GNU bug report logs - #43699
[PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars-Dominik Braun <ldb <at> leibniz-psychology.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43699-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#43699] [PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set?
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:30:51 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Ludo,

> The root problem is that the ‘fxbit-set?’ alias defined at the top of
> openpgp.scm had the arguments swapped compared to ‘bit-set?’.  So I
> changed that alias instead of changing its users (‘fxbit-set?’ is
> defined in R6RS).
oh, okay. I looked at SRFI 143 which also has a fxbit-set? with the same
argument order as bit-set?, so I thought the alias was mimicking that API. But
this works too I guess.

Thanks,
Lars

[1] https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-143/srfi-143.html

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.