GNU bug report logs -
#43578
[PATCH 0/4] Rewriting implicit inputs with 'package-input-rewriting' & co.
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:14:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed, patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 18:12, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Concretely, the following commands had no effect thus far:
>
> guix build python-itsdangerous --with-input=python=python2
> guix build hello --with-input=gcc=gcc-toolchain <at> 10
>
> In both cases, this is because the input we want to change is
> an implicit input. This patch set fixes that, and it fixes
> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42156> as a side effect.
Maybe I am doing wrong and I miss something.
For example, I want to build the package ’emacs-helm’ –which does not
(directly) depends on the package ’emacs’– using the package
’emacs-next’ (changing the Emacs VM from 27 to 28 in this case).
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build emacs emacs-next
/gnu/store/7kr0pg7gwhc31q4iq5vbnm5n99srhp84-emacs-next-28.0.50.1-0.2ea3466
/gnu/store/q3c6y4ccj3li5gfdcbyz24n466fnipp1-emacs-27.1
$ cat /tmp/manif.scm
(specifications->manifest '("emacs-helm"))
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build -m /tmp/manif.scm
/gnu/store/ka9lph0hpzaky0sa52zf09469apkhb68-emacs-helm-3.6.5
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build -m /tmp/manif.scm --with-input=emacs=emacs-next
/gnu/store/ka9lph0hpzaky0sa52zf09469apkhb68-emacs-helm-3.6.5
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I miss why the hash is the same. I was expecting a different one, as
with your ’hello’ example (that I reproduce exactly). What do I miss?
Note it is the same with:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build emacs-helm --with-input=emacs=emacs-next
/gnu/store/ka9lph0hpzaky0sa52zf09469apkhb68-emacs-helm-3.6.5
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, I am trying to provide an example to [1] because your patch set
supersedes it, somehow.
[1] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/41732#7>
(I have not yet tried the build transformation at the manifest level.)
All the best,
simon
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 227 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.