From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 17:30:57 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2020 21:30:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHZaL-0006HJ-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHZaJ-0006HB-7V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHZaI-0002p1-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:54 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:49728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHZaE-0004sg-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08DLStJ4165394 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:49 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=Ec4NMWqBfB0z3lh/I0snN8kuDfHigKTv8ISy3wp0gF0=; b=kQPX6hVRS7kzeMBijGC/zho8KwOtxbSBdd0gzcmIqtGkDkucK+ff2hCMOPzR/STbNo6x pwYE0Lxwn8AAdhZ8WzcCpkOGB/LvVoVbf3Awu4L8LbinzU63Ewq1MYsgun6etwPDZdjO VSE66O0mFbUcc5JyTwA1j0v081rOsNvzgy5c1OsUSWF1BkeQkoCfZnn/6CODpNkkN6xk ZpJx9RQEgM/ceCZOtMSWHOIcZhO9gkat+PdZ5gsjXarNlip2agcHo1U8BC6XXWbS+JHR EzjS9VU7tfGibi0FnCRZIBiNt7dLDYiwkGUO/XMG60p74Y93l9g2nnhC+a5x1OM/G+FZ ZQ== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gnrqkfsw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:49 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08DLQBEF001858 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:48 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33h7wk2awc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:48 +0000 Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 08DLUlxn023498 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:47 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5044.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130198 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130198 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/13 17:30:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -60 X-Spam_score: -6.1 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) >From emacs -Q, when I use C-c C-c to send a bug report, it used to just ask me how to send it, with "mail client" being the default. Now it asks me whether .i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me is really my email address. When I say no, it just ends the interaction. This is a regression. What's more, after I edit that default From field to provide my email address, it asks whether I want to save this. I answer yes, but it makes no difference. Another M-x report-emacs-bug, at least in the same session, shows that it still uses that default From text. All of this is a regression, I believe. I can easily use M-x report-emacs-bug from emacs -Q with other releases, and not have to jump through any such hoops. In GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2020-08-12 built on CIRROCUMULUS Repository revision: 86d8d76aa36037184db0b2897c434cdaab1a9ae8 Repository branch: HEAD Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.18362 System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (v10.0.1903.18362.1016) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 19:22:25 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2020 23:22:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52020 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbKD-0002Yx-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:22:25 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbKC-0002Yk-1d for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:22:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gh+F2DYODq4My82RYQqYeYY1YLOmkXrHMNQsnhxL60Q=; b=K3UAckIZfLylv0HkMqMZVEOOCE ikT4J87ydMPKUln8ZeRHWvVjRx87Z3yFlU0p3ihAAiEQoWAMF3Is7ywDbDzHvcnjH79lkWuX+CtBw SHXO6DRcJFfABcYl6qYTfyYqq/ut4BByfyg+euY1ldC4qG7Evu4GT/wRCJf/hQeBYN5M=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbJz-00012B-St; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:22:17 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> X-Now-Playing: Rema Rema's _Fond Reflections (1): Demos and Demolitions_: "Why Ask Why" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:22:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2020 21:30:41 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Drew Adams writes: >>From emacs -Q, when I use C-c C-c to send a bug report, it used to just > ask me how to send it, with "mail client" being the default. > > Now it asks me whether host>.i-did-not-set--mail-host [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: >>>From emacs -Q, when I use C-c C-c to send a bug report, it used to just > ask me how to send it, with "mail client" being the default. > > Now it asks me whether host>.