Package: guix;
Reported by: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:32:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
View this message in rfc822 format
From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#43746: closed (What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:05:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org Subject: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:31:36 +0200[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)][0001-doc-Explain-why-without-tests-may-fail-with-modified.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> Cc: 43746-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 13:03:47 +0200
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.