From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 15 18:21:59 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2020 22:21:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTBdH-0000ks-AF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:21:59 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36240) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTBdG-0000kk-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:21:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTBdF-0007Cb-Ks for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:21:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:37421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTBdB-0000Hm-5o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:21:56 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id j136so683102wmj.2 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:21:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rvAk2wbA5LPrOWldk4ufbpeiVfbwDm5AcxW+j2HDOPg=; b=XZah2hKNRWnZWDfnHJ1H1ozEC5+UHzW7H1O2u21So8Okmoc4Z0NMiEyV02CvoiUiTU G1Pmf6uCYul/xHnocKVyikCMSTZic2/Df3Zh/jBqbRqqdQolAS8x3YqcPl/qkkrYMvq9 9fASWop+61XPk0Cz/pZJsbPSLfav02MsoFwOOiPrpgytOXehBXBe1O3g0BHl0MYNu8MH PBtqylRL+4uW5mUhR6/ciizQdkkMZZ1iD8vqrYyIXQDFQUVE/aqhMsAjdvlv19xfFdSR k/+/KvsT7Toijg2RT0JYotdQoHskl31q1yJgsKj5wET4v9cdagKWhINfVtyGGkXFw3ka zwZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rvAk2wbA5LPrOWldk4ufbpeiVfbwDm5AcxW+j2HDOPg=; b=X+mA+4NA72FZvHnbV8TjB5+PlwiGj7dDUmrqrrhM4Ca5oi3+/o/yMG1MWt2jzGoE67 9zksWcqWTsGPSQPWV8Yc7oUkWBfzte4Dso5tdBf5ZDzJwpodoK9S289jOB9FiuLQ3WWX grUuQ7cLXpX/4yV8n2ea1haMgBV1pH9gp2IXBjTke3ar7CqmLsQ1pHM0mLb3frkA09Zt kGrVlinr02yh54dt2OPAHuLyXgEIumv7sQsXAVjK8yI5hWExZpdhcy+P5PB89Bj35KBq zNU3+oRD00q2AQd140ZvSqjvWQIUXsZIhfFlEMLf4itg1nqr9QuyWqiG69cWnhibNct/ NrdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PjsOE9Z4dI78PYDcwm7ASFso6QQl2xo1sqRSdviiQyTRPA7bV x25jb3iXlOIQjgPcwGgT3yh2PizyGuw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU+yUdTxkJktO5kl0wrNJD8tBSMnvgHmye+OldYyKhQw3WMoiyhqOp+3osoIgFJ7n8QDHTQA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2e0d:: with SMTP id u13mr682381wmu.179.1602800508414; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x4sm978403wrt.93.2020.10.15.15.21.47 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:21:47 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: haunt incompatible with package guix Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:21:46 +0200 Message-ID: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Dear, Is it possible to keep the compatibility between the package =E2=80=99haunt= =E2=80=99 and the package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99? Otherwise, building guix-artwork/websi= te takes ages, raises a lot of warnings=E2=80=A6 and makes me unhappy. :-) The issue is that haunt is currently built with guile@3.0.2 and the package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99 with guile@3.0.4. Therefore, =E2=80=99haunt= build=E2=80=99 claims: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /gnu/store/jkxwzw8dimbmbqqy12744wr3n2vxc= lnv-profile/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed: ;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /home/simon/.config/guix/profiles/emacs/= emacs/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed: ;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /home/simon/.config/guix/profiles/emacs/= emacs/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed: --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The easy fixes is to replace =E2=80=9Cguile-3.0=E2=80=99 by =E2=80=99guile-= 3.0-latest=E2=80=99 in the inputs of =E2=80=99haunt=E2=80=99. However, =E2=80=98guix build haunt=E2= =80=99 says: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- wrote `haunt/config.go' ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 ;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable. ;;; compiling /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4/bin/g= uild ;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-gui= le-3.0.4/bin/guild failed: ;;; failed to create path for auto-compiled file "/gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy2= 3rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4/bin/guild" GEN haunt/asset.go =E2=80=A6=20=20 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- stripping binaries in "/gnu/store/ncva9mpxc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.