Subject: bug#43961: read carefully: dired-file-name-at-point vs dired-filename-at-point

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:54:31 +0200

Boruch Baum <[email-masked]> writes:

> They return different values. One returns an expanded (canonical)
> path-name, and the other an abbreviated one.

Why not just have one call the other, and wrap the results in
abbreviate-file-name?

(And then mark it as obsolete, since it doesn't seem very useful.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no