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me is really my email > address. When I say no, it just ends the interaction. It asks you to edit the From address, which you should do. (But it should place point on the From line instead of leaving it at the end of the buffer; I've now fixed this on the trunk.) > This is a regression. Nope. > What's more, after I edit that default From field to provide my email > address, it asks whether I want to save this. I answer yes, but it > makes no difference. Another M-x report-emacs-bug, at least in the > same session, shows that it still uses that default From text. It doesn't ask me that. Perhaps you're thinking of the next question you're getting -- which mail transport to use? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 19:56:21 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2020 23:56:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbr3-0005X6-Gv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:56:21 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:37646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbr1-0005Wo-HH for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:56:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08DNuBgO050068; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=nzLaBx7UK3TmgODLgjgXFWODvMsU2Gc83+Q6BWo/2m8=; b=GQLgQhVZiO2BNu7TMHP1xFy0REFpojljZCKFkFQCOruFIaP6wOeJuGUKJxjUZ40+7QXX aOwNFmVG8zMt5JS7GQutpGOgJ/PtlVomoAWwzep2IkqhhHLXdAmcYmGwNSBDmOX/ldOq 27fKDk6K5b+NKrZypH/R2QHwdSN0WUojPWu3M4o0AYRKv36r5nPRA43gGZ7MykCXe0Sj 6yTXSTBovF8j8uO71DluX1Sx9kzxjUNrvDJ5apME93Uc/qoV5qjMtmbK8Khhh8Sh12FM wDNcLoFBJr/DJgqpau8eI4SiSekzreX5yoKRWE3go8mNqAwLsyuqpegLumTNycrS4kew zg== Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gpymbg6a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08DNtv0o100782; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:13 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33hm2vx2uv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:13 +0000 Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08DNuBRF022675; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:11 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Drew Adams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5044.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130222 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130222 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > >>From emacs -Q, when I use C-c C-c to send a bug report, it used to just > > ask me how to send it, with "mail client" being the default. > > > > Now it asks me whether > host>.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me is really my email > > address. When I say no, it just ends the interaction. >=20 > It asks you to edit the From address, which you should do. (But it > should place point on the From line instead of leaving it at the end of > the buffer; I've now fixed this on the trunk.) I should not have to do that each time. No. > > This is a regression. >=20 > Nope. I believe it is. I don't see it in any earlier Emacs release. > > What's more, after I edit that default From field to provide my email > > address, it asks whether I want to save this. I answer yes, but it > > makes no difference. Another M-x report-emacs-bug, at least in the > > same session, shows that it still uses that default From text. >=20 > It doesn't ask me that. Perhaps you're thinking of the next question > you're getting -- which mail transport to use? No. That's a separate question. That one I expect, and that one I get also in earlier releases. And after going through the whole thing once (including answering whether I want to save the updated email address), the next time in the same session I don't get that do-you-want-to-save-it question. But even after saying I wanted to save it, I still get, in the same session, the same old . i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me address, and not the edited and saved address. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 19:58:14 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2020 23:58:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbsr-0005Zt-U2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:58:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbsp-0005Zf-K2 for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:58:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dEdIAXK19jGKVC43Cpek1z5qdrrw3BZvU7MqAiuljVA=; b=JPcLiqbNASS4Q/1go9BY0CJZqJ z7jLWnQ12PqUmx61zDQ9p91LxfiyKJr5KnMYqfeMkSMg1CmH1TWmHiJVa0ORE5RYFImz+UOlEibId ThfyOZL0DDRjgVbz0p9LDIhIJFi8JViMlN9A9McvqIfVX8TUIg66XAlAJ1sZNxsB7+hs=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHbsg-0001OW-GB; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:58:05 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEX8/PXl3tOpnJhi V1mHd3c3LzT///98Xaj6AAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+QJDRceJThXF/UAAAGqSURBVDjL bdRtdqwgDAZgHL3/xdMF1JAuoIQsoAQ3ILL/rdzgV/F08m98Tl5InBljjuqstRN5e5R+Nma8AYRu 0CcnjNbiQuMv2NFcaY7zZ3eDaUCoge4Gg9J2/EaZSfJo3sGL8mjfRb24BdOA8Pf4pqOzjijOf8FO mBLRfK7khgkgKYjvntAhgAtCFJ7X7SxEXaJQpie8wHkF+guRc31eslxznDNEl+udCslspwYGjxso MKZvi80cQ3TbVAHQHx326nAbop6d0mqhObz/cRtUIAkwNzBEyQqcKSDExxm86cUqQIzN1gfgNbqj I0DT0QMHqvclQgptFLBP4CgQpQOuyRVAs3xdZHgsUTuCAoo8onooIMJFzxBeH1Dn88wqnOsbPFfS 