From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 16:04:36 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 20:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41320 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGSo8-0000fx-Lo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:04:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52336) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGSo6-0000fp-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:04:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGSo6-0002uq-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:04:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]:55770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGSo5-0002Va-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:04:34 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id q4so553718pjh.5 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=VQSi6dnlNNqV9VJSyoFeXe9AuDUcf10T0cZdALN6Udw=; b=Ka5kb0f/Fb17uVrRWBdZRB5eP/k+s6g6ijWXjiocmy0uM9holHXhZOFo+NlTXw4pwr s7Z0c8SFg7Ok5tyhQMJvkkMM5TTpp99zRUcjAeF026aqUmcLqV+8BDL2TB5WvF5WJm3T TdzkZl9Y6PJr2ycI6+0ZX2bvOh8CEJMp1Wcd7by2ETrx2DvdaQuIR92Sb3WfaBbbt6BS UbcIXyrSFLZvG2U+lQDWVWSzCVAKpNCCPeszGc5I189vPGEr+HCyNU5Nq3YhxB4/J9+d rfPnOYqz+d/aYNbb5x59mMXq6zJ/rS0wm0AJs/HLlyQwpCYaWH41Z3oNo0vzfyvrHaHo 5pNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version; bh=VQSi6dnlNNqV9VJSyoFeXe9AuDUcf10T0cZdALN6Udw=; b=nPqc4LEN+sSUCOlo1iQCNNgYTVC/cST6RdbVqIPmFb+g3tBpIyHsIL0NUW2tXUBi2q tRUdDxrxR060Dgesh8YM0ozMvVGSYSSOtUZ+ul/24dcACePNnJX8qizYLRdr3tIL1+9B YzYAuVd9y17wmW2m2zeL9msNOTWUZYauNF7ivEHhSRx/hzGU9jnufFv3NH5BrncD4/HU sJs5YdIim9XjbxxbCRON/d5mSsUGzr2N9ujia9XkLDk7spr6x4+pMJ3rflKPhRkj+PKZ DLDDm+4ZAvHYqDvG40qlv4p5eCN0HPE5ViGVDlthrK20WeIi8QGEm1MFIH1lqvbPKFOm vcqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533igCwNA7R8/Q/9C3n/eHhp8kqislDhRu/6FVONb/V7G9qML/pv PYpQwR/3u47rJXRyGn8NZ0v1Rf+4cc6e0RYL X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvSbyMsAe6tOu/0ZlcRd3DNCSpvS09659Y49LWc4ojkHOrpU8RYRbby5ySY/ZD0KEHWP6Ntw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1903:: with SMTP id 3mr1564882pjg.74.1599768269762; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trevormurphy-glaptop2 ([2601:1c1:8a80:1620::2342]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e207sm6555952pfh.171.2020.09.10.13.04.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:29 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.8; emacs 27.1 From: Trevor Murphy To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Missing command `font-lock-refontify` in Emacs 27.1 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030; envelope-from=trevormurphy@google.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1030.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I think this is actually a documentation bug, but it seriously confused me for a while today. The NEWS file states that 27.1 includes a new convenience command `font-lock-refontify`. However, um, 27.1 doesn't. Try saying M-x find-function RET font-lock-refontify RET to see what I mean. It seems that commit c5fd4d373ed6d80b744951afe13e50070bff41cf renamed the command to `font-lock-debug-fontify`, but this change didn't make it into the NEWS file. I'm not sure what's the best thing to do about this, but I figured I'd report it anyway to start a conversation. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 16:54:16 2020 Received: (at 43319) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 20:54:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41382 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTaB-0001rW-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:54:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTaA-0001rJ-5m for 43319@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:54:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UzvWljlorGrzdJRb30OcPBF2RiD4qKR2rHlRI6+vfeI=; b=JWOvULq9yuaxeKid9eMrwTOW+q eT/Sxn0bihr0wP0ATsP3/F0yDeNIYlF6KT80jX9kppSdKeBmW4xuksrPUtTiO9bfvecGiQsNnjXcw ecoDI+WFlLSamTaIqxMtxTty4yqJmd5L8QVfgOxfOHBWxchtZJ7If63UA0HXJaMWNqWg=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTa1-000297-Ep; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:54:08 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Trevor Murphy Subject: Re: bug#43319: Missing command `font-lock-refontify` in Emacs 27.1 References: X-Now-Playing: Jon Eberson Group's _City Visions_: "This Is Your Life" Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:54:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Trevor Murphy's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:27 -0700") Message-ID: <874ko55p5f.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Trevor Murphy writes: > I think this is actually a documentation bug, but it seriously > confused me for a while today. > > The NEWS file states that 27.1 includes a new convenience command > `font-lock-refontify`. However [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43319 Cc: 43319@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Trevor Murphy writes: > I think this is actually a documentation bug, but it seriously > confused me for a while today. > > The NEWS file states that 27.1 includes a new convenience command > `font-lock-refontify`. However, um, 27.1 doesn't. Try saying M-x > find-function RET font-lock-refontify RET to see what I mean. > > It seems that commit c5fd4d373ed6d80b744951afe13e50070bff41cf renamed > the command to `font-lock-debug-fontify`, but this change didn't make > it into the NEWS file. Yup. I've now updated the NEWS file in the emacs-27 branch, so when Emacs 27.2 is released, this should be fixed there. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 16:54:22 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 20:54:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTaI-0001rr-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:54:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTaG-0001rU-ER for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:54:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sRuo56pGM8nk3zB0qUZjIfbkQU7U0VmhLmvASuGceNc=; b=eHjAS9WGQQhWjuVCnFCZEmJV+H cKX5CqcQ0YQUc8xYKnoe+3Psl4Kvz7zgdko45HwwgBG6gIwYTl5efqCMfHaGFYgIo3gIZT2826aAI e1cBC4Od9I73/RxMEClGIUTV3OCTA9UOgcHcYyBbXZUFuWnqAldehUHzN4ssKZNyt4TI=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTa8-00029E-Ms for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:54:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:54:11 +0200 Message-Id: <87363p5p58.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43319 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 43319 fixed close 43319 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 43319 fixed close 43319 28.1 quit From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:09:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator