GNU bug report logs - #43881
[PATCH 0/2] Deduplicate package sets

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:41:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43881: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Deduplicate package sets)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 07:57:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:55:51 +0300
with message-id <20201015075551.GE1237 <at> E5400>
and subject line Re: [PATCH 1/2] system: Add %base-packages-disk-utils.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43881,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Deduplicate package sets
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
43881: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43881
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Deduplicate package sets
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2020 16:39:17 +0300
I noticed that the installer has nano, zile and nvi, but %base-packages
has nano and zile. I also saw that the installer also pulls in
%base-packages and I figured it was a good time to do something about
it.

I moved nvi from the installer to %base-packages-interactive.
I created %base-packages-disk-utils to work with
disks/partitions/file-systems.

Of the packages I removed from the installer which weren't already part
of %base-packages:
wpa-supplicant-minimal: wpa-supplicant already provided by the
wpa-supplicant-service-type.
openssh: Already provided by the openssh-service-type.

I figure it's worth asking: should we be using wpa-supplicant-minimal
and openssh-sans-x for their services in the installer? Actually,
looking at the openssh-service-type I don't see it documented in the
manual a field to use a different openssh package.

Efraim Flashner (2):
  system: Add %base-packages-disk-utils.
  install: Deduplicate packages with %base-package sets.

 gnu/system.scm         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 gnu/system/install.scm | 37 ++++++++++---------------------------
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: 43881-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] system: Add %base-packages-disk-utils.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:55:51 +0300
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Patches pushed!


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.