From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 19:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160201324431133 (code B ref -1); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 19:41:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2020 19:40:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPspI-000864-3C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:40:44 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPspE-00085v-TQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:40:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPspE-0005is-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:40:40 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::236]:46774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPspC-00062W-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:40:40 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id c21so3113418ljn.13 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=6wxJQ4JpK7e3+XkaXY4DEx93zFtCaxcJgh5RKUXvAyI=; b=BNtdqMozr+9G1fjRgDL6noWkSg1jRIFQXO5pqPzNVYB9EKjbE8ivgc4SzI1qAiB05t rboQHHYgbEZ/S9FrJyJK9K8PMBsg+sgjvHpGphhPP+UFCNqLzZVgsvoRIVXwvhypg/Zj idu/S3bfgGZ4euCQxoL1+nQ2Wj88UOi1YEw3ow5OoJ6gCEW5yY0d5kFMbr5UPsdMcl5o eCUp5wWH5Y/tTV2SuddGfyteFBLpsXXMvdsNPeHBg3RR+doW0c2ZjDUkyiqmmptXs3xj FUk9kgbR9jC67catOapvwcE+8wtFQZbumck5PoXB2e7ijLhEG6ZqGb4xiATzPkfSplvs EcvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=6wxJQ4JpK7e3+XkaXY4DEx93zFtCaxcJgh5RKUXvAyI=; b=ZMnECBFvkFWAnhZaC6e7MRu/6aaI46ISkQkhQ8rL8hfL97kLOdnQePmZ/OY18voR0i Qp4gsWudYCWzdOINDp+dtOhDJ7siLFy4YglrYYK3xN/CqzfuIa+ZWYla7X0+YBN+DwXC jMVMkh7SDngof6fnaFiavVFHfeAiYogg3R1ZhK8qHGSkQ2dLAzjlPfQ1XoxEr4cWDuYy qT9zZJS2pMLtFAszmXsux7Un6vlV/hhgzquWqjnkBzGcf9ZyNw8QBW1/RV0nPTWF6L8n v4lgX/M7EkryigwhSxEF2noDMD6jh0+1F3iypFWnmyBKHQ/QlnRRIb6nCnFXyAGEZBaB IY1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53019Xodkbwb34mU1uHeeCswYBi5SBUKtgnk1QwvdN/IX045JNZZ ssPNAO20n9r+d7HP9f3J3NM/LxrLMSY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL/3OQai8pbaMZvZdZp5BrabKkEUpic+kaKE/BN1+vhaGEX3ILE0Rvm3ZbONnTl3dtD0nCBg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a58e:: with SMTP id m14mr2459168ljp.375.1602013236102; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14sm840878ljm.126.2020.10.06.12.40.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:40:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrii Kolomoiets Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 22:40:33 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::236; envelope-from=andreyk.mad@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x236.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) In 'emacs -Q': 1. M-: (setq test-frame (make-frame '((left . 50) (top . 50)))) 2. C-x 5 o 3. M-: (set-face-background 'internal-border "blue" test-frame) 4. M-: (modify-frame-parameters test-frame '((background-color . "black"))) Now (face-background 'internal-border test-frame) returns nil. If we skip step 2, then the internal border color remains. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 2, x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0, NS appkit-1894.60 Version 10.15.6 (Build 19G2021)) Windowing system distributor 'Apple', version 10.3.1894 System Description: Mac OS X 10.15.6 From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 20:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrii Kolomoiets Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.16020166483841 (code B ref 43837); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 20:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2020 20:37:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54261 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPtiC-0000zs-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:37:28 -0400 Received: from wilbur.contactoffice.com ([212.3.242.68]:35978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPtiA-0000zT-AU for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:37:27 -0400 Received: from smtpauth1.co-bxl (smtpauth1.co-bxl [10.2.0.15]) by wilbur.contactoffice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A590411D8; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 22:37:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1602016639; s=20200222-6h9o; d=idiocy.org; i=alan@idiocy.org; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; l=1988; bh=L3cP3uei9ZxmTJm9Tvyvf6w/az2neL2oNFarQCQn6z4=; b=msqRnOWcsuBzWMpjqx/jYaf+jZ9+bZcO7ubyRPvMk0R4wcuehGivf5Ps9fW/JIxA +kVv5793wjX/MQvCswnM/JO6jA6YC0MmwKzC+Vy0K6qLV9qOHnrBhkGT9yN1zHm/shu TzgOReo3ob6ikh4kamG/FP28NN73mM3P61/hbx4kWluBpyjh6LWJFw4uiPCXV8sc3Ob s0xnyTkvto9Kw0cUQZi538G9e8CzQ60Wo0MERtXCqXL8lzqqw5nBSYXVyRC1TJj40Ln LRLY8E1WWGj6K112oyK74m5RoCEWjTuLRzkbAS5tslsnjdlhUZ6/K38vGnMC7EiSEdw 1i5Zlv1/JQ== Received: by smtp.mailfence.com with ESMTPA ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 22:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id B3A682025E342F; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100 From: Alan Third Message-ID: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Andrii Kolomoiets , 43837@debbugs.gnu.