GNU bug report logs - #43501
gst-plugins-bad fails to build on armhf-linux

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 43501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, 43501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43501: gst-plugins-bad cannot be built on linux-armhf,
 breaking qemu
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 18:00:29 -0400

Earlier, I wrote:
> Ever since 'spice-gtk' was added, it has included *every* gstreamer
> plugin package in its 'propagated-inputs'.

On my private branch, I removed 'gst-libav', 'gst-plugins-bad' and
'gst-plugins-ugly' from the propagated-inputs of 'spice-gtk'.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/gnu/packages/spice.scm b/gnu/packages/spice.scm
index 4aff8dbf56..4b4c673a9d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/spice.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/spice.scm
@@ -144,11 +144,8 @@ which allows users to view a desktop computing environment.")
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (propagated-inputs
       `(("gstreamer" ,gstreamer)
-        ("gst-libav" ,gst-libav)
         ("gst-plugins-base" ,gst-plugins-base)
         ("gst-plugins-good" ,gst-plugins-good)
-        ("gst-plugins-bad" ,gst-plugins-bad)
-        ("gst-plugins-ugly" ,gst-plugins-ugly)
         ("spice-protocol" ,spice-protocol)
 
         ;; These are required by the pkg-config files.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I rebuilt my system and user profiles with this patch applied, and
everything seems to work fine.  Moreover, I'm glad to report that
'gst-plugins-ugly' is no longer in my store.  (Sadly, 'gst-plugins-bad'
still is, because our 'gnome' package depends on 'cheese' which depends
on 'gst-plugins-bad', and last I checked that was unavoidable.)

I haven't tried using the 'spice' functionality specifically, but I
suspect that any reduced "out-of-the-box" functionality could be
regained by users simply installing those plugins as needed, along with
gstreamer for its 'native-search-paths' field.

What do you think?

      Mark

PS: Danny's idea is worth considering in its own right, but I think it's
    orthogonal to this proposed change.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.