44oYflzdPOXmZ9A7j0Cgz4NIbt55BZcraOK2R10Q01J0iqCw7lHmgm0pmbIHlPURFb2C6JjpgDPq 4ytEnUK/PiBLC6+FcB+vhH3AO2rQZXApmWvcA/iAUjw9oOcoZa9EvDXwLwAfQLm0MAQsZ3GIzYAD uhsiNPBydEHxbUc3zXDV+e/zvrr/z5Nz6RlXsqsAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjAtMDkt MTNUMjM6MzA6MzYrMDA6MDBUqHglAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIwLTA5LTEzVDIzOjMw OjM2KzAwOjAwJfXAmQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Rema Rema's _Fond Reflections (1): Wheel in the Roses (Extended)_: "Murdermuzic" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:58:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Drew Adams writes: >> > What's more, after I edit that default From field to provide my email >> > address, it asks whether I want to save this. I answer yes, but it >> > makes no difference. Another M-x report-emacs-bu [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: >> > What's more, after I edit that default From field to provide my email >> > address, it asks whether I want to save this. I answer yes, but it >> > makes no difference. Another M-x report-emacs-bug, at least in the >> > same session, shows that it still uses that default From text. >> >> It doesn't ask me that. Perhaps you're thinking of the next question >> you're getting -- which mail transport to use? > > No. That's a separate question. That one I expect, > and that one I get also in earlier releases. > > And after going through the whole thing once > (including answering whether I want to save the > updated email address), the next time in the same > session I don't get that do-you-want-to-save-it > question. What is the question it asks you, exactly? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 20:12:02 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 00:12:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHc6E-0005tz-JD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:12:02 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:55492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHc6C-0005tT-7i for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:12:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E062BW188777; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=JUntXEa/T2mWPP1/HuOF4NjQ+CCBH2aaE8SIuNHSFAY=; b=z3xo1gQgg1YxNlqd0wxiUrZahK9U2scXkLs/NhlfKNehdgnE4uc8jCZPK8twz8LLzvgv Peyc1m/qA+SnVjf0uC3jfHyH91dRtjbosJ3JkK3lTf4sraSdGQVV8xPTd8f8eJIefsgC lxv3iQfkw8N4Ol4YFAUWHv+0vl/PDroO0lU6byGh511M7pOnNXp0zNtZnB9zt5n8ZTBh 1h8/2G/VLO5O8T8tw2rEt6afM17vWjycxAyoearjVg3V85uV8CFRwos5sDNcbsqn/JDM y3lhepfPpxGJeXJJojBtT9CDHg7A49uQlc2yyvXbS1gLZK7hE7YHsNjyvC3jICDUco5e zg== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gnrqkmbw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E05poJ107619; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:52 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33h7wk6vgt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:52 +0000 Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08E0Bnwu020847; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:51 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Drew Adams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5044.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=984 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130224 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=994 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009130224 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > What is the question it asks you, exactly? "Save this mail sending choice? (y or n)" That's posed after I edit the address, try C-c C-c again, and tell it I want to use "mail client". It correctly pops up my mail client's (Outlook) new mail window (where I can paste the bug report text). But in Emacs I get that follow-up prompt asking whether to save the mail sending choice. I think when I filed the bug report I was misremembering the question to be about saving the email address instead of saving my choice of "mail client". In any case, in Emacs 26.3 (and prior), even though the From has that crazy text, when I use C-c C-c and tell Emacs to use my mail client, the mail client window pops up perfectly, and yes, my mail client knows what my email address is. The buffer *sent mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org* still has the crazy From text, but Emacs doesn't bother me. C-c C-c and saying "mail client" is sufficient. I'm not prevented from filling out a mail message in my client and sending it. Nothing annoying in Emacs 26.3 (or prior). