Subject: [bug#43330] [PATCH 0/6] Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc

From: Ricardo Wurmus <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:39:09 +0200

Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> zimoun <[email-masked]> skribis:
>
>> These patches close #33844 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/33844>.
>> However, the bug number is not mentioned in the commit messages, mimicking
>> previous commit messages doing the same.
>>
>> Note that rapicorn does not build, independently of {ghc-,}pandoc.  See:
>>
>> https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/rapicorn/output-history
>
> Uh.

Rapicorn was only ever used for Beast, which we will likely not be able
to include going forward as they plan to depend on npm things.

>>   gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>>   gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>>   gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>>   gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>>   gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>>   gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>
> It all LGTM; Ricardo, could you confirm this is as intended?

Yes, this looks all fine to me.

-- 
Ricardo