GNU bug report logs - #44025
haunt incompatible with package guix

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 44025 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 44025 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: haunt incompatible with package guix
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:21:46 +0200

Dear,

Is it possible to keep the compatibility between the package ’haunt’ and
the package ’guix’?  Otherwise, building guix-artwork/website takes
ages, raises a lot of warnings… and makes me unhappy. :-)

The issue is that haunt is currently built with guile <at> 3.0.2 and the
package ’guix’ with guile <at> 3.0.4.  Therefore, ’haunt build’ claims:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /gnu/store/jkxwzw8dimbmbqqy12744wr3n2vxclnv-profile/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /home/simon/.config/guix/profiles/emacs/emacs/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /home/simon/.config/guix/profiles/emacs/emacs/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/ci.go failed:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


The easy fixes is to replace “guile-3.0’ by ’guile-3.0-latest’ in the
inputs of ’haunt’.  However, ‘guix build haunt’ says:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
wrote `haunt/config.go'
;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;;       or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
;;; compiling /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4/bin/guild
;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4/bin/guild failed:
;;; failed to create path for auto-compiled file "/gnu/store/ah16zr8mmfkqy23rr7jy5a842ca1q9h1-guile-3.0.4/bin/guild"
  GEN      haunt/asset.go
…  
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
stripping binaries in "/gnu/store/ncva9mpxc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.2.4/lib" with "strip" and flags ("--strip-debug" "--enable-deterministic-archives")
strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file `/gnu/store/ncva9mpxc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.2.4/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/haunt/asset.go'
warning: /gnu/store/ncva9mpxc1ypkmvy8a0xxvldpzap5j29-haunt-0.2.4/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/haunt/asset.go: program "strip" exited with non-zero exit status 1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

ending with “successfully built /gnu/store/p088xcmwksb8gkkqiwzwc3v9r3cmjnrs-haunt-0.2.4.drv” and an
apparently working haunt –– at least the website builds without warning
and seems rendering correctly.


Well, does it make sense to drag gnu/packages/package-management.scm in
guile-xyz.scm? and then replace with something like:

    (inputs
     `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile"))))


Or create a haunt variant named ’haunt-guix’ keeping the compatibility?


Since I am not a haunt user, I do not have an opinion.


All the best,
simon

PS:
I am locally building the website time to time when hacking on the file
’sources.json’ used by SWH.

Message #8 received at 44025 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 44025 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:30:11 +0200

Hi,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Well, does it make sense to drag gnu/packages/package-management.scm in
> guile-xyz.scm? and then replace with something like:
>
>     (inputs
>      `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile"))))
>
>
> Or create a haunt variant named ’haunt-guix’ keeping the compatibility?

Can we do that, but keep that variant in the web site’s ‘.guix.scm’
file?

Thanks!

Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 44025 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 44025 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 02:05:32 +0200

Hi,

On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 16:30, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>>     (inputs
>>      `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile"))))
>>
>>
>> Or create a haunt variant named ’haunt-guix’ keeping the compatibility?
>
> Can we do that, but keep that variant in the web site’s ‘.guix.scm’
> file?

My proposal to fix the annoyance is #44051.  The variant is created in
the manifest file.  Since I am not using ’.guix.scm’, I have not looked
into.  Next round, after v1.2. :-)

<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44051>


Cheers,
simon

Message #16 received at 44025-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: 44025-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44025: haunt incompatible with package guix
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:27:44 +0200

On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 00:21, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible to keep the compatibility between the package ’haunt’ and
> the package ’guix’?  Otherwise, building guix-artwork/website takes
> ages, raises a lot of warnings… and makes me unhappy. :-)
>
> The issue is that haunt is currently built with guile <at> 3.0.2 and the
> package ’guix’ with guile <at> 3.0.4.  Therefore, ’haunt build’ claims:

The fix is applied to the ’guix-artwork’ repo, see [1].

1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44051#1>

Closing!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.