GNU bug report logs - #43489
[PATCH] Don't signal scan-error when moving by sexp interactively

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 43489 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43489: [PATCH] Don't signal scan-error when moving by sexp interactively
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:25:41 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Mattias,

I haven't looked at your patch, but I hope you are taking care with
the C-M- family of commands.  It is not only mark-sexp that has
that property that it warns about something potentially off screen.
Many other C-M- commands also have that.  Think  M-7 C-M-k for
example.  I hope you understand you are touching a cornerstone
of Lisp-related (actually, not only Lisp) editing here.

So I think I can get used to differently worded messages, but the
errors themselves are pretty useful.

João



On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 6:12 PM Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org> wrote:

> 21 sep. 2020 kl. 10.49 skrev João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>:
>
> > If, however,
> > the message is "Unbalanced parenthesis", I know something's up
> > and have to fix it.
>
> Thanks for mentioning mark-sexp; it was accidentally omitted in my patch.
> I agree that this particular condition in mark-sexp merits special
> treatment; the reason for not being able to extend the mark may be far from
> the cursor and even off-screen.
> It is probably worthwhile to communicate the "unbalanced parenthesis" case
> differently.
>
> For those wondering what this is about: the condition arises when C-M-SPC
> is pressed with point before an unbalanced left bracket.
>
>

-- 
João Távora

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.