GNU bug report logs -
#43960
incompatible bytecode version
Previous Next
Reported by: Дмитрий Поляков <liltechdude <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:22:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2021 01:18:14 -0500
with message-id <87ee7ac9qx.fsf_-_ <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#43960: incompatible bytecode version
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43960,
regarding incompatible bytecode version
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
43960: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43960
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
/run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/gnu/packages/mtools.go
failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
/gnu/store/kn4sqrhnbklqii9ac0xbljkhwg3p2g1m-guix-module-union/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix.go
failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
/run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix.go failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
/gnu/store/kn4sqrhnbklqii9ac0xbljkhwg3p2g1m-guix-module-union/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/monad-repl.go
failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
;;; WARNING: loading compiled file
/run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache/guix/monad-repl.go
failed:
;;; In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
Backtrace:
19 (_ #<procedure 7f562e23f6c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:330:13 ()> …)
18 (_ #<procedure 7f562e23f3e0 at ice-9/eval.scm:330:13 ()> …)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
191:27 17 (_ #(#(#<directory (guix store) 7f5643a77000> #<pr…>) …))
196:35 16 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (guix store) 7f5643a77000> …) #) #))
298:34 15 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (guix channels) 7f563d5da140>) …) …))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2806:4 14 (save-module-excursion _)
152:2 13 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In unknown file:
12 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/72dq02lisz4w74iphp4a8agjsp0…")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
626:19 11 (_ #<directory (build-self) 7f563c4778c0>)
293:34 10 (_ #<directory (build-self) 7f563c4778c0>)
293:34 9 (_ #(#(#<directory (gnu packages) 7f563f504640>) "gu…" …))
619:8 8 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (gnu packages) 7f563f504640>) …) #))
626:19 7 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (gnu packages) 7f563f504640>) …) #))
293:34 6 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (guix memoization) 7f5643…> …) …) …))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1731:15 5 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7f56238671b0 at ic…> …)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 4 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (gnu packages) 7f563f504640> #)) #))
626:19 3 (_ #(#(#(#<directory (gnu packages) 7f563f504640> #)) #))
In unknown file:
2 (load-compiled/vm "/home/lil/.config/guix/current/lib/g…")
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1669:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: incompatible bytecode version
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:53, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> I don’t think it’s a reasonable response: it’s a fact that we naturally
>> tend to read manuals sparsely, at best.
>>
>> Since the pastes vanished, how did ‘sudo guix pull’ lead to incompatible
>> bytecode warnings?
>
> If I remember correctly (which is neither a reasonable response :-)), it
> should highly come from the user config. And the investigation needs
> more information, e.g., as Tobias asks: the output of:
>
> $ type guix
> $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/current
> $ sudo rm ~/.config/guix/current
> $ /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix pull
> $ hash guix
> $ type guix
Yes, and we haven't gotten any of that information in a year.
Дмитрий, I'll close this old report which I don't see actionable, but if
you get hit by the problem again, it'd be helpful if you could capture
the above detail and what led you to the problem.
Thanks!
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 184 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.