GNU bug report logs - #43976
[PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 43976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43976 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#43976] [PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:22:54 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:12:41 +0100
raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:45:43 +0100
> raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:51:17 +0100
> > raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> >   
> > > Possibly more important: I noticed some warnings in some builds
> > > about cp(1). So far it hasn't caused any issues. Gonna fix this,
> > > then I think it'll be mergeable.    
> > 
> > Seems to be a srfi-18 specific issue, so I'm calling
> > chicken-build-system final for now. You can merge it if it stands up
> > to a review.
> > The other eggs also seem fine, srfi-18 just has a somewhat shoddily
> > written auxiliary build script to generate some type information,
> > probably based on the current Chicken version? I'm not sure what
> > it's doing to be honest. It doesn't fail to build because the script
> > doesn't check for errors, which is why it took a while to notice it.
> > 
> > This is why we always `set -e` in our Bash scripts, kids.
> > 
> > Anyways, all other eggs seem to be fine, and none of them depend on
> > srfi-18.  
> 
> Forgot to actually send the modified patch :D
> The others should be unchanged.

*facepalm* i somehow messed up the parens in that one. maybe i didn't
have Paredit on or something??? here's the fixed version.
but yeah, with this, it should be complete.

[0001-gnu-Added-search-paths-for-Chicken-Scheme.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.