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=4.7 symbols=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_00 device=10.2.0.1 X-ContactOffice-Account: com:241649512 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:40:33PM +0300, Andrii Kolomoiets wrote: > In 'emacs -Q': > > 1. M-: (setq test-frame (make-frame '((left . 50) (top . 50)))) > 2. C-x 5 o > 3. M-: (set-face-background 'internal-border "blue" test-frame) > 4. M-: (modify-frame-parameters test-frame '((background-color . "black"))) > > Now (face-background 'internal-border test-frame) returns nil. > If we skip step 2, then the internal border color remains. This isn't an NS specific problem. Eli actually spotted the bug last year and put in a FIXME. I can't think of a good reason for the code to use the selected frame, but perhaps I'm missing something. Patch attached. -- Alan Third --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Prevent-mixing-of-faces-from-different-frames-bug-43.patch" >From b5f0e5a1c508a950a13941e15fc4bd1c1a63bceb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Third Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:32:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Prevent mixing of faces from different frames (bug#43837) * lisp/frame.el (frame-set-background-mode): Use the face spec from the frame that's the target of the function instead of the currently selected frame. --- lisp/frame.el | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/frame.el b/lisp/frame.el index 7751ae1303..26b23f8229 100644 --- a/lisp/frame.el +++ b/lisp/frame.el @@ -1247,10 +1247,7 @@ frame-set-background-mode (assq face (frame-face-alist)) (face-spec-match-p face (face-user-default-spec face) - ;; FIXME: why selected-frame and - ;; not the frame that is the - ;; argument to this function? - (selected-frame)))) + frame))) (push face locally-modified-faces))) ;; Now change to the new frame parameters (modify-frame-parameters frame params) -- 2.26.1 --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alan Third Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205318913336 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 06:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3DY-0003T2-Mb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:46:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com ([209.85.208.182]:41272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3DV-0003So-Vc for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:46:27 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id p15so833265ljj.8 for <43837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8ndmd27YS7okJ0+N1os8SxvGLRRYAPgyNMHyJ5wtTyM=; b=Gg10ujwsiHFRnvKCneyyuWzZ3p1MfjMeCYLyL1B7UfFU0VelR5de/SHYKyBxs0VSCf jio1ypKQx25EzCOIOUBxcmDRAeA9ImNDjsbiHrGpO/R/KK9OF2iIk8y5B2H6vOFqORHT B36ibDx1r6D1Op0aKKv5V67d7aOWGK1NcR1FIdTt6NiTl4wGEOQ0P1H4hvfHL34vcfTW HSngqIA/j7lV2XQSXrJtkFjA0kQbDlr/G9cpDbQELTtBbj1i/UJ52Br0Nsr98bhLcH79 ydWZp6Jm+yCvvOZLtO/v7mYoMaiJhi98xb4qXc0qSDo/CBxrKPSWR2HcV0JIey6N1AMb 9+bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8ndmd27YS7okJ0+N1os8SxvGLRRYAPgyNMHyJ5wtTyM=; b=m1heHsCJgb96ZOZ+a6ImCN4PAnhN1wYcEXrHhg13UrRoD/qhsbnDJncHrMjIOp9GY8 VITpNMoykeaEolp3SYhTpb91KJKClL/jQv/T8jy/yUDfbGWpHm2YoqjuqZs8WmMMdCgY nPK98NZh27vE1KP2/LpHS+wTmLUCtQL6PvNre8QUwJWpUudHu3RXza3ExzRNQAisQ92N DG3nQqtowsmtgMck+5oTyJS2mPftnBkvxk8YpEkkkHmbHJcjz5D8LL7xEW5yHOdhoh2h 4///qXxs4rFIryyWGJBZn6jSxjQKrX9AuASx6Y7Nlts+IKCl4B21mSgcd+hvlAqeIrPm B/GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XMHpVjgtLvOxlpzxgHF5fdigEsb8d+A3lmLcWVumYfafbUFMU wZlFgN9FAzfT6txA8mQ23ZsYyjQlW5k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTZ5w0BFuw/GmdlunNpp4oT5bYdlcdHfAwZTkIM6lgf0MlDWDuy6YSRWqHEkKdGBxgPzCHYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:216:: with SMTP id y22mr570900ljn.350.1602053179481; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm189343lfn.215.2020.10.06.23.46.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:46:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrii Kolomoiets References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:46:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> (Alan Third's message of "Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alan Third writes: > This isn't an NS specific problem. Eli actually spotted the bug last > year and put in a FIXME. Sorry, was too lazy to check on other OS :) > I can't think of a good reason for the code to use the selected frame, > but perhaps I'm missing something. > > Patch attached. Looks great and works perfect! From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrii Kolomoiets Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205422015007 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 07:03:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3UB-0003tz-Ot for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:03:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3U7-0003tl-HI for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:03:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3U2-0007RI-9h; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:03:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3U1-0001Yn-L1; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:03:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:03:34 +0300 Message-Id: <83imbma56h.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (message from Andrii Kolomoiets on Tue, 06 Oct 2020 22:40:33 +0300) References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrii Kolomoiets > Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 22:40:33 +0300 > > In 'emacs -Q': > > 1. M-: (setq test-frame (make-frame '((left . 50) (top . 50)))) > 2. C-x 5 o > 3. M-: (set-face-background 'internal-border "blue" test-frame) > 4. M-: (modify-frame-parameters test-frame '((background-color . "black"))) > > Now (face-background 'internal-border test-frame) returns nil. > If we skip step 2, then the internal border color remains. I think I fixed this on the master branch now. Thanks. From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alan Third Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org, andreyk.mad@gmail.com Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205517816545 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 07:19:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54974 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3je-0004In-LK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:19:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3jc-0004IZ-Dz for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:19:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3jW-0000ml-Lq; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:19:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3215 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3jV-0002tS-UM; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:19:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:19:35 +0300 Message-Id: <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> (message from Alan Third on Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100) References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100 > From: Alan Third > Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org > > > 1. M-: (setq test-frame (make-frame '((left . 50) (top . 50)))) > > 2. C-x 5 o > > 3. M-: (set-face-background 'internal-border "blue" test-frame) > > 4. M-: (modify-frame-parameters test-frame '((background-color . "black"))) > > > > Now (face-background 'internal-border test-frame) returns nil. > > If we skip step 2, then the internal border color remains. > > This isn't an NS specific problem. Eli actually spotted the bug last > year and put in a FIXME. It was me? > I can't think of a good reason for the code to use the selected frame, > but perhaps I'm missing something. Heh, I went through the rabbit hole and arrived at the same fix, now installed on master. Let's see what will it break, and then perhaps we will understand why the old code used selected-frame there... Thanks. From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Alan Third , 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205654618875 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 