From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12524225314894 (code B ref -1); Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:15:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2009 15:08:51 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n88F8nN7004891 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:08:51 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:45085 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JN-0000ol-8l for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JL-0003xO-3P for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:48 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:58004 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JK-0003wu-NH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:46 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=robert-laptop.tnei.co.uk) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2ER-0003ar-FC for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:03:44 +0100 From: Robert Marshall To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:08:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators to read other languages for them. Your bug report will be posted to the emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org mailing list. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug: Maybe associated with the other gdb error I have just reported. If I run gud with --annotate=3 I get lots of pre-prompt and post-prompt output (perhaps this is to be expected), I kill the process with a signals KILL - off the pulldown menu) and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* buffer I get the message gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process and the buffer is not killed :-( Robert If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. If you would like to further debug the crash, please read the file /home/robert/emacs/etc/DEBUG for instructions. In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.16.1) of 2009-09-08 on robert-laptop Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10600000 Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Debugger Minor modes in effect: desktop-save-mode: t recentf-mode: t show-paren-mode: t tooltip-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE tel: +44 161 615 6017; fax: +44 161 615 6001; mobile: +44 7759 688384 web: http://IPSA-Power.com From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:55:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 4375-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4375.125245009528457 (code B ref 4375); Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:55:04 +0000 Received: (at 4375) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2009 22:48:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.25]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n88MmDoh028452 for <4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:48:15 -0700 Received: from totara (147.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.147]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8323DA928; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:07 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2A27C164; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:06 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:06 +1200 To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) > Maybe associated with the other gdb error I have just reported. > If I run gud with --annotate=3 > I get lots of pre-prompt and post-prompt output > (perhaps this is to be expected), I kill the process with a signals KILL > - off the pulldown menu) and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* > buffer I get the message > > gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process > > and the buffer is not killed :-( That does seem to be a bug, I have a look at it. However, Emacs 23.1.50 should run GDB using GDB/MI (gdb -i=mi) not annotations (gdb --annotate=3) so you shouldn't see any pre-prompt and post-prompt output. I don't know if you've customized gud-gdb-command-name or if your're manually editing in the mini-buffer but you need to start with something like: Run gdb (like this): gdb -i=mi yourprog and you shouldn't need to kill the debugger. Note that to stop the inferior (program being debugged) you use C-c C-c (comint-interrupt-subjob) which is signals BREAK on the pulldown menu. > ... > In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.16.1) > of 2009-09-08 on robert-laptop -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125248097628031 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:30:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 07:22:56 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n897MseQ028028 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:22:55 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:38449 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHW1-0008Kb-NA for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:22:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHVw-0005lq-Hm for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:22:53 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:8331) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHVv-0005lU-Mt for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:22:48 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119] helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHVu-0000Wf-PY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:22:47 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHQs-0005Io-IW; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:22:28 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Nick Roberts wrote: > > Maybe associated with the other gdb error I have just reported. > > If I run gud with --annotate=3 > > I get lots of pre-prompt and post-prompt output > > (perhaps this is to be expected), I kill the process with a signals KILL > > - off the pulldown menu) and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* > > buffer I get the message > > > > gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process > > > > and the buffer is not killed :-( > > That does seem to be a bug, I have a look at it. However, Emacs 23.1.50 > should run GDB using GDB/MI (gdb -i=mi) not annotations (gdb --annotate=3) > so you shouldn't see any pre-prompt and post-prompt output. I don't know > if you've customized gud-gdb-command-name or if your're manually editing > in the mini-buffer but you need to start with something like: > > Run gdb (like this): gdb -i=mi yourprog > > and you shouldn't need to kill the debugger. Note that to stop the inferior > (program being debugged) you use C-c C-c (comint-interrupt-subjob) which > is signals BREAK on the pulldown menu. > > > > ... > > In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.16.1) > > of 2009-09-08 on robert-laptop > Looks as if my earlier bug report hasn't appeared (the other bug was why I was trying --annotate) If I run with -i=mi I get lots of mi_cmd_stack_info_frame: No arguments required messages. Also if I try turning on tooltips when I hold the mouse over a variable I get the message error in process filter: Args out of range: "", 0, -1 There's