GNU bug report logs - #43820
27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 43820 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 43820 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:25:22 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

There's a missing full stop at the end of a paragraph in the MS-DOS
processes documentation. The attached patch fixes it.

[0001-Add-missing-full-stop-in-MS-DOS-processes-documentat.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>
Cc: 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes
 documentation
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 03:43:30 +0200

Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es> writes:

> There's a missing full stop at the end of a paragraph in the MS-DOS
> processes documentation. The attached patch fixes it.

Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #15 received at 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>
Subject: Re: bug#43820: 27.1;
 [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:07:43 -0400

Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).

Why not apply just to emacs-27, and let it get merged to master, per eg
CONTRIBUTE?

> close 43820 28.1

Why not 27.2?

(Is this enough nit picking for a "." I wonder...)

Message #18 received at 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43820 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>
Subject: Re: bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes
 documentation
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 04:28:42 +0200

Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).
>
> Why not apply just to emacs-27, and let it get merged to master, per eg
> CONTRIBUTE?

Because I had already applied it to Emacs 28 when that occurred to
me...  does cherry-picking make stuff harder for you when doing the
merges from emacs-27 to the trunk?

>> close 43820 28.1
>
> Why not 27.2?

Does anybody actually use those markings for anything?

> (Is this enough nit picking for a "." I wonder...)

I think it's the max!

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.