From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 00:22:31 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 04:22:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ7uo-0000op-LY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:22:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ6In-0004WJ-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:39:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ6In-0007jK-Af for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:39:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ6In-0003DY-25 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:39:09 -0400 Received: from [14.20.91.167] (port=31898 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ6Im-0006az-8P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:39:08 -0400 User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 26.1 From: Nala Ginrut To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:39:03 +0800 Message-ID: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:22:28 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi folks! I encountered this error text when I run `guix pull' on Debian. I just report by its suggestion. -------------------------------------------cut--------------------------------------------- Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... |guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/kqfj3rfhfllwjbrbgb32mczpcksmbxbq-compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "679d5e6b3dcac4ee1f419c04b3719fead0bd9ee5"; system: "x86_64-linux"; host version: "1.1.0"; pull-version: 1). Please report it by email to . -------------------------------------------end--------------------------------------------- Best regards. -- GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE9TtMVpW15NVgk0MkhGlncoRqAFgFAl9kHccACgkQhGlncoRq AFhT7g//Xiz4me88HyS3HuWW1OInsf0cuKmHo7zwzokoeJU4JYKWYDyJgqKzfafF nwIDOAavyU9oO74MEvG9lMitpvPU/nsbjV9XkCdDlGRfFdBAui5FEUoBO/hOiGuT jeecxWzeQNBjT3Zsd09leiYG9y7qbGlYbUeDLlJmfr3NdkEqxtQyXr5DeSDe8ErA G+ZiIJXLlfC4vgyjbE101G7bSjjnfG//gjIxiybQapOgBPWNhj6IlPiV0ZriI6Pn WLVGhnmyOi3k6LK3DS1Ex1HGMqB1UY4qoTyPfTBJzUwKEjf92VdotjbsGQHmV+jm jOKG01MJY51YADrLaAOjtJ4T0e5Q51tDzV8gpniGMjkcOZdxy0greND9Le1aLzku Iueu9l8M5SialxjdtFTJz9W/N3ycFtwMfZi7PVPSyNuZCCgPwSi/E/GPT2LPBt5C C7Mk+0hLbibDtjiy+M/oltLyumA8/krLYHzI5RZ0NfA4egggSBvOAPOLs6bJzxz+ O1u6yjG8Li/zGaFBn/xnpCjlL4YpdrkFGvOGDwgu75gOAJiEWvvryXNPMuLveMXT Z9L5dwxm0EixIoRedOvo8hIPTKYZVYJalgjZ/SzYYK3pgM1BeIjsriCtABwSVgTo e1k+fUCnO/su/CaGSfNR89PQCuT4Rhwqk8fWPuG7XVuKUjkpxqo= =UoJZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 08:16:13 2020 Received: (at 43486) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 12:16:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFJE-0007P2-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:16:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFJD-0007On-Ui for 43486@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:16:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFJ8-0001d4-MJ for 43486@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:16:06 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43258 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJFJ6-0002DH-Dl; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:16:05 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Nala Ginrut Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Jour du Travail de =?utf-8?Q?l'Ann=C3=A9e?= 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:16:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> (Nala Ginrut's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:39:03 +0800") Message-ID: <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43486 Cc: 43486@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Nala Ginrut skribis: > I encountered this error text when I run `guix pull' on Debian. > I just report by its suggestion. > > Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... |guix pull: error: You fo= und a bug: the program '/gnu/store/kqfj3rfhfllwjbrbgb32mczpcksmbxbq-compute= -guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "679d5e6b3dcac4ee1f41= 9c04b3719fead0bd9ee5"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "1.1.0"; pull-version: 1). > Please report it by email to . Could you paste the lines that were written just above? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 20 22:50:39 2020 Received: (at 43486) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 02:50:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKBuY-0001YE-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:50:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKBuV-0001Xy-V0 for 43486@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:50:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKBuP-0004FF-Tx; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:50:29 -0400 Received: from [113.89.96.22] (port=51949 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKBuE-0007sJ-UB; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:50:24 -0400 References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 26.1 From: Nala Ginrut To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d In-reply-to: <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:50:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87zh5j7sif.fsf@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43486 Cc: 43486@debbugs.gnu.org, Nala Ginrut X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo! I've tried again, it seems the bug mention has gone, however, the process was always killed: =2D----------------------------------cut-----------------------------------= ------ root@tokyo-nala-prv:~# guix pull -c 1 -M 1 guile: warning: failed to install locale Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.or= g/git/guix.git'... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 0a38519 Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... / substitute: /gnu/store/29jhbbg1hf557x8j53f9sxd9imlmf02a-bash-minimal-5.0.7/= bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.utf8) The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/p663xc05y6pk19nfifjcg06jfx98m9jd-profile.drv building package cache... |Killed =2D---------------------------------------------end------------------------= ------------- What's possibily wrong? Best regards. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello, > > Nala Ginrut skribis: > >> I encountered this error text when I run `guix pull' on Debian. >> I just report by its suggestion. >> >> Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... |guix pull: error: You f= ound a bug: the program '/gnu/store/kqfj3rfhfllwjbrbgb32mczpcksmbxbq-comput= e-guix-derivation' >> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "679d5e6b3dcac4ee1f4= 19c04b3719fead0bd9ee5"; system: "x86_64-linux"; >> host version: "1.1.0"; pull-version: 1). >> Please report it by email to . > > Could you paste the lines that were written just above? > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. =2D- GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE9TtMVpW15NVgk0MkhGlncoRqAFgFAl9oFOgACgkQhGlncoRq AFiM9Q/8DlJ/g6HGX+RMUASPiUXREcjGoY1dwcHgC3U4dvpgb03ptzfNFPdWA8Z4 bLUrG0OF5O13u2gEAlztF7eYZWLnojIushza9Yutp4bculRDwAZ67oxybcQwUnUe rqfbbW8os8ndK1TaImVGYak36eySlH9GQTVOjtDLHBI04chUJbKlPzovCZ6bwtyq VsN7JGN5vdqtOZQ/YF1luMOtKsX7a/VROA6M6JsS1EclkicabHyUXwTniFm4mq8e CWx6+fM8CRkM1TM2sXMlLNgm0GUuTrA3DfJg17Pf52c+XETyHo1gE0yOQNL8eJAI KuTABxpohuRsOY0d4nq+upKWMhgIr1lnLxnzVZD6QFW4Jg+oF3VBSi+A0EiFVTir Dw/s36gqVFaCE9EX+NKziFZWF4kSXIqOWa/cnkGnUPEwiqqXW6XxOlj5is+eSNW2 zpvIjjtcW8rNwGmPco8J3iN610NbM6522MOMPTFO+cLPcDkRRmhlCGuehLgBRLGm 927wtVZKLuSeSta7xPqj8OeJam9vz93B5dlz5JGdYPBqgirmYXyXV/MDUzD32Sxj Ixx1fFVy58mcJDdCPZSM6lnaO5Y0Azgn2IAeC7r7/Wc8aV/IcPRqhUwM+5IEO0zQ p136ad0guE5pkFUHSvq7QozSjfJ8TOKilccYjd0Gmtg4dLfRYtk= =Jjjp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 21 06:33:56 2020 Received: (at 43486) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 10:33:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKJ8u-0004aL-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:33:56 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:48624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKJ8s-0004aC-5a for 43486@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:33:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=QsXaTk5rNZ102XZ8XfJomOnjSh0L0HH5yg4Ehj/+/RE=; h=references: in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; b=Q/xxJOuOyi6MQkbfrVIJ1TXDN1KkU9K cQRPlrj//6NAFtUUJQs5yPppDzLijs49uKp/9NBKbl3gvqcAWGatB7A8jbUUsFfKt4M97H jPOJAe64Yp+ftIT6OsY5Qvyrj1lTQ2SmOjosgn+nGbPbuYbGv8TfemrX1KunuwAVqXUNaY VzEKQh0FrW2muFJAMQl8mXUAbCxClECDyTrDoOMleRVCsYHZstXDNN9s1ENJGWwGPE22V2 S/8o8G6E6AnRHaIJuY9cCePvHISYFZN7F1V+eC36qA9POOmv/o7j6b9NI4XT8/X3YUbZRg jCTjoIXIm/tGx5KNAVjhFdzsnhablqw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f623fd5d; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:33:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:33:56 +0200 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Nala Ginrut Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d In-Reply-To: <87zh5j7sif.fsf@debian> References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5j7sif.fsf@debian> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43486 Cc: 43486@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On 2020-09-21 4:50, Nala Ginrut wrote: > building package cache... > |Killed The most common cause for this helpful error message is running out of memory (OOM). Check your dmesg (-T) around that time, also for other possible errors. Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 21 18:23:54 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 22:23:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKUDy-0002Hy-Ei for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKUDw-0002Hj-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKUDw-00082O-Fb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:52 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:34127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKUDt-0002qY-E1; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:52 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA315C01E8; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=TPsw9deDjfSuaAR+1pgksid8 QFp3rCeO3zE0gdoV608=; b=OdzCkSaddBBp0E3TmN5Z32OYTMVbgHt2BwN77q2F 3owWSV0dYKxHcgUZ5C3/CjXao5+sj6KVbNLyl9l/UsuWAa4oildIYhuT8TrZGT9b DVZY2oF+vhli4g+YhtDbfd4fCJNXkd3puflgLs0AgnHQZhrZvqy0C9M3QKwELJ0Y DvQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=TPsw9d eDjfSuaAR+1pgksid8QFp3rCeO3zE0gdoV608=; b=fWXAYJViazUFKszEN6v/XP 2EbncReKKzHPWxQHVskxyl9D4DbIQrV11L5mj5c1zvZLXqz9fHD5sTAY/4ZRJEf7 +S/xSp+SIFYsIDE6jWT4l/eN5dUf9+8rFYmE+phfhnKkG5+DZONaJ8q1hBvNq87M mhoWbiQthY7tuyM4EGrXR1LbnDgAHiAeE6U/FuwoOaNn7DSzI4l/BCipm6sGe3qG CngAGgaV0Je3RFCvD1pNi3fUfGvOy1MlTRlry5oOtC+DPJ4dU23jVa8dBX7dQIJv V0w5r4Qn3DBWoTVHeyZ4nK0SlFIXbiF0KEbStIqTIQvVL8u7mitQBSon6qpIqhOw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudefgddtlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefg necukfhppedujedvrdehkedrvddtiedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.206.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0153D3064680; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:23:44 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d Message-ID: <20200921222344.GC18499@jasmine.lan> References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5j7sif.fsf@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.27; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/21 18:11:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > On 2020-09-21 4:50, Nala Ginrut wrote: > > building package cache... > > |Killed > > The most comm [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=leo%40famulari.name; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [172.58.206.184 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 43486@debbugs.gnu.org, Nala Ginrut , Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > On 2020-09-21 4:50, Nala Ginrut wrote: > > building package cache... > > |Killed > > The most comm [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [172.58.206.184 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=leo%40famulari.name;ip=209.51.188.17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:33:56PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > On 2020-09-21 4:50, Nala Ginrut wrote: > > building package cache... > > |Killed > > The most common cause for this helpful error message is running out of > memory (OOM). > > Check your dmesg (-T) around that time, also for other possible errors. If that's the case, it would be useful to know how much RAM was available to the system. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 12 13:11:56 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2020 17:11:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kS1Ma-0004Hi-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:11:56 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kS1MY-0004Ha-DS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:11:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS1MW-0005g9-Sy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:11:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS1MV-00033y-Ou; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:11:51 -0400 Received: from [113.89.99.108] (port=48969 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kS1MU-0006Bv-JL; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:11:51 -0400 References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Nala Ginrut To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d In-reply-to: <20200921222344.GC18499@jasmine.lan> <87zh5j7sif.fsf@debian> <20200921222344.GC18499@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: <87wnzvxtbn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:11:40 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 43486@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > If that's the case, it would be useful to know how much RAM was > available to the system. This bug has gone from my system, I've run `guix pull` each day since then, they're all ok. But I'd like to answer your question: 16G RAM + 18G swap. Best regargs. -- GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE9TtMVpW15NVgk0MkhGlncoRqAFgFAl+EjlIACgkQhGlncoRq AFhEBw/+PxJWT84vc34Nq9FnwIV4P4Tm3bghPs+keC3ZFPHFuQn1YC8/9zH8BI/9 4Uk3MP8Usa27tEQWj1KoDg3fioVnzErz6Q/w+OIDxJFMvmBpSvxE916BU6hqTvNf AiC1KpgFm4FDMq4jh/aHz5dyDb71ilFUDI/JtSL1p4BYfg2EF75Ldd5kDk/P9GNZ 1co1ZyTyJu76FWGn17I0NW1x1czW4Em1R8FH2Vqm6hVyVfpKbADmObIXVx2Jck7h DGqHoOfniiZR6lhRu8EWioe8lNAB6mhgviPZAxBVm5jfZY/tr9aBn5njWYlzHWYa Tx579+i/sTpDRszqTsDOW0A6/uNWdyVNXKxnBGmhV6f22CNEGG5i4EuIbsTzi/G4 08XzodH3Vsfg6fh3mifj4zqkN3o/RA4F6QSIoVgvfgr0kXCvFLDurREGgk6iYLJZ +OWvDdEUEaN0XJStif5NQvidBKm4y3p1NrpMboRsIw4Po4PYgaCcL53Bs8aRHd4p BEDgmqdYWqSRQuAm2sK2SJZqXfCgbrSqXO4Oa9NfV690eBSTP7vYWjYTNQPi92ii T3qBNPkU3vDePBFWRgYSp0nSfqtyuHocvNaTNmpuYFPmcfetvKcyxpJIZdNtYoOn NcfxBWm4NNyO40lD6rM2+H2jkeH94tDqui7LzNSGMau4CLjG4x0= =wLSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 14 10:24:21 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2020 14:24:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kShhU-0005Ay-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kShhS-0005Am-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kShhS-0000pA-K3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:18 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kShhP-0004X9-4O; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:18 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6515C027F; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=kG0o5o5t0+BxMcI8lN1DQDtQ cMz54+V7LR/A1AnX9MY=; b=JZf1XtZTrxsN28TK5fKXh/8PxyWZ1El+C90GZ1ZP WIheHXGJ9YR3MmyMU3eWqOeQdR0aUTjdm640yDJuFfFPhLHDpLReiEvpklQ9CUrs P9z+5JVBo/rmW/S+xfb1pRFZViYgUQnQIw8fBADdlcbjrP3Qi1Jqj1MbB3Q5s3Ru 1rE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=kG0o5o 5t0+BxMcI8lN1DQDtQcMz54+V7LR/A1AnX9MY=; b=rWb6tPpd3RMpEVlrmYh4cX rAYPrBF1zKuMuzxUHJVUyUwZNpl5EAwTg0/m3yQI5N3XqVVnWx4/j9wmwLeC5p8U h5Bbr1km6M/K/xlDTHumd3yOhGW7Ix97vwb7Ql+POwF13dr34Kgu1XrHDa/wcrN8 XS2cczOfAv9a/fKK7P8yVaA/tBVHEs3ntnxiC0hM/2G2HzT0NQpPM/Us20adb1dj SsErZaj7Yrv5ruV9ybwWR2GZboH/8wwyMETMJJwkDjdH+o2i0XRvEcXLgLpnVM7l 4OPaRfIJtfChHKbkoEoM3ed+J303/BydajudPLEaiWHmSJs0KqvruOS5I0AFbZpQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedriedugdejhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepudekveegteekleetgfeitdejgfejkeffudethedvhfeukeduleeikeejfeehffet necukfhppeejfedrudeguddruddvjedrudegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DDED3280064; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:24:09 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Nala Ginrut Subject: Re: bug#43486: guix pull raised a bug in 679d5e6b3d Message-ID: <20201014142409.GA17293@jasmine.lan> References: <87lfh77qrc.fsf@debian> <87y2l7xou4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzvxtbn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wnzvxtbn.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/14 10:24:12 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 43486-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:11:40AM +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote: >=20 > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > If that's the case, it would be useful to know how much RAM was > > available to the system. >=20 > This bug has gone from my system, I've run `guix pull` each day since > then, they're all ok. But I'd like to answer your question: 16G RAM + 18G= swap. Okay. I'll close the bug for now. Feel free to re-open it if the problem happens again. --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl+HCfsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiw1RAAw+V9nDoC3k7wZI0eBltCe6jGWxwbJuBzXOqAAizBSmnzoqt85hX85nb5 /23+EN1tpSaOwQHjOytktpPwQsnJd1w0EKltZFIHMNhAlnXSq14FjbrNZeZehRof xuO05n8wChfLYKCjZnBEGyK2c2kXB3o4awrId40+HzPLFMMY1Jq+JFZvBScGSjAp Txtz6QwaDW6sY9sQWt4oZvB20pgIBCFlIoAvZwW01rJc6jNr2oYMyBHLIBtCf1Ue MuGipuXBaW+lm20q9dkWqEbILYLwv9EL8OmPNgQN/i8OZTwbEV8ie5buYSgGEmT/ uRdLW3+GOPE5kRbDSvjNkJW4gZJclxqZCvQPP5p40p2HJuO3uAtC3187EadDJj7A P13+9fEVuIc0P6oFZf93PQ3l5LMXvidlLGoH2WbPAcf0Xu5j5IGgdv3ljrzl6jAk 0tDHc7sFXEUt88Jo6D7+pAFzfG6MaaFCRFrVhATEBH06y/0cjdStmzjMuiNJZvYi grU5CFBl8XX8SCNdFBUTL9cHpJ8ATnqbj5mxYhhpAZJTZe8QuKIfr+qoFASS2twe 19/wQ/QPV5FGtHyI+8WFTB7xQ5iToXdKrH7b9ipsAWRBPinsFKBAE4iAP/7/YrjY Fdm80S0bLlTPsnWQQ5pgNDT4cMzpxo3MpweTG1SitpM69Yvk+Ws= =HDW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:45:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator