GNU bug report logs - #43960
incompatible bytecode version

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Дмитрий Поляков <liltechdude <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:22:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #23 received at 43960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Дмитрий Поляков
 <liltechdude <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#43960:
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:47:30 +0200

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:53, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I don’t think it’s a reasonable response: it’s a fact that we naturally
> tend to read manuals sparsely, at best.
>
> Since the pastes vanished, how did ‘sudo guix pull’ lead to incompatible
> bytecode warnings?

If I remember correctly (which is neither a reasonable response :-)), it
should highly come from the user config.  And the investigation needs
more information, e.g., as Tobias asks: the output of:

  $ type guix
  $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/current
  $ sudo rm ~/.config/guix/current
  $ /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix pull
  $ hash guix
  $ type guix

All the best,
simon
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 185 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.