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 20:18:36 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 00:18:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCa-00064n-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:18:36 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCX-00064U-Ld for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:18:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fRKPsT6gr+XficZEm4hP3q7TRvEToCzK07NT9h/eMrU=; b=df7if7kxh5oupmc1mn1D5oCHdd Iz+u+JvQR/1spAxP0yw048fUjBxpSrJQ99v3CD1AijXCW9SNEv4Iv1G10qKDhNhr2zU92i0feaBZw 9H1/kSDpkMObXbG0iVj0w6suuIdVWAOZk/0iuekEbpAFHw9yA4CobI4KIyE3tpQrzaYs=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCO-0001bP-Bf; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:27 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAMFBMVEUaGBomIyQ2MTId HCFaUUwhHiAhHB4ODA42Ih5kSjqRcVeAWTtPMSypjW60nIX///8gj8uoAAAAAWJLR0QPGLoA2QAA AAd0SU1FB+QJDgAQCZ/QTIMAAAGKSURBVDjLdZA/T8JAGMbfivwzDFbTwcHBi6MmJP0CSjo5lZDr XIZ2cqiDsjgwkejooDjwAYhonI0Di8QB3KkeH4BEP4PXFo732uMZru3zu+ee9woaUehA3wXtkFhp l8sGzbKsU/5OdmJXj2V4wMFiDxalEYBm2ne8Kge1TMBzAaKEVasjt27YTuTDBa9IQLJS348DcEls TzeoQfksfHuyO9IV0Q2HUqpzxn0XAVKAgsdtp6kbtvAhIITvyvuO4xV0cBFIHjzl3jyNPyGrgv94 9N5RAG1jUBlA5iheUz45/wHVUXvk+hW2FeB2PnlQJeArDIdK8ML6bWXHbP48El/VFcjP2PfH8iOH gMb+uq4K5Fk47qgAPLOBr+qoMDbF5eKXlHqz33tVAo7ZtK3sKL91xXvOxFdE05oSOFtNazYw6PVF RE5MQlFuonH5WAhIiX02VJdvhSMRaMigLRIS2EQdEijdrbkHmlAuR2qsA2sTZi5ai61YQZACCz+W dFQLC4rBEhRbaS3OzIJY/3sEjAf8ow9GAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIwLTA5LTE0VDAw OjE2OjA5KzAwOjAw2ECWvwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMC0wOS0xNFQwMDoxNjowOSsw MDowMKkdLgMAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Melanie de Biasio's _No Deal_: "Sweet Darling Pain" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:11:48 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Drew Adams writes: >> What is the question it asks you, exactly? > > "Save this mail sending choice? (y or n)" Yes, that's about saving the MTA setup, and has nothing to do with the From address. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: >> What is the question it asks you, exactly? > > "Save this mail sending choice? (y or n)" Yes, that's about saving the MTA setup, and has nothing to do with the >From address. > In any case, in Emacs 26.3 (and prior), even > though the From has that crazy text, when I use > C-c C-c and tell Emacs to use my mail client, > the mail client window pops up perfectly, and > yes, my mail client knows what my email address > is. The buffer *sent mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org* > still has the crazy From text, but Emacs doesn't > bother me. Emacs now requires that the From address is valid, as you've discovered. (Sending bug reports from an "emacs -Q" is a pretty strange choice anyway, but that's up to you.) Things seem to be working as designed, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 20:18:45 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 00:18:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCi-000658-MW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:18:45 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCg-00064v-Cr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:18:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aiTuxUpPTZnk7GbIwvFi8O/BWdlCP05B3eK0aYCh9vE=; b=p32OBRSJAsPwkZc5qyPeL2mFtI W/IG6V8EdFpm0tcaBpAaJE+EkN+wmuzwQhEN+6UqvgCMcgtT//qxnwNzhufC+zNbdqGi436dAp3HM s/Zi8b0v+pYFkzvX17j9nk2sfGg3lbubcvdwkd7IRi9oh3iv6DYqmcz0vP9di8SaCpAI=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcCY-0001bY-PH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:36 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:33 +0200 Message-Id: <87363ldxd2.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43386 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 43386 notabug close 43386 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 43386 notabug close 43386 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 20:30:04 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 00:30:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcNf-0006NA-UI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:30:04 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:56126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHcNb-0006L2-4n for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:30:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E0PkoC093836; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=n/oUr/B3AWz3u5jVUCvUNU7qUklYKphzGAJeBB1SyM4=; b=nNrjwFT0Db2Gknk7+oq/rkGzL1dvoQXKCRA4NeprHIkX072wPhcw5zJXDvhVKXwSH5N8 tNMSQJjEXMIeongLVuTdzcV/+o7RylnJWYkNZU2YLySi12O7MuN36cxxapeFbOVuZ6jv IvpihKyGHea6KOisjTrDppzvWJtrky4Y7uanGb9FPPKWvFKUdGMTaZpQJ8jJ007ay+wZ gSYY2ukjvQSyhz+ilZ/I1yjrCwknxPAJ4yRa6HCzeIK8wEqQ8tLhqLtR3xs6XmdIHAys KdbZgeEUVVMbspmmAJIRgnGZBfImoYNQzOCQxPn5Kvx189tIpc+Sshgyy+YCkPQ8FZT7 Kw== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gpymbheh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08E0PJqS137414; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:52 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33h87yqarc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:52 +0000 Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 08E0TpCR016909; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:51 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <33907263-dc08-42e9-8906-65c39c669cb4@default> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:29:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Drew Adams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5044.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009140002 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9743 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009140002 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > >> What is the question it asks you, exactly? > > > > "Save this mail sending choice? (y or n)" >=20 > Yes, that's about saving the MTA setup, and has nothing to do with the > From address. >=20 > > In any case, in Emacs 26.3 (and prior), even > > though the From has that crazy text, when I use > > C-c C-c and tell Emacs to use my mail client, > > the mail client window pops up perfectly, and > > yes, my mail client knows what my email address > > is. The buffer *sent mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org* > > still has the crazy From text, but Emacs doesn't > > bother me. >=20 > Emacs now requires that the From address is valid, as you've > discovered. (Sending bug reports from an "emacs -Q" is a pretty strange > choice anyway, but that's up to you.) >=20 > Things seem to be working as designed, so I'm closing this bug report. That makes no sense whatsoever. IF a user says to use THE MAIL CLIENT then it's up to the user to provide the From field TO THE MAIL CLIENT. And typically the mail client will always prefill that field correctly - the client knows the user. This is a ridiculous annoyance. My guess is that whoever implemented this did not take into account the use case of sending via THE MAIL CLIENT. The mail client makes NO USE of the From field from Emacs. (At least mine makes no use of it.) Please DTRT, and fix this regression. And yes, there are good reasons to sometimes submit a bug report using emacs -Q. I don't usually do that, but sometimes I do. Emacs should certainly NOT assume that there's NO reason for it to support sending a report from emacs -Q. It's never done that, and it never should. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 14 10:58:35 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 14:58:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHpwA-0008RE-SJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHpw9-0008R0-Sz for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHpw4-0006SW-FL; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:28 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2214 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kHpvz-0001KF-9N; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:58:27 +0300 Message-Id: <831rj4be24.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:23 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 02:18:23 +0200 > Cc: 43386@debbugs.gnu.org > > > In any case, in Emacs 26.3 (and prior), even > > though the From has that crazy text, when I use > > C-c C-c and tell Emacs to use my mail client, > > the mail client window pops up perfectly, and > > yes, my mail client knows what my email address > > is. The buffer *sent mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org* > > still has the crazy From text, but Emacs doesn't > > bother me. > > Emacs now requires that the From address is valid, as you've > discovered. (Sending bug reports from an "emacs -Q" is a pretty strange > choice anyway, but that's up to you.) > > Things seem to be working as designed, so I'm closing this bug report. I think Drew is right here: we have a bug on our hands. Look at the code: ;; Query the user for the SMTP method, so that we can skip ;; questions about From header validity if the user is going to ;; use mailclient, anyway. (when (or (and (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (eq message-send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once)) (and (not (derived-mode-p 'message-mode)) (eq send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once))) (sendmail-query-user-about-smtp) (when (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (setq message-send-mail-function (message-default-send-mail-function)))) (or report-emacs-bug-no-confirmation ;; mailclient.el does not need a valid From (if (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (eq message-send-mail-function 'message-send-mail-with-mailclient) (eq send-mail-function 'mailclient-send-it)) ;; Not narrowing to the headers, but that's OK. (let ((from (mail-fetch-field "From"))) (when (and (or (not from) (message-bogus-recipient-p from) ;; This is the default user-mail-address. On ;; today's systems, it seems more likely to ;; be wrong than right, since most people ;; don't run their own mail server. (string-match (format "\\<%s@%s\\>" (regexp-quote (user-login-name)) (regexp-quote (system-name))) from)) (not (yes-or-no-p (format-message "Is `%s' really your email address? " from)))) As you see, we _know_ that mailclient.el doesn't care about the faux >From address, and we have some logic to detect when this is the case. But that logic doesn't work, because the conditions fail to match: (when (or (and (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (eq message-send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once)) (and (not (derived-mode-p 'message-mode)) (eq send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once))) (sendmail-query-user-about-smtp) (when (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (setq message-send-mail-function (message-default-send-mail-function)))) The call to sendmail-query-user-about-smtp is the one that asks about how to send, and allows to select mailclient. But the conditions to call it are false, and the rest is history. I think this breakage is somehow related to our attempt to clean up the sendmail.el/message.el mess. So I suggest to look at how things are supposed to work when message-mode is used by default, and see why we miss the question about mailclient before asking about the From address. From unknown Thu Aug 14 20:53:42 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:11:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 14 12:15:14 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 16:15:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHr8M-0000ER-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:15:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHr8K-0000EE-NT for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:15:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tt6ppjBviVWKuoUNH/JpUL5H8Df/H1dq/S3qzqNgCT0=; b=UTitO50hHz1bQCeKEgR61/2ttI l7qBxWRAYHC8Uk7L5t2lTmXIlVCoSBh/IdudjrAZcmgv+Ww5ojwn/JK/CmuSXYUxB/xyYKdPz9cCM Ua2gCGG3XBseSTkuzZXZmi/sQqwrHQiaN6UoO9qrvDkg8x0cMUoCPPpTmDO3bgK3PuTg=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHr8B-0003NX-7j; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:15:05 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> <831rj4be24.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEU5OVBPa6ESDxP/ //+1cIoRAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+QJDg8jB4dfQ4kAAAGmSURBVCjPLZIxa+NAEIVH izcYVU7wpnClCC745leE44qgSiwac6S/Rr9CEbYxKlOkXokYxu9X3my4bZaPeW+H9yTynZSUT0uO XD0gn5M0ROXFv2YQiYn4XaICN5HDQBikQ8IsIhm6wMong0SgjTSYgkFlUEg07X/wZsoW2X+D9Nki NaHy4tZBKBgo+TjO0hmA9ME3n1d5Id+BbnfEZy9kApt0pAgdUehB2BI4vBjAAGNqMrQMYoxzDETF K+fJonFjSVGCnAXbho3dowFb5E1LpSaQmSq/3RacYQvo/TF0eExsRuDyI0TdTUxOS+Dp770JSht8 AD9/i4Ez+OSJl2iCbHmcdNL1k7BVpQeAcfqTG8XtgAVLaEPu7fkAZ1W1vrN2nBxRdqH1UWkcinra SGjef4GmY1618q5yoJRBLc/eYtsTpZ5W9lUMKrbLEy91niwl0tE5W2wdJCT3ZQBF9g2DRmUo52y1 8p11Mz7QyBfG7jqOmBItu2XuzzPnf4Gas57e0q3/hvZZw9sN/YKCaWX72zXbGmtq2VfXZsmqqaFU 1PMevT09x38EednopTs0ZQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMC0wOS0xNFQxNTozNTowNysw MDowMLsEvUUAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjAtMDktMTRUMTU6MzU6MDcrMDA6MDDKWQX5 AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Matmos's _Plastic Anniversary_: "Collapse Of The Fourth Kingdom" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:15:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831rj4be24.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:58:27 +0300") Message-ID: <87y2lcs5bu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The call to sendmail-query-user-about-smtp is the one that asks about > how to send, and allows to select mailclient. But the conditions to > call it are false, and the rest is history. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > The call to sendmail-query-user-about-smtp is the one that asks about > how to send, and allows to select mailclient. But the conditions to > call it are false, and the rest is history. Yes, it's due to commit 3a59cc84069376802ba8fd731b524d78db58262c Author: Stefan Monnier AuthorDate: Tue Jul 30 16:37:01 2019 -0400 * lisp/gnus/message.el: Reduce redundancy with send-mail-function which changed the default of message-send-mail-function. However, even with that fixed, the code there is misguided. emacsbug queries for the method: (when (or (and (derived-mode-p 'message-mode) (eq message-send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once)) (and (not (derived-mode-p 'message-mode)) (eq send-mail-function 'sendmail-query-once))) (sendmail-query-user-about-smtp) but doesn't do anything with it -- sendmail-query-user-about-smtp just returns a function. This is how that function is supposed to be used: (defun sendmail-query-once () "Query for `send-mail-function' and send mail with it. This also saves the value of `send-mail-function' via Customize." ;; If send-mail-function is already setup, we're incorrectly called ;; a second time, probably because someone's using an old value ;; of send-mail-function. (if (not (eq send-mail-function #'sendmail-query-once)) (funcall send-mail-function) (let ((function (sendmail-query-user-about-smtp))) (funcall function) (when (y-or-n-p "Save this mail sending choice?") (setq send-mail-function function) (customize-save-variable 'send-mail-function function))))) Notice that we offer to set it -- after we've seen that the user can send successfully, which we can't do from that hook. So to make this work sensibly requires some refactoring of the code. I'll have a look at it tomorrowish. