GNU bug report logs - #43494
[PATCH 0/4] Add package and services for the Guix Build Coordinator

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:35:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#43494] [PATCH 2/4] services: guix: Add guix-build-coordinator-service-type.
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:43:31 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi!
>
> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> +  (program-file
>>>> +   "start-guix-build-coordinator"
>>>> +   (with-extensions (cons guix-build-coordinator-package
>>>> +                          ;; This is a poorly constructed Guile load path,
>>>> +                          ;; since it contains things that aren't Guile
>>>> +                          ;; libraries, but it means that the Guile libraries
>>>> +                          ;; needed for the Guix Build Coordinator don't need
>>>> +                          ;; to be individually specified here.
>>>> +                          (map second (package-inputs
>>>> +                                       guix-build-coordinator-package)))
>>>
>>> Perhaps there should eventually be a ‘guix-build-coordinator’ command in
>>> the package itself?
>>
>> There actually is, one thing I've had in mind for a while now though is
>> to use a scheme script constructed by the Guix service to run the
>> coordinator.
>>
>> For guix.cbaines.net, I'm using the script, but with the hooks passed in
>> on the command line, the command is rather long, and it means that
>> backtraces don't work well with the hooks.
>
> You mean because the hooks are interpreted, and so all you see in the
> backtrace is a bunch of ‘eval’ calls?

Yeah, I haven't done much testing of this, but that's my assumption.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 307 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.