also a longish wait on startup when it is turning off non stop mode and I see the message there No symbol "non" in current context. in the gdb buffer, I don't know if that is expected? If I then do a quit in the debugger I also get the message about the process not running. Robert -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE tel: +44 161 615 6017; fax: +44 161 615 6001; mobile: +44 7759 688384 web: http://IPSA-Power.com From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125248753314567 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:20:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 09:12:13 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n899CCVw014564 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:12:13 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:42500) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlJDn-0003OR-Dj for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:12:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlJDl-0005g8-Ae for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:12:10 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:33773) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlJDk-0005fZ-Ib for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:12:08 -0400 Received: from totara (61.27.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.27.61]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F8A3DA9C5; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:12:05 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C18EC164; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:12:02 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:12:00 +1200 To: Robert Marshall Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 > Looks as if my earlier bug report hasn't appeared (the other bug was why > I was trying --annotate) > If I run with -i=mi I get lots of > > mi_cmd_stack_info_frame: No arguments required > messages. Even if "-i=mi" doesn't work for you "--annotate" is not the answer. The mode in 23.1.50 really needs GDB 7.0, which han't been released yet! There used to be two GDB releases per year but the last was back in March of last year. It's hard to co-ordinate changes but the aim is for it to be released shortly. > Also if I try turning on tooltips when I hold the mouse over a > variable I get the message > > error in process filter: Args out of range: "", 0, -1 Yes I can see that this with GDB 7.0 - so that's another bug. Thanks for the report. > There's also a longish wait on startup when it is turning off non stop mode > and I see the message there > > No symbol "non" in current context. > in the gdb buffer, I don't know if that is expected? This is related to old GDB. Emacs enquires if it can run these versions of GDB in non-stop mode but can't prevent the display of the resultant error message because it is duplicated in the console output, which goes to the GUD buffer. > If I then do a quit in the debugger I also get the message about the > process not running. Hmm, I don't know but if you can get GDB 7.0 most (but not all) of these problems will clear up. If you need to use GDB in earnest it's probably best to use the released Emacs 23.1 which uses "--annotate". However, if you have some time, then I appreciate bug reports for Emacs 23.1.50. Ultimately this latter mode will be much better than the current one but it depends on users making bug reports because I don't use it that often now. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: "Jan D." , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125249292430223 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:50:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 10:42:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_NIX1 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89Ag2NV030216 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 03:42:03 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:46218 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKci-0006Js-Ux for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:42:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKch-0003sV-Ld for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:42:00 -0400 Received: from proxy2.bredband.net ([195.54.101.72]:36632) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKch-0003rx-AU for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:41:59 -0400 Received: from iph1.telenor.se (195.54.127.132) by proxy2.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 4A8FF71400699D66 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:41:57 +0200 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuhoAM8jp0pV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBU4g9kScBAQEBN8FHhBgF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,358,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="42788490" Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by iph1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2009 12:41:56 +0200 Received: from [90.232.222.50] (host-90-232-222-50.mobileonline.telia.com [90.232.222.50]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF3947FA07B; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:41:55 +0200 (CEST) References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> Message-Id: <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> From: "Jan D." To: Nick Roberts , "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A400) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A400) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:41:51 +0200 Cc: Robert Marshall , "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. 9 sep 2009 kl. 11.12 skrev nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts): >> Looks as if my earlier bug report hasn't appeared (the other bug >> was why >> I was trying --annotate) >> If I run with -i=mi I get lots of >> >> mi_cmd_stack_info_frame: No arguments required >> messages. > > Even if "-i=mi" doesn't work for you "--annotate" is not the > answer. The mode > in 23.1.50 really needs GDB 7.0, which han't been released yet! Are you saying that when 23.2 is released Gdb 7.0 will be required? Can the 23.1 gdb-mode work with 23.1.50? I'd really like to be able to debug with gdb-mode in the current CVS trunk. Installing Gdb 7.0 is not an option. Jan D. From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 4375-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4375.12524948454040 (code B ref 4375); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:20:03 +0000 Received: (at 4375) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 11:14:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.25]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89BE4HH004037 for <4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 04:14:05 -0700 Received: from totara (61.27.