07:42:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ45i-0004uN-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:42:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:34738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ45e-0004u8-79 for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:42:25 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id u8so1192360lff.1 for <43837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lD7YJYdYWBuctxnFzLgrqbS4cZT4KycfBMwIwrCC+M0=; b=oxCpkNqc8iKmen0kNBQjR2qgCOlJTgeKZgHD8EF/YB/+/CmDJApliWPkhtE5Tv3zRY 8a8c7Zla7AZ+km8td5pvFBhnY4UJsHYb36AVtL8PNQ/8xbfo6FZC/jvGMWN0znhvkVzj S9TZQf9knH0u81c9K0qAeLwHmfI9ZKGCYIE77XtLMiv2epWxqfXnOFjeyRt8Z+b5aoz8 z3n5E/COok3BCci4Ya7OvVue2of2gePUxmuIY/fXsMBHtve+osJoQ5LsqADJjThO6ExA 1A4KuA6lXhJ5HY2vWvz5cR4AJU6JhU4QBii2c/C/FfWOCbf83A6M9Pzkxghwl/P8CcZr 6e3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lD7YJYdYWBuctxnFzLgrqbS4cZT4KycfBMwIwrCC+M0=; b=r6+HSzXNcgSg2CvsFzHpVRPQ+qiCVRy0uA6hDiq/RqRP4S+Cdji/mak735ATVQCpOX Sc0WoqkVv10CY2fVXKllusUUT9wAAY0hvw6bd5x4MPXRsgOIIB9fra8cvzN2mrB5KgRP wBVgDKE3l3+IscXudDYuY4TF5xZeZQ/5U4T9L3WzPVCODFMxQZkexvTmqSsQuabL5omS ghiqHHx6u3L9V4Nnq2Fpp9UpLLbU6zREdvE7klr+wg3/MRIOe4I0dVZ2E1k0Fk6u1oQO ABAZuS95LpinM+NsnkpwkbOXHxzDhP2RX3dpRvoFerDrRrWOfRcfVEreM8ykMSZ5UbqE S+mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AF0wXAdJmlvCZOO4X4F9Np9Ut1JbvDrKSxywAY9S8zoxJFC94 gubkTFHPwcy4L7gvK29EvekGo4qmpQk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypzQataPNJOKcBGKbsHzmvYhk8PnM/AOWBWovhzG0oB/LpJ2+lBWNmSE0+mzornFrK3h5KBw== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:560f:: with SMTP id v15mr629072lfd.550.1602056535693; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j19sm227855ljb.51.2020.10.07.00.42.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrii Kolomoiets References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:42:13 +0300 In-Reply-To: <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:19:35 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Alan Third >> I can't think of a good reason for the code to use the selected frame, >> but perhaps I'm missing something. > > Heh, I went through the rabbit hole and arrived at the same fix, now > installed on master. Let's see what will it break, and then perhaps > we will understand why the old code used selected-frame there... Well, with recent master: 1. M-: (custom-set-faces '(default ((t :foreground "white" :background "black")))) 2. C-x 5 2 And to fix the colors in the created frame: M-: (frame-set-background-mode (selected-frame)) From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrii Kolomoiets Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205925323218 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 08:27:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55136 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4nN-00062Q-Hk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:27:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4nL-00062D-Tr for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:27:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4nE-0000f3-Tg; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:27:24 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3414 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4nA-0007CL-Mt; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:27:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:27:25 +0300 Message-Id: <835z7ma1aq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (message from Andrii Kolomoiets on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:42:13 +0300) References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrii Kolomoiets > Cc: Alan Third , 43837@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:42:13 +0300 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Heh, I went through the rabbit hole and arrived at the same fix, now > > installed on master. Let's see what will it break, and then perhaps > > we will understand why the old code used selected-frame there... > > Well, with recent master: > > 1. M-: (custom-set-faces '(default ((t :foreground "white" :background "black")))) > 2. C-x 5 2 > > And to fix the colors in the created frame: > M-: (frame-set-background-mode (selected-frame)) So are you okay with reverting the fix and enduring the lesser problem we had before? From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org, andreyk.mad@gmail.com Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205957032034 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 08:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4sT-0008Kb-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:32:50 -0400 Received: from wilbur.contactoffice.com ([212.3.242.68]:35390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4sS-0008KI-J9 for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:32:49 -0400 Received: from smtpauth2.co-bxl (smtpauth2.co-bxl [10.2.0.24]) by wilbur.contactoffice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246F11A1; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1602059562; s=20200222-6h9o; d=idiocy.org; i=alan@idiocy.org; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; l=373; bh=hUSzJ+PNQHXkcQgkn2B96KpbZ+eEp8wL8UF06Iiv+dc=; b=UgBtpGzbvfyXZLZJkaivN30Ht/P+sxXbv0GnB8YMsRVQ0gmatEsHNbOcGFnRd27b +/UzPeBMj5RU8HP/vV0W5OdnsO26spHa6NEppU3W4rs+AwoWYOk6IzT3YzaRimx+L6C R1lRyvGexRhYLZCrrEjMQf6VYpxbaCcYIZSMQffwGjCGMKMwR1RlR/Oe6eI06vURIGQ +AzJSR08JlbqgIqfqnfbg2pnK58sVSPqcc2BDRJjS65mguBeBcEGfhr3WbA640+4nid RSgSOcRrVieO+uhLCfBlTPirwULwoI30XtTZY8j1ihM0gYZve1wkRjvk+qbtXnoTGzj 9C/TkCWZDg== Received: by smtp.mailfence.com with ESMTPA ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 42C682025E5B92; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:32:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:32:37 +0100 From: Alan Third Message-ID: <20201007083237.GE60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Eli Zaretskii , andreyk.mad@gmail.com, 43837@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=4.7 symbols=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_00 device=10.2.0.1 X-ContactOffice-Account: com:241649512 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:19:35AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:37:15 +0100 > > From: Alan Third > > Cc: 43837@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > This isn't an NS specific problem. Eli actually spotted the bug last > > year and put in a FIXME. > > It was me? Yup! 6a1dcf594a8b6aa72820f04b529aa3454cf3fc61 :) -- Alan Third From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: andreyk.mad@gmail.com Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160205988132561 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 08:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4xU-0008T7-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:38:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4xT-0008Sq-Mm for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:38:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4xO-00022I-1E; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:37:54 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4066 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4xN-0007oM-9O; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:37:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:37:59 +0300 Message-Id: <834kn6a0t4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <835z7ma1aq.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:27:25 +0300) References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> <835z7ma1aq.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:27:25 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 43837@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Andrii Kolomoiets > > Cc: Alan Third , 43837@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:42:13 +0300 > > > > 1. M-: (custom-set-faces '(default ((t :foreground "white" :background "black")))) > > 2. C-x 5 2 > > > > And to fix the colors in the created frame: > > M-: (frame-set-background-mode (selected-frame)) > > So are you okay with reverting the fix and enduring the lesser problem > we had before? Never mind, I fixed this now, I think. From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 43837@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.1602060365950 (code B ref 43837); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 08:46:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55204 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ55I-0000FF-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:46:04 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:34616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ55G-0000Eb-6g for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:46:04 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u8so1384218lff.1 for <43837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:46:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=yvVqg4mHYuSIOYOGchraMcl1fCTNXHWEMtU/ezPyUQU=; b=gocVOLAZhi8Ih8/8rkiwEPOD+0Znr6OWaeHtULolhdk6U1eeWaqpCnqXSZpT1IskAu XD3dFN8q7vtoWkZEqQ6j8VjGnQ7jXflY6wqRMEVcPjqcX1uBXW1sN28yeIxtZtJ5G8Af FyUx2L2YajGiPnmffLd61R/cZnBijFjAaCEuBvWue+Zq7LNwvt4p/xHOZtDkbMcH/wl3 qMv92hedDPkvbllG8mk8rtPLCVhjjATG2MXsW+5nmyeTa7UMZS7UcrPXb1WmoAJVwNgi ooCTYdA+erKg92pYrERQ8NzQkxHvkX1sld0yIgoMAunFU068p8chAwvtcU3IT9PrODb7 9w0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yvVqg4mHYuSIOYOGchraMcl1fCTNXHWEMtU/ezPyUQU=; b=W6Fd0no1InScDHgT/B15ITqueqaRFXieXzOySTMTr/DiGkZ92Ny3MRDUcdrj4H/Bp+ +0CVb66Np60HsquDEAmEmE7r+8WU9ReYc1jH07bZwmGa3AyrbCQ+YLqNST1668XOHEtB O0drsLs24+Yvw3vlecwW5tynEzm5bYVWI2Ws+P6MNRveUXnEUXiB3EfApsSEfw1gD2zI Ktyk0AARza8tuMLeN1CeZ5MA4fo3jquIPG1cLx9P0A6rnizdYuZhC0jpTD4hfjtwlI+L vYFdPu0oCVrKQmtefjv2ixhMvvI6fmfralwPQwUzhmbEmNOvSnr8BQDedoKzfjPkrkRN a5gw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ai4olcn5Xvc7Suj2Y7Ab295CoyJ9GIXg1hxRUNORcRJwXVz9A APKEBZ7lc/CSfiAXEzfQ+efbdmE2KwU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdtmnyvIVKOPZdPT/btqnGLxEuAqDaeHZ27z1tvQrDobsFwxxlRVucNIUyTsvF/FKmfAn2mw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:c3cf:: with SMTP id t198mr563255lff.461.1602060355516; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m203sm233641lfd.195.2020.10.07.01.45.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:45:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrii Kolomoiets References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> <835z7ma1aq.fsf@gnu.org> <834kn6a0t4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:45:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <834kn6a0t4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:37:59 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Never mind, I fixed this now, I think. Can confirm. Thanks! From unknown Thu Sep 11 04:20:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43837: 28.0.50; [NS] Internal border of inactive frame loses color Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrii Kolomoiets Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 43837@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org Received: via spool by 43837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43837.160302198228502 (code B ref 43837); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 43837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 11:53:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU7FG-0007PO-0b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 07:53:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47]:44420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU7FD-0007Ov-4O for 43837@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 07:52:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id t20so7357804edr.11 for <43837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:52:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6hNbr/ETdK2C4wDKTM8f6WIk0mdtLBeq5zSIk4krmbQ=; b=J5vy1vMHxfDwfH6wKZkznqTu54faMzqv7MOMsxpjEngnraePiB9DDafRg+BmxuHHDx 7PfKHbsWrsD+urj/12KWkt+DT6DblFczJapdyLsbzYISiKeE3bgG3gI7vNhh0ENxy7uc xDxRnoq+YW+S0NKIL6bDPUsWZLXH+ZrAvc5CeX2XclU+VaWP5x6xqtY+MiFo1MCOxEXM FsbNNAaMdeYXBbwmXD3mnHRbPAZzRdPqoz41By83F3RA68we2IRHGCWC3e2BQ5J8ojEj 7PFJvPd+g0A0RswmzKiEC0r9EV5MdNY/kBRGlKtp5arORiT3qtfv8+zH/gYS+rgZY1tR ey/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SvGWla758j04CSLhNPPnDLEGbcZeZeYrz5USpsB+PkadZ32ty AEwFgXD9n6bFeFvfbmcy7A99yP/b30R1ZqZDsjk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxEMFiw0iGNwwiaK10Iq+NHaeY3SOcyo+gsR7AyEZxxsd3Ax3qk4TWBihntX5WGmGthURD820RZH+43QxU5Kw= X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa42:: with SMTP id c2mr13680733edq.282.1603021973286; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:52:52 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (Andrii Kolomoiets's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:45:52 +0300") References: <20201006203715.GD60347@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83eemaa4fs.fsf@gnu.org> <835z7ma1aq.fsf@gnu.org> <834kn6a0t4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:52:52 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) close 43837 28.1 thanks Andrii Kolomoiets writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Never mind, I fixed this now, I think. > > Can confirm. It seems like this was fixed, but the bug was never closed. I'm therefore closing this bug report. If this conclusion is incorrect and this is still an issue, please reply to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report.