GNU bug report logs - #43890
‘package-input-rewriting/spec’ can introduce unnecessary variants

Previous Next

Full log

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: ‘package-input-rewriting/spec’ can
 introduce unnecessary variants
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:14:08 +0200

Consider this example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix describe
Generacio 162	Oct 01 2020 00:23:38	(nuna)
  guix 7607ace
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 7607ace5091aea0157ba5c8a508129cc5fc4f931
$ guix build inkscape --no-grafts -d
/gnu/store/arjs5hb4wmy6dh5d3y8bbs808ki9abf8-inkscape-1.0.1.drv
$ guix build inkscape --no-grafts -d --with-graft=glib=glib-networking
/gnu/store/zd8mm3w6x9c97anfaly77fz28s5y3i5h-inkscape-1.0.1.drv
$ guix build inkscape --no-grafts -d --with-graft=libreoffice=abiword
/gnu/store/arjs5hb4wmy6dh5d3y8bbs808ki9abf8-inkscape-1.0.1.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The last one is fine: it has no effect.

The second one is problematic: since we’re using ‘--no-grafts’, the
‘--with-graft’ option should have absolutely no effect; yet, it yields a
different derivation.

On closer inspection, we see that the core issue is that
‘gobject-introspection’ in the second case ends up with ‘libffi’ twice
in its ‘*-guile-builder’ script, a problem similar to
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/38100>.  (‘libffi’ is propagated by both
‘glib’ and ‘gobject-introspection’.)

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.