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.27.61]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16AC3DA9A4; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:14:03 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A697EC164; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:14:01 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:13:59 +1200 To: "Jan D." Cc: "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org>, Robert Marshall , "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) > > in 23.1.50 really needs GDB 7.0, which han't been released yet! > > Are you saying that when 23.2 is released Gdb 7.0 will be required? I had anticipated that 23.2 would be released from the EMACS_23_1_RC branch i.e. the branch on which Emacs 21.1 was released, as with Emacs 21.2 and Emacs 22.2. I must admit I've not followed discussion on emacs-devel closely. > Can the 23.1 gdb-mode work with 23.1.50? I'd really like to be able to > debug with gdb-mode in the current CVS trunk. Installing Gdb 7.0 is > not an option. If the release of 23.2 is imminent then I could temporarily move gdb-ui.el back from EMACS_23_1_RC for the release. It also has some new features, e.g. reverse debugging. Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:50:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12525072747896 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:50:05 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 14:41:14 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89EfCKf007890 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:41:13 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:50168) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOMB-0007d0-Ho for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:41:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOM9-0003cq-Qq for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:41:11 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:9920) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlOM9-0003cd-IT for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:41:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4EANlbp0pFpZBe/2dsb2JhbACBU904hBgFh20 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,358,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="45451719" Received: from 69-165-144-94.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.144.94]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2009 10:39:41 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 822229410; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:41:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Nick Roberts Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, "Jan D." , "emacs-pretest-bug\@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall Message-ID: References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:41:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:13:59 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. > If the release of 23.2 is imminent then I could temporarily move > gdb-ui.el back from EMACS_23_1_RC for the release. It also has some > new features, e.g. reverse debugging. Even if it's not imminent, it's likely that when it will happen many people will still be using older GDB releases. So it'd be good to keep the gdb-ui.el code for Emacs-23.2 (and include the new gdb-mi.el as well). BTW, as you probably already know, I really think that M-x gdb should Do the Right Thing, whether gdb is run with --annotate=2, --annotate=3, or -i=mi. I.e. it should wait to see GDB's output and then decide based on that output whether to use gdb-mi.el or gdb-ui.el or just gud.el. > Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released? I don't understand this question. Stefan From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:05:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125253335720528 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:05:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 21:55:57 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89LttgM020525 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:55:56 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:34408 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlV8s-0001eC-UU for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:55:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlV8q-0007tH-5n for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:55:54 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:60436) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlV8p-0007t7-NK for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:55:52 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FB63DA9B1; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:48 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9195C164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:47 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:47 +1200 To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, "Jan D." , "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall In-Reply-To: References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 > > If the release of 23.2 is imminent then I could temporarily move > > gdb-ui.el back from EMACS_23_1_RC for the release. It also has some > > new features, e.g. reverse debugging. > > Even if it's not imminent, it's likely that when it will happen many > people will still be using older GDB releases. So it'd be good to keep > the gdb-ui.el code for Emacs-23.2 (and include the new gdb-mi.el as > well). Emacs 23.1 is always an option for those using older GDB releases. Migrating properly to GDB/MI is not an easy thing to do and I want to focus on that rather than on compatibility with old versions of GDB. Others can work on maintaining compatibility if they wish but it will make the code a lot more complicated. > BTW, as you probably already know, I really think that M-x gdb should Do > the Right Thing, whether gdb is run with --annotate=2, --annotate=3, > or -i=mi. I.e. it should wait to see GDB's output and then decide based > on that output whether to use gdb-mi.el or gdb-ui.el or just gud.el. We used to do that with "--fullname" and "--annotate=3" but that caused problems when execution was started in the users .gdbinit file. The two options are now invoked with separate functions (M-x gud-gdb and M-x gdb). > > Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released? > > I don't understand this question. I wondered what was preventing Jan from using GDB 7.0. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:15:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 4375-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4375.12525521677754 (code B ref 4375); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:15:04 +0000 Received: (at 4375) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 03:09:27 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.25]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A39Phc007751 for <4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:09:27 -0700 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182E03DADC7; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:09:20 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91821C164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:09:18 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.28126.571639.841361@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:09:18 +1200 To: Robert Marshall Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) > Also if I try turning on tooltips when I hold the mouse over a > variable I get the message > > error in process filter: Args out of range: "", 0, -1 This bit should now work with GDB 7.0. I've no managed to get this error with earlier GDB but then I've not managed to get the tooltip to appear in this case either. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:35:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 4375-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4375.125255336410397 (code B ref 4375); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:35:04 +0000 Received: (at 4375) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 03:29:24 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.pppoe.ca [206.248.154.181] (may be forged)) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A3TM1o010394 for <4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:29:24 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8EAB4PqEpFpZBe/2dsb2JhbACBU9xmhBgFh20 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,361,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="45492367" Received: from 69-165-144-94.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.144.94]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2009 23:27:47 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E41CD941B; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:29:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, "Jan D." , "emacs-pretest-bug\@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall Message-ID: References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:29:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:47 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Emacs 23.1 is always an option for those using older GDB releases. Rather you mean "using gud-gdb is always an option for those using older GDB releases" (we're talking about what to do for Emacs-23.2, so we take for granted that the user will be using Emacs-23.2). That might be good enough (I personally always end up using gud-gdb since I've always found M-x gdb to be somewhat unreliable). > properly to GDB/MI is not an easy thing to do and I want to focus on that > rather than on compatibility with old versions of GDB. Preserving the gdb-ui.el code should be doable without any interference with gdb-mi.el. The code they share via gud.el is pretty small. >> BTW, as you probably already know, I really think that M-x gdb should Do >> the Right Thing, whether gdb is run with --annotate=2, --annotate=3, >> or -i=mi. I.e. it should wait to see GDB's output and then decide based >> on that output whether to use gdb-mi.el or gdb-ui.el or just gud.el. > We used to do that with "--fullname" and "--annotate=3" but that caused > problems when execution was started in the users .gdbinit file. The two > options are now invoked with separate functions (M-x gud-gdb and M-x gdb). I know, but I still think this is a temporary workaround. We should document it well in some comments to make sure someone who wants to attack the problem doesn't waste time going through the same problems agains. Stefan From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:55:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125255455513085 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:55:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 03:49:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A3nDvi013082 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:49:14 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:38893 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlaen-00012X-0i for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:49:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlael-00086T-0U for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:49:12 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:35460) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlaek-000865-FS for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:49:10 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9673DAE99; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:49:07 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2798C164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:49:05 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:49:03 +1200 To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 > ... and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* > buffer I get the message > > gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process > > and the buffer is not killed :-( I think I've fixed this now. If it works for you can you please close the bug report by replying to 4375-done@debbugs.gnu.org. If there are other outstanding problems please open a new bug report. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:20:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125255601017138 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:20:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 04:13:30 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A4DTHL017135 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:13:30 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:39690) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlb2G-0004nH-OQ for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlb2F-00031X-2K for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:28 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:60517) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlb2E-00031J-Bg for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:26 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392933DACC7; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:13:25 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97454C164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:13:23 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.31971.580210.13808@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:13:23 +1200 To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, "Jan D." , "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall In-Reply-To: References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 > > Emacs 23.1 is always an option for those using older GDB releases. > > Rather you mean "using gud-gdb is always an option for those using older > GDB releases" (we're talking about what to do for Emacs-23.2, so we > take for granted that the user will be using Emacs-23.2). > That might be good enough (I personally always end up using gud-gdb > since I've always found M-x gdb to be somewhat unreliable). No I don't, I mean M-x gdb in Emacs 23.1 is always an option for those using older GDB releases (although it may depend how old, gdb-ui.el is better with 6.4 and later but should work back to 5.0 from 2000). M-x gud-gdb should work in Emacs 23.1.50 as it does in Emacs 23.1. I don't know what you mean by unreliable, but over the years, in my experience, M-x gdb has become more reliable. Of course if you have a highly customized environment, the results might be different and buffers might appear in strange places. If you are having problems, I would recommend starting with gdb-many-windows nil and then the startup should be similar gud-gdb except that you can set breakpoints/control execution in the margin and see the breakpoint locations there. Then you could display new buffers in new frames, as and when needed, by using the pull down menu: GUD > GDB-Frames-> . > > We used to do that with "--fullname" and "--annotate=3" but that caused > > problems when execution was started in the users .gdbinit file. The two > > options are now invoked with separate functions (M-x gud-gdb and M-x gdb). > > I know, but I still think this is a temporary workaround. We should > document it well in some comments to make sure someone who wants to > attack the problem doesn't waste time going through the same problems > agains. On the contrary, I would like to remove gud-gdb at some point in the future. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:45:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125257182422249 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:45:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 08:37:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A8b2dJ022246 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:37:03 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:54252) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlf9J-0005jv-C3 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:37:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlf9G-0004C7-Tc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:37:00 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:60192 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlf9G-0004Bp-Jd for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:36:58 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (SSL 3.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlf4I-0002MV-D2; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:31:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4AA8BA98.7090903@tnei.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:36:40 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19112.28126.571639.841361@totara.tehura.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <19112.28126.571639.841361@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Nick Roberts wrote: > > Also if I try turning on tooltips when I hold the mouse over a > > variable I get the message > > > > error in process filter: Args out of range: "", 0, -1 > > This bit should now work with GDB 7.0. I've no managed to get this > error with earlier GDB but then I've not managed to get the tooltip > to appear in this case either. > > I see the same things - no error and no tooltip. Robert -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE web: http://IPSA-Power.com From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Robert Marshall Subject: bug#4375 closed by Robert Marshall (Re: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer) Message-ID: References: <4AA8BA2E.3020005@tnei.co.uk> <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> X-Emacs-PR-Message: they-closed 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:45:08 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1252572308-23284-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1252572308-23284-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report which was filed against the emacs package: #4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer It has been closed by Robert Marshall . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Robert Marshall by replying to this email. --=20 4375: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D4375 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1252572308-23284-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 4375-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 08:35:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.tnei-mail.com (Debian-exim@tnei.co.uk [83.170.102.119]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A8Z3Zw021938 for <4375-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:35:04 -0700 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (SSL 3.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlf2U-0002LW-2y for 4375-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:29:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4AA8BA2E.3020005@tnei.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:34:54 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 4375-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk Subject: Re: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) works for me! (thanks) Robert -- Robert A J Marshall, web: http://IPSA-Power.com ------------=_1252572308-23284-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2009 15:08:51 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n88F8nN7004891 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:08:51 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:45085 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JN-0000ol-8l for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JL-0003xO-3P for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:48 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:58004 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2JK-0003wu-NH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:08:46 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=robert-laptop.tnei.co.uk) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml2ER-0003ar-FC for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:03:44 +0100 From: Robert Marshall To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:08:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk Subject: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators to read other languages for them. Your bug report will be posted to the emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org mailing list. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug: Maybe associated with the other gdb error I have just reported. If I run gud with --annotate=3 I get lots of pre-prompt and post-prompt output (perhaps this is to be expected), I kill the process with a signals KILL - off the pulldown menu) and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* buffer I get the message gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process and the buffer is not killed :-( Robert If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. If you would like to further debug the crash, please read the file /home/robert/emacs/etc/DEBUG for instructions. In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.16.1) of 2009-09-08 on robert-laptop Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10600000 Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Debugger Minor modes in effect: desktop-save-mode: t recentf-mode: t show-paren-mode: t tooltip-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE tel: +44 161 615 6017; fax: +44 161 615 6001; mobile: +44 7759 688384 web: http://IPSA-Power.com ------------=_1252572308-23284-1-- From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: "Jan D." , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:05:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125257307425194 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:05:05 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 08:57:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A8vrj9025186 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:57:54 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55120 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfTU-0007QG-9s for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:57:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfTR-0007LP-Cc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:57:51 -0400 Received: from proxy3.bredband.net ([195.54.101.73]:65224) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfTQ-0007Kx-Ui for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:57:49 -0400 Received: from iph1.telenor.se (195.54.127.132) by proxy3.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 49F597CD03640730 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:57:45 +0200 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al9SALNcqEpV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBU4g+kSQBAQEBN8E2hBgF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,363,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="43005688" Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by iph1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2009 10:57:45 +0200 Received: from [90.236.249.236] (host-90-236-249-236.mobileonline.telia.com [90.236.249.236]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 086C17FA07B; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:57:44 +0200 (CEST) References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> Message-Id: <34B7CAAB-80E6-4106-B896-96A82F028AE5@swipnet.se> From: "Jan D." To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:57:38 +0200 Cc: Stefan Monnier , "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org>, "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 9 sep 2009 kl. 23.55 skrev nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts): >>> Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released? >> >> I don't understand this question. > > I wondered what was preventing Jan from using GDB 7.0. > Different things. Policy for one, i.e. the tools to use are version controlled locally. Much work for another. Many older distros will never upgrade Gdb. To compile it on many machines is a big job (I don't mind doing it for Emacs since I test and develop Emacs). IMHO this 7.0 requirement will make gdb-mode useless for the majority of users. Do we even know if 7.0 is released before 23.2 is? The strength of gdb-mode in the past is that you just did M-x gdb and it worked with whatever Gdb version you had. Jan D. From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: "Jan D." , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125257350125869 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 09:05:01 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A94x8F025866 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:05:01 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55376 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfaN-0008DO-9m for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:04:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfaK-0008Gu-5D for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:04:58 -0400 Received: from proxy2.bredband.net ([195.54.101.72]:59927) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfaJ-0008Gg-QE for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:04:56 -0400 Received: from iph2.telenor.se (195.54.127.133) by proxy2.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 4A8FF714006F51EF for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:04:54 +0200 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At1SAFdeqEpV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBU4g+N5BtAQEBATfBQoQYBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,363,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="41926194" Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by iph2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2009 11:04:54 +0200 Received: from [90.236.249.236] (host-90-236-249-236.mobileonline.telia.com [90.236.249.236]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 285A27FA07B; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:04:53 +0200 (CEST) References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.31971.580210.13808@totara.tehura.co.nz> Message-Id: From: "Jan D." To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <19112.31971.580210.13808@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:04:48 +0200 Cc: Stefan Monnier , "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org>, "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. 10 sep 2009 kl. 06.13 skrev nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts): > M-x gud-gdb should work in Emacs 23.1.50 as it does in Emacs 23.1. > That is good! But I think 5 From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:15:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125257375927306 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:15:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A99Iht027302 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:09:19 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55546 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfeX-0005Jz-Rk for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfeW-0000Q3-Dw for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:17 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:34827 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfeV-0000Pn-V4 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:16 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlfZb-0002Z0-4Q; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:04:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:09:06 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Nick Roberts wrote: > > ... and if I then attempt to kill the *gud ...* > > buffer I get the message > > > > gdb-input: Buffer *gud-ipsa-scripted* has no process > > > > and the buffer is not killed :-( > > I think I've fixed this now. If it works for you can you please close the bug > report by replying to 4375-done@debbugs.gnu.org. > > If there are other outstanding problems please open a new bug report. > > Though with these changes after I've quit the debugger and attempt to close emacs, I get the following message Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway... Proc Status Buffer Tty Command ---- ------ ------ --- ------- gdb-inferior run (Killed) /dev/pts/3 Do you want a new bug for this? Robert -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE web: http://IPSA-Power.com From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: "Jan D." , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:15:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125257379827315 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:15:06 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 09:09:58 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8A99uHO027312 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:09:57 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55574) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlff9-00068r-TM for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlff9-0000V3-4B for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:55 -0400 Received: from proxy3.bredband.net ([195.54.101.73]:63826) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlff8-0000Uj-81 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:09:55 -0400 Received: from iph1.telenor.se (195.54.127.132) by proxy3.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 49F597CD03642168 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:09:53 +0200 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al9SAAxfqEpV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBU4g+kSQBAQEBN8FAhBgF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,363,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="43008957" Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by iph1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2009 11:09:53 +0200 Received: from [90.236.249.236] (host-90-236-249-236.mobileonline.telia.com [90.236.249.236]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96A257FA07B; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:09:52 +0200 (CEST) References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.31971.580210.13808@totara.tehura.co.nz> Message-Id: From: "Jan D." To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:09:47 +0200 Cc: Nick Roberts , Stefan Monnier , "4375@debbugs.gnu.org" <4375@debbugs.gnu.org>, "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. 10 sep 2009 kl. 11.04 skrev "Jan D." : > > > 10 sep 2009 kl. 06.13 skrev nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts): > >> M-x gud-gdb should work in Emacs 23.1.50 as it does in Emacs 23.1. >> > > That is good! But I think ... that M-x gdb should be gud-gdb and the new mode should have another name. At least until Gdb 7.0 isn't so new and uncommon. Most people don't read NEWS. Jan D. From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12525773123467 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:15:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 10:08:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8AA8VPw003464 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:08:32 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:60216) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MlgZq-0005qR-Gh for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:08:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlgZo-0001sX-IR for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:08:30 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:36832) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlgZo-0001s5-2u for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:08:28 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECEE3DAF4C; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:08:25 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAA2EC164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:08:23 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.53269.454776.781524@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:08:21 +1200 To: Robert Marshall Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 > Though with these changes after I've quit the debugger and attempt to close > emacs, I get the following message > > Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway... > > Proc Status Buffer Tty Command > ---- ------ ------ --- ------- > gdb-inferior run (Killed) /dev/pts/3 > > Do you want a new bug for this? I only see this now if I kill the I/O buffer directly. Do you still see it if you kill the GUD buffer (as recommended in the manual to kill all the buffers associated with the session)? If so, did you recompile both gdb-mi.el and gud.el before you loaded them? I need to handle killing the I/O buffer directly and I'll look into it when I have time. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:45:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12525897523221 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:45:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 13:35:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8ADZpEQ003218 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:35:52 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:34380 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MljoU-0004Vu-C7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:35:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MljoS-0002Gf-33 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:35:49 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:51042) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MljoR-0002GT-Ay for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:35:47 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AD73DAEB9; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:03:56 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D75AC164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:03:54 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19112.53002.590726.359903@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:03:54 +1200 To: "Jan D." Cc: Stefan Monnier , "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall In-Reply-To: <34B7CAAB-80E6-4106-B896-96A82F028AE5@swipnet.se> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> <34B7CAAB-80E6-4106-B896-96A82F028AE5@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 > > I wondered what was preventing Jan from using GDB 7.0. > > > > Different things. Policy for one, i.e. the tools to use are version > controlled locally. Much work for another. Many older distros will > never upgrade Gdb. To compile it on many machines is a big job (I > don't mind doing it for Emacs since I test and develop Emacs). Maybe your use pattern, i.e. Emacs in CVS and old GDB, is somewhat unusual. I would expect most users to have released versions of both programs, probably those which are included in their distribution. > IMHO this 7.0 requirement will make gdb-mode useless for the majority > of users. Do we even know if 7.0 is released before 23.2 is? The > strength of gdb-mode in the past is that you just did M-x gdb and it > worked with whatever Gdb version you had. I expect GDB 7.0 to be released before Emacs 23.2 in which case it's likely that when 23.2 is bundled with a distribution that will include 7.0 too. I'm more concerned about the quality of the mode being worthy for inclusion in the release. In any case, at the moment we're talking about bleeding edge Emacs in CVS. I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect such a version to be stable enough to debug itself and it would seem more natural to use a release version for such a purpose. I don't think that requiring 7.0 will make gdb-mode useless but, in truth, I don't know who uses it, or how they use it. I guess that would need a poll and even then those that repond are likely to be unrepresentative. and: > ... that M-x gdb should be gud-gdb and the new mode should have > another name. At least until Gdb 7.0 isn't so new and uncommon. I think that to swap back now that Emacs 23.1 has been released will only cause confusion. > Most people don't read NEWS. No, but hopefully they will read the documentation. If not, then all is pretty much lost anyway. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125259294012131 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:35:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2009 14:29:00 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8AESwPD012128 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:28:59 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:39188) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlkdt-0001Wp-Pb for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:28:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlkdr-0004BZ-Vf for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:28:57 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:34774 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlkdr-0004BH-Kl for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:28:55 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlkYu-0004s5-Pt; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4AA90D13.80403@tnei.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:28:35 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> <19112.53269.454776.781524@totara.tehura.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <19112.53269.454776.781524@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Nick Roberts wrote: > > Though with these changes after I've quit the debugger and attempt to close > > emacs, I get the following message > > > > Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway... > > > > Proc Status Buffer Tty Command > > ---- ------ ------ --- ------- > > gdb-inferior run (Killed) /dev/pts/3 > > > > Do you want a new bug for this? > > I only see this now if I kill the I/O buffer directly. Do you still see it if > you kill the GUD buffer (as recommended in the manual to kill all the buffers > associated with the session)? > > No I don't see it in this case - previously I'd left the *gud... buffer still open > If so, did you recompile both gdb-mi.el and gud.el before you loaded them? > > I need to handle killing the I/O buffer directly and I'll look into it when I > have time. > > OK. What I'm also seeing is is an error when I've placed a break point Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) propertize(nil font-lock-face font-lock-function-name-face) gdb-breakpoints-list-handler-custom() gdb-breakpoints-list-handler() apply(gdb-breakpoints-list-handler nil) ... if you don't easily see this I will open another bug. Robert -- Robert A J Marshall, TNEI Services Ltd, 86-90 London Road, Manchester, M1 2PW Registered in England & Wales No. 03891836, Registered office: Milburn House, Dean Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1LE web: http://IPSA-Power.com From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts), 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125266573121010 (code B ref -1); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:50:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Sep 2009 10:42:11 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8BAg9vY021005 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:42:10 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:56487) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm3Zw-0001xG-7D for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:42:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm3Zu-0007ti-Cs for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:42:07 -0400 Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:37826) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm3Zt-0007s5-Um for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:42:06 -0400 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.34]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04BD3DAD58; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:37:50 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF76EC164; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:37:49 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19113.29101.770073.727374@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:37:49 +1200 To: Robert Marshall Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4AA90D13.80403@tnei.co.uk> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> <19112.53269.454776.781524@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA90D13.80403@tnei.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 > What I'm also seeing is is an error when I've placed a break point > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) > propertize(nil font-lock-face font-lock-function-name-face) > gdb-breakpoints-list-handler-custom() > gdb-breakpoints-list-handler() > apply(gdb-breakpoints-list-handler nil) > ... > if you don't easily see this I will open another bug. I don't see this. Please do open a new bug report with precise steps to reproduce it. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:23 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Reply-To: Robert Marshall , 4375@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:35:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125267551518207 (code B ref -1); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:35:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Sep 2009 13:25:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8BDPDAx018200 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:25:14 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:49628 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm67k-0006iw-Nr for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm67i-0007AW-HK for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:12 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119]:43074 helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm67h-00079G-NH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:10 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=[130.88.108.50]) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm62i-0003oD-FN; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4AAA4FA8.70608@tnei.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:24:56 +0100 From: Robert Marshall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19112.30511.3918.782044@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA8C232.9030505@tnei.co.uk> <19112.53269.454776.781524@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA90D13.80403@tnei.co.uk> <19113.29101.770073.727374@totara.tehura.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <19113.29101.770073.727374@totara.tehura.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Nick Roberts wrote: > > What I'm also seeing is is an error when I've placed a break point > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) > > propertize(nil font-lock-face font-lock-function-name-face) > > gdb-breakpoints-list-handler-custom() > > gdb-breakpoints-list-handler() > > apply(gdb-breakpoints-list-handler nil) > > ... > > if you don't easily see this I will open another bug. > > I don't see this. Please do open a new bug report with precise steps to > reproduce it. > > Will do, at the moment I can replicate it very easily with the (c++) program (and emacs -Q) I'm developing but not with a small test program or with running emacs under gdb. I may be a little time...! Robert -- Robert A J Marshall,