Subject: Re: bug#43489: [PATCH] Don't signal scan-error when moving by sexp interactively

From: Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:33:02 +0200

23 sep. 2020 kl. 15.40 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>:

> The parameter is NOERROR, but now it does signal an error.  :-)
> 
> So perhaps the parameter should be USER-ERROR/TERSE-ERROR or something
> and the doc strings adjusted?

Good catch, thank you! The pushed change uses USER-ERROR.