GNU bug report logs - #43578
[PATCH 0/4] Rewriting implicit inputs with 'package-input-rewriting' & co.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:14:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 43578 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#43578] [PATCH 0/4] Rewriting implicit inputs with 'package-input-rewriting' & co.
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:53:51 +0200
Hi zimoun,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> I miss why the hash is the same.  I was expecting a different one, as
> with your ’hello’ example (that I reproduce exactly).  What do I miss?
>
> Note it is the same with:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build emacs-helm --with-input=emacs=emacs-next
> /gnu/store/ka9lph0hpzaky0sa52zf09469apkhb68-emacs-helm-3.6.5

That’s because ‘emacs-helm’ depends on ‘emacs-minimal’, not ‘emacs’:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix graph --path -t bag emacs-helm emacs
guix graph: error: no path from 'emacs-helm <at> 3.6.5' to 'emacs <at> 27.1'
$ guix graph --path -t bag emacs-helm emacs-minimal 
emacs-helm <at> 3.6.5
emacs-minimal <at> 27.1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Does it work for you if you do ‘--with-input=emacs-minimal=emacs-next’?

HTH,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 225 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.