= 2.4/lib" with "strip" and flags ("--strip-debug" "--enable-deterministic-ar= chives") strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file `/gnu/store/ncva9mp= xc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.2.4/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/haunt/asset= .go' warning: /gnu/store/ncva9mpxc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.2.4/lib/guile/= 3.0/site-ccache/haunt/asset.go: program "strip" exited with non-zero exit s= tatus 1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- ending with =E2=80=9Csuccessfully built /gnu/store/p088xcmwksb8gkkqiwzwc3v9= r3cmjnrs-haunt-0.2.4.drv=E2=80=9D and an apparently working haunt =E2=80=93=E2=80=93 at least the website builds wit= hout warning and seems rendering correctly. Well, does it make sense to drag gnu/packages/package-management.scm in guile-xyz.scm? and then replace with something like: (inputs `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile")))) Or create a haunt variant named =E2=80=99haunt-guix=E2=80=99 keeping the co= mpatibility? Since I am not a haunt user, I do not have an opinion. All the best, simon PS: I am locally building the website time to time when hacking on the file =E2=80=99sources.json=E2=80=99 used by SWH. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 16 10:30:24 2020 Received: (at 44025) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2020 14:30:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTQkS-0005E2-AJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:30:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTQkQ-0005Dm-Ez for 44025@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:30:23 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTQkL-0000LL-6t; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:30:17 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37578 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kTQkH-00026X-AN; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:30:15 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix References: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:30:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:21:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87pn5i5jm4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44025 Cc: 44025@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zimoun skribis: > Well, does it make sense to drag gnu/packages/package-management.scm in > guile-xyz.scm? and then replace with something like: > > (inputs > `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile")))) > > > Or create a haunt variant named =E2=80=99haunt-guix=E2=80=99 keeping the = compatibility? Can we do that, but keep that variant in the web site=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98.g= uix.scm=E2=80=99 file? Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 17 20:05:42 2020 Received: (at 44025) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 00:05:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTwCk-0004iz-6e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:05:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:36016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTwCi-0004il-14 for 44025@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:05:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id e2so9203468wme.1 for <44025@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LJFUiAA7Yu6FrDJHpBq9F7quOf0/VabWREX/u+lxovE=; b=mrpJa8ZI+l2nPP3Qsau2neXGLIP09HtR9NAlSCNGlsIbFm2Cakt5lYEnmr0LdjMHqy 2CZU1kX9KjZfg83n49LqOUQoSDpfN2lD/wkNWLPdOUtoe1aAojIiU/fI0p2hJJEdaLS2 OkQqvFIhLwFKSjqs1pAF1s/v6AR2OJB4Z/PZ2n+TQLqb51Rzsmg0COwvKy8jan1lz9qu PyAVYSiNdCmtUNoGg5isj7FYPkuTfeSIbrWC51DW4WEcrnUHRucU9J7MHKQedNh7GyYs wIbOa9FnK0gnHnOnD4JXefKFKW2U11LJoj3IUdXoJf8Jn15q8qQuVvMuVNLjYb8b01ff kTmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LJFUiAA7Yu6FrDJHpBq9F7quOf0/VabWREX/u+lxovE=; b=k7VhcpO8EPOFee4Ls0taHpqxL8Z1it9Fka+xw3Ms3dQc3t0CI6A6bxoke0JQneIvFS z5XwJ/WYIekyYpyM+cp6IdPDnLTA0bBW3QyO4M1CcGTvnImJbyvlbo3vgjr+6Zs9bL0S njVEGIUl+sqxxmtQswneiu47YZwdQdx0/JmAf4EeT9DsRhRB5ebrOzrGn8BFZ5MgwZ6f 6d1x7gezHG+ONuPBrRMv2rx7o6svAy8J6CTNhxja2iiVxyagVTNcdcTgBT1NealMx4my pNvXo7wHJEzmAev3wTBHYVQSAeUE30VKbDvqOoXZuuX80HOAwIApQmpsEZ9FRz+a3svQ I94g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WO8d133RWJ/28sJgC9XI8H78e6/qnH3qUSQsDnp14s/vq1QnB XQjnCpAVDGhQ4kz47YTA7ruZUV63g6Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMVKBTtmqAjXJdNQFTJpA3JQtQ8DOkcbZq87t71kRAML+pFMOO3xypEE5OoaKPxS74ke7Wvw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e444:: with SMTP id b65mr11020863wmh.65.1602979533973; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16sm11091064wrx.31.2020.10.17.17.05.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:05:33 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix In-Reply-To: <87pn5i5jm4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> <87pn5i5jm4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 02:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: <86ft6c9z5f.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44025 Cc: 44025@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 16:30, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> (inputs >> `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile")))) >> >> >> Or create a haunt variant named =E2=80=99haunt-guix=E2=80=99 keeping the= compatibility? > > Can we do that, but keep that variant in the web site=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98= .guix.scm=E2=80=99 > file? My proposal to fix the annoyance is #44051. The variant is created in the manifest file. Since I am not using =E2=80=99.guix.scm=E2=80=99, I hav= e not looked into. Next round, after v1.2. :-) Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 21 13:27:53 2020 Received: (at 44025-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 17:27:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50448 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHtx-0007xk-Bo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:27:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:44640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHtw-0007xX-1a for 44025-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:27:52 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id t9so3925381wrq.11 for <44025-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jgJ/4YcfAr+M5YsZlqD8Oo3qgGflp6xEfJuS1iy8qI0=; b=E0Zon+VxDIXHA4AS+eT1MkAcCBbsow1PupBO6AeGx7VcBdoIp0+Lt1YEkBjnS71RP/ r1ndUyHeGLKodXy9y5QaGWczsVctz2tdacM/Ap+RVqsKSW4fdanZD7+8nHV3NFSzNR16 cbNcw2HZ8r8u42BRIDx1mEdUkJ+u1U0ihTdLW6rKJmitAvY7n6xtq1Fqg+iTDpc1SL9+ uv5SWbLOHqMVOMVd4zzDJGYCEF9NCKpUqun/i6uPOXPkXNzW+i31MNFCL6md/9FRO2YV RVlG8o+2eGwdVWNQ8vyVrYzliqFs9v45deEbcDk34+kN1pxgpfBnXFqj0/sB9HJn0ZL3 xVzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jgJ/4YcfAr+M5YsZlqD8Oo3qgGflp6xEfJuS1iy8qI0=; b=ZDzzE2DRvxH1nINiZi599APyrB7e1vxhPPTS9uXdIuFT4SWtSy/lh+hszecTUTDcv4 ysNdfN4SR9XHLJfDBNltqy63Rbekopk1nFMO72ynH6lalkD5ed4Y1Om2STaiOATNYMYj hIaL6UWNdmv87ttWB18d/Oj3vdSbiyeNxWerA6glBeczQpYORbZtpIhoqRabR0Fhds0G Y6DD8zaHw6tFzFd8wAzsSXHegzbAGP4rlhx3z/Yy/Iy8F5cDTafO7j2kvUCTQgfUXGPZ y2oj6+h2jlEvlwOup8z7NSKDh2LNFBEwSJFykWLuSIMTlsbOgJzTiD5LBNS5HGajKObn Ofzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RODetQN+V+Smrj1wHakGhsvB4Dv5xzn+hzTWfNtg+jCnXXlAi +Fi+q8wZiHVXj5RS2cbn4wXC9xCD+NY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSRcM+ceJPfxD817FqZ9Q5f7Bo1Wr4vK5JvAkkQPsMwlAfFUekjrHZ01cZnloH39ZejwgDuQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568a:: with SMTP id f10mr5755400wrv.30.1603301265909; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm5059037wrm.65.2020.10.21.10.27.45 for <44025-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: 44025-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix References: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:27:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86v9fbyvt1.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:21:46 +0200") Message-ID: <877drjfq0f.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44025-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 00:21, zimoun wrote: > Is it possible to keep the compatibility between the package =E2=80=99hau= nt=E2=80=99 and > the package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99? Otherwise, building guix-artwork/web= site takes > ages, raises a lot of warnings=E2=80=A6 and makes me unhappy. :-) > > The issue is that haunt is currently built with guile@3.0.2 and the > package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99 with guile@3.0.4. Therefore, =E2=80=99hau= nt build=E2=80=99 claims: The fix is applied to the =E2=80=99guix-artwork=E2=80=99 repo, see [1]. 1: Closing! From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:24:44 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator