
28.0.50; Faulty uses of tabulated-list-format
Previous Next
Reported by: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:01:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Merged with 41861
Found in versions 27.0.91, 28.0.50
Done: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
> Cc: 44068 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:20:16 +0200
>
> > Instead of manually fine-tuning each column's width, wouldn't it be
> > better to use the string-trim capabilities that replace excess
> > characters with an ellipsis?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. If you mean to truncate the
> column label in the header line when displaying the sort indicator,
> e.g. change "Status" to "Sta… ▼", I'm dubious it's worth the effort,
> since most of the problematic cases in the Emacs sources are with the
> final column, where there's always enough space, but due to the
> misleading description in tabulated-list-format's doc string, many modes
> have made it unnecessarily narrow, preventing the display of the sort
> indicator. So to avoid the final column being labelled e.g. either
> "File" or "Fi… ▼" instead of "File ▼", it is necessary to change the
> width manually anyway. In other words, the truncation proposal would be
> an addition to manual fine-tuning (for non-final columns), not a
> substitute for it. Or did you mean something else?
Yes, I meant it as an addition, which will make this issue much more
future proof. Documentation update is definitely fine (and should
probably go to emacs-27, not to master, right?), and adjusting the
column widths to eliminate the ellipsis is also okay. I just don't
want us to end with these two and nothing else.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 270 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.