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 15 09:28:16 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2020 13:28:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB0J-0007qp-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:28:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB0H-0007qY-Bc for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:28:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xbICIhQdQp19hi+e3hcPMWG8PvsODCsrddgVrOzEKCY=; b=l4cAEiQPgn7N+h74m1vgUJRXI7 1yqjEvIo2t8kVievKN0kqMaDSj4LuEE6pN5EJDz5PvQW5S3F+HHZpVapmavyNNNKwfs2pGKDa8XsJ aESplvfkiZ12aiXsnXmBl8YPQrkOK1qVf3LX2MyfXQHF1e8A82i/2PevvC7d+BGI+Nj4=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB07-0000gu-QV; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> <831rj4be24.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2lcs5bu.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Saito Koji's _433-1_: "433_025" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2lcs5bu.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:15:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1r3890d.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So to make this work sensibly requires some refactoring of the code. > I'll have a look at it tomorrowish. Now done. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So to make this work sensibly requires some refactoring of the code. > I'll have a look at it tomorrowish. Now done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 15 09:28:20 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2020 13:28:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB0O-0007r6-5v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:28:20 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB0M-0007qg-Q7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:28:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mq2OS6l86YRluJv3pIOc+jExXfU+JKjhXx0tGa0gLig=; b=L0ja7P6ZYY1EYN8l/2J8Anb4M4 MdUqr4Pv66fiQY50VKSOM8EaIXg+Vca9FEkVX9PQJYgAaWMAq0Xkft2ZZYsBUCx7eRWkDm02TJnk6 yVrx2GsNGU4MTzg4IqobecHRf8748sMsaABxReih9ECtnb/MjsspA/kWekKTB1eikI6E=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIB0F-0000h1-2E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:09 +0200 Message-Id: <87pn6n8906.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43386 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 43386 fixed close 43386 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 43386 fixed close 43386 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 15 10:51:48 2020 Received: (at 43386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2020 14:51:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60107 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kICJA-0006Uq-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:51:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kICJ8-0006Ud-Lz for 43386@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:51:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kICJ3-00050Q-0r; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:51:41 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2533 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kICJ2-00031R-H1; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:51:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:51:48 +0300 Message-Id: <83pn6n854r.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87r1r3890d.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:02 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#43386: 27.1; Regression in `report-emacs-bug' References: <9713a95e-00f8-401c-be0f-3d54ad32ee55@default> <874ko1fejh.fsf@gnus.org> <846c2fb0-2b87-4073-a30f-e3eb61217909@default> <878sdddyba.fsf@gnus.org> <6abf2cf3-8105-4f8c-be98-dcbe5fd854f3@default> <874ko1dxdc.fsf@gnus.org> <831rj4be24.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2lcs5bu.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1r3890d.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43386 Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 43386@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 43386@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:28:02 +0200 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > So to make this work sensibly requires some refactoring of the code. > > I'll have a look at it tomorrowish. > > Now done. Thanks! From unknown Thu Aug 14 20:53:42 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator