From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:48:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43661: [mumi] Patch series appear incomplete when viewed with MUMI Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 02:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 43661 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43661@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: rekado@elephly.net X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160125912428159 (code B ref -1); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 02:13:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2020 02:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie4-0007K7-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:04 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie2-0007Jy-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie2-0001Za-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]:46319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie0-0000mS-Ga for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id r8so7019711qtp.13 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=m7bcSs6rB+Azx/eaeL18fSR6eDjuv07wDUzKhpp6gN4=; b=a/B9CV7mluCCK3VIjGwzp3d91YE7A3o4INxGIrXGSrdL6ElOLLh4OLsUqIjBc4bULb L0Qx7G4wCcu/ImhARCmIIqz1JJS/xEMcKbW/iAa8N7kHPzlkTedoWv1p0CpA/vbxEAJt Zy+dTm+aVTE8ww6dnQKKMQQramnqLqyg6mCaGIPa8RNfOhqAicDhPkGiUjPgo/bViGSY p5RLnrfoVVcxZTz+ohFHvgVvUiHYaFng1xGPgVQV/obUCS0KmZxotNreB9S0NCToxjuY SHvuqx/5YQTOruKjczGQjmh6bwFG8k3tSU4gCSg+jiNaM4WHisM/E/ZojlJefLdkQa6m 2c2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=m7bcSs6rB+Azx/eaeL18fSR6eDjuv07wDUzKhpp6gN4=; b=R4ofY2T4t0MlQQG8BZ808tNVUgV8JB5zPEy5HcjLm/G9mDfnXSG73Qy5RPq70/nzOK CEjoDFh7i+rCrQ6q6ieNJ6spYsSLhSTcaHOERG/e/l2bT0RR595VfOIVXWTn+GGku8xM zWAkHEFLVmJN2l2I1yIs/l+kYhmJmQEjlNd9eKYrF8dODl2iXtmkAxuwJaX7Fkvi4NAO UgttlCksT2SLwsVbWjMq+ELhfa9rX4O0ODmasYhBX7f7zd3X3GCNE8cQJzJQHP4TYDtz S31AFPzdEq1IMyVlm3hx4Ii07WITCiq+UDNonXfaJS8ziV2jeeQf+r2A/jwfdgQZqLMM 0aQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VW7dTmy4VIcPOieRlpa2Sih5T3FE+k6WXrP6rfoQUaurn30Te Djoo75k+yuXJ90NOQopZCg3MiRcOuE4bmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnIID6e0bZbUPOc4r3R8eQrnxXlymwFqpFSjvTLQ10uUJo6p3WGwEIQcOaJL1B7Tsm+TQDTw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7147:: with SMTP id h7mr10660389qtp.131.1601259118615; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-149-200.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.149.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j197sm7549492qke.131.2020.09.27.19.11.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:13:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87imbyr6m2.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::832; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x832.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I noticed this problem with the issue #43627, a 3 items patch series sent recently: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43627. The patch 1/3 appears to be missing when viewed at the MUMI-powered link above. Debbugs doesn't have this issue: https://bugs.gnu.org/43627. Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.7 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Hello, I noticed this problem with the issue #43627, a 3 items patch series sent recently: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43627. The patch 1/3 appears to be missing when viewed at the MUMI-powered link above. Debbugs doesn't have this issue: https://bugs.gnu.org/43627. Thanks, Maxim From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:48:23 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#43661: closed (Re: bug#43661: [mumi] Patch series appear incomplete when viewed with MUMI) Message-ID: References: <87mtajqc3a.fsf@gmail.com> <87imbyr6m2.fsf@gmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 43661 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 43661@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:06:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1664409962-3630-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1664409962-3630-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #43661: [mumi] Patch series appear incomplete when viewed with MUMI which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 43661@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 43661: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D43661 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1664409962-3630-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 43661-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2022 00:05:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odh3a-0000vv-4O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:05:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:44982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odh3Y-0000vi-C9 for 43661-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:05:37 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id w9so3305162qvn.11 for <43661-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:05:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=NxJ/zN3YkxgFR4aefbJQAtAvCsh5l4BmSYXfgSdPQyo=; b=OWcvI8P/jonLvjgy/2nHH02JEdEoVsmRvZi4KFf6rg+ELjXn9I5poaEUhFOCC+Qp6i Dpnn7ctGIqjjvCvqsb7MVNz6TIKJS5dmmt5h103BfIVrlzvbGdJAbLBDefX26e50N82Q A65tZMffNUqwsjyZfsOFyJqdUt8E3wjdUfvsQrXAGB1xzlEucH4nx2R+rG4Ktgyl9TwZ zI5WrljaJ2B7kFqYoKWsTZpMQDZbFiwRQTYxU1Dvv2pChYvpTsSi5ND+sD/BqECsQURC CiOqiumBQhzZq+W+Nrkw5J80GobahQFXhkNvDgaXFleioPy/4wCzUfzTbm6cDB/QYRzi uCaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=NxJ/zN3YkxgFR4aefbJQAtAvCsh5l4BmSYXfgSdPQyo=; b=BF0/jnsQ+k/JT1hE0LVGADtkDm6rviAFpHhlP3MMVX0PCJFT/ZIxSjIjumBD+XhuyU 8TDpQzES2BtwpyJ6SRIewTIZIJBnDf0rgd/S2PzwwJ84UCQ8p+1o+4T8Jd2Uu/uczFif RFWQ0eaIdOjlNt4OkB+myHWhHb0clIRhjzd1EKGmSfdit1GiM9s7uJJnziP0VPuDIpO2 V8YCmPlSCIn70xhBAE1dS90+lPm31qP4EJM/PXAvRf/5SK+2lgNKQJeHfvHoMCe6/7Y4 K/230bY8TpwFap15h2smrbHhRMcNl4PNCNO0ulUgRgKqolewCjQVUfJiZ+oYNUh7zG48 mhJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1gtD+9B+P6zcuMSWoRGy+uASPFReUbqDSONyF4Bw4dpm3ihtl5 2/iQphjq+v/Y21cuIQKjkc6B32L7n1yiGw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4vmaZjd4TEhsUKP9QmH7rxxXfe1/h5/zb37uDj6qw7KOXzA+d/yW+KftH9Kpvwg0ykB5Jj+w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:27e4:b0:4ac:a631:f551 with SMTP id jt4-20020a05621427e400b004aca631f551mr575268qvb.12.1664409930936; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-148-95.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.148.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q30-20020a05620a2a5e00b006bbe6e89bdcsm4739168qkp.31.2022.09.28.17.05.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: 43661-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#43661: [mumi] Patch series appear incomplete when viewed with MUMI References: <87imbyr6m2.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:05:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87imbyr6m2.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:13:25 -0400") Message-ID: <87mtajqc3a.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43661-done Cc: rekado@elephly.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello, > > I noticed this problem with the issue #43627, a 3 items patch series > sent recently: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43627. > > The patch 1/3 appears to be missing when viewed at the MUMI-powered link > above. Debbugs doesn't have this issue: https://bugs.gnu.org/43627. I think this was the result of a misconfiguration of git on my part (the encoding was bogus). Happy to close! Maxim ------------=_1664409962-3630-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2020 02:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie4-0007K7-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:04 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie2-0007Jy-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie2-0001Za-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]:46319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMie0-0000mS-Ga for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:12:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id r8so7019711qtp.13 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=m7bcSs6rB+Azx/eaeL18fSR6eDjuv07wDUzKhpp6gN4=; b=a/B9CV7mluCCK3VIjGwzp3d91YE7A3o4INxGIrXGSrdL6ElOLLh4OLsUqIjBc4bULb L0Qx7G4wCcu/ImhARCmIIqz1JJS/xEMcKbW/iAa8N7kHPzlkTedoWv1p0CpA/vbxEAJt Zy+dTm+aVTE8ww6dnQKKMQQramnqLqyg6mCaGIPa8RNfOhqAicDhPkGiUjPgo/bViGSY p5RLnrfoVVcxZTz+ohFHvgVvUiHYaFng1xGPgVQV/obUCS0KmZxotNreB9S0NCToxjuY SHvuqx/5YQTOruKjczGQjmh6bwFG8k3tSU4gCSg+jiNaM4WHisM/E/ZojlJefLdkQa6m 2c2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=m7bcSs6rB+Azx/eaeL18fSR6eDjuv07wDUzKhpp6gN4=; b=R4ofY2T4t0MlQQG8BZ808tNVUgV8JB5zPEy5HcjLm/G9mDfnXSG73Qy5RPq70/nzOK CEjoDFh7i+rCrQ6q6ieNJ6spYsSLhSTcaHOERG/e/l2bT0RR595VfOIVXWTn+GGku8xM zWAkHEFLVmJN2l2I1yIs/l+kYhmJmQEjlNd9eKYrF8dODl2iXtmkAxuwJaX7Fkvi4NAO UgttlCksT2SLwsVbWjMq+ELhfa9rX4O0ODmasYhBX7f7zd3X3GCNE8cQJzJQHP4TYDtz S31AFPzdEq1IMyVlm3hx4Ii07WITCiq+UDNonXfaJS8ziV2jeeQf+r2A/jwfdgQZqLMM 0aQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VW7dTmy4VIcPOieRlpa2Sih5T3FE+k6WXrP6rfoQUaurn30Te Djoo75k+yuXJ90NOQopZCg3MiRcOuE4bmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnIID6e0bZbUPOc4r3R8eQrnxXlymwFqpFSjvTLQ10uUJo6p3WGwEIQcOaJL1B7Tsm+TQDTw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7147:: with SMTP id h7mr10660389qtp.131.1601259118615; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-149-200.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.149.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j197sm7549492qke.131.2020.09.27.19.11.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: [mumi] Patch series appear incomplete when viewed with MUMI Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 22:13:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87imbyr6m2.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::832; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x832.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I noticed this problem with the issue #43627, a 3 items patch series sent recently: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43627. The patch 1/3 appears to be missing when viewed at the MUMI-powered link above. Debbugs doesn't have this issue: https://bugs.gnu.org/43627. Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.7 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: rekado@elephly.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Hello, I noticed this problem with the issue #43627, a 3 items patch series sent recently: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43627. The patch 1/3 appears to be missing when viewed at the MUMI-powered link above. Debbugs doesn't have this issue: https://bugs.gnu.org/43627. Thanks, Maxim ------------=_1664409962-3630-1-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 23 08:24:11 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2024 13:24:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdVX9-0000M9-9g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:24:11 -0500 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:52832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rdVX7-0000Lx-DD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:24:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=0PeEJYVffjYOBZE HGZWFMzZuqMQDkikIxyohJDTEc0c=; h=date:cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=hd uWOtzruwXENaYv9M3KDGM1xgXMQYebOROpyi0dQOtUdq2T6NJqybegl/3CYFadl66+XGCW UBykA+2Hr1VxczMBuTammIk7z3rZCtX5l1M2wILplj4MsIJKCrQt59gJs9+QO10yOuBB1/ DQRuB/cf0/1x1pROxNrsDEG9pWvE4= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ed37bc2b (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:23:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Felix Lechner To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:23:44 -0800 Message-ID: <875xyf1fhb.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: unarchive 68680 reassign 68680 mumi archive 68680 unarchive 63802 reassign 63802 mumi archive 63802 unarchive 63215 reassign 63215 mumi archive 63215 Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) unarchive 68680 reassign 68680 mumi archive 68680 unarchive 63802 reassign 63802 mumi archive 63802 unarchive 63215 reassign 63215 mumi archive 63215 unarchive 61645 reassign 61645 mumi archive 61645 unarchive 60410 reassign 60410 mumi archive 60410 unarchive 60292 reassign 60292 mumi archive 60292 unarchive 60292 reassign 60292 mumi archive 60292 unarchive 58573 reassign 58573 mumi archive 58573 unarchive 54024 reassign 54024 mumi archive 54024 unarchive 49115 reassign 49115 mumi archive 49115 unarchive 48160 reassign 48160 mumi archive 48160 unarchive 47739 reassign 47739 mumi archive 47739 unarchive 47520 reassign 47520 mumi archive 47520 unarchive 47121 reassign 47121 mumi archive 47121 unarchive 45015 reassign 45015 mumi archive 45015 unarchive 43661 reassign 43661 mumi archive 43661 unarchiv 43166 reassign 43166 mumi archive 43166 unarchive 41906 reassign 41906 mumi archive 41906 unarchive 41098 reassign 41098 mumi archive 41098 unarchive 39924 reassign 39924 mumi archive 39924 unarchive 39924 reassign 39924 mumi archive 39924 unarchive 39924 reassign 39924 mumi archive 39924 thanks