From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 09:40:45 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 13:40:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37716 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMoe-0000wK-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:40:45 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMod-0000wD-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:40:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMod-0000Pi-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:40:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:37211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMoa-0001V6-Ti for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:40:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id z4so6776502wrr.4 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:40:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyjtBKg8xFmNBsPwN+Ymd0I7Y3cZQ1xUAQf7Ehqga6I=; b=b75ByQNduniITtlQYxq1G15Wufc9X0D2CcrkUIlc6vEtDE9mygRW9SmZaYk5jJnAn1 SXeYRm6Qssefbu5vRh6jDG8FD6CRe8/OEROY65cCQkh4YHfkO5R/f/Xsd+VtQI+4DI54 yrs1aXMbmDlv2sFTfZvJM/eyQ8SHTzkQ8mL8lEv59Wt/6qplJEyFlak/p80tNgdTkkrK P1RapRTTpP55cQsJ3az70krH8OwKfPD8hrLGa439rWuSRmB5Oc0ALStoptLkFaL06cyu ZBjBDN/iyPl6e2TwbQil4G5fjTuR8NmuKrK0IeVHIBz7kfZiJcVn3leH5NGBffv8NDtd N7hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyjtBKg8xFmNBsPwN+Ymd0I7Y3cZQ1xUAQf7Ehqga6I=; b=I+olfCX8/gcwEo5/Rk79kkbeIgSuEGLpWwlDQUTzYGXtGSnSB1zL/3Zxj9jZEFDk+Q qcTBkgNrU98JG26kX076t0C0TlVvduKE9rV88GsvjDnK5VDDczF172k+u90zyoL9NEeS SrWR8xa6y8fvyDYC9Is1ny06xzR0axv9YjYaWN7H8GB/gx3DkuLtpxHgOdhqcujlFlGn hO6SBAEcde1Nd6LSgrJB2M8C4YKXV32Lf/j++fgvljC/Di9EmBODdNOmT488LuaRz5El ShxpZVAJhDf3h/Asqi3rJsO08MJPLYdsFOMpoMjmLhBo/uNSEW9MhCVmu3XYkZSs1sMX /zmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327BX6U02WsnrVfNWhehCNScXR+mBisHFEiR2jjtQWRishmfK0v 9aGWqJ/HPL70/l8TUeFZSX8MiLmN4iiosA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSKZqAn8l4nwSl4ORygp9phYwkirnB1qNzl+oo//s0PMOFBKy857cKwsD7koQdqX3Ul5Zeww== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a49:: with SMTP id v9mr5054825wrs.153.1599745238639; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phst-desktop.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:10:f693:9fff:feef:93c0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm4452607wma.0.2020.09.10.06.40.37 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:40:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Philipp Stephani To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::436; envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x436.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) The signature for `diff-no-select' is: (diff-no-select OLD NEW &optional SWITCHES NO-ASYNC BUF) Its docstring refers to `diff' for the meaning of the arguments, but `diff' doesn't take an argument, so BUF is undocumented. Probably `diff-no-select' should also document that the return value is BUF if BUF is non-nil. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 6, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20, c= airo version 1.16.0) of 2020-09-10 Repository revision: 5d522b430bd5ecfb8f082906cd634883dbb68f3e Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12008000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux rodete Configured using: 'configure --enable-gcc-warnings=3Dwarn-only --enable-gtk-deprecation-warnings --without-pop --with-mailutils --enable-checking=3Dall --enable-check-lisp-object-type --with-modules 'CFLAGS=3D-O1 -ggdb3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsanitize=3Daddress -fsanitize=3Dundefined'' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG CAIRO SOUND DBUS GSETTINGS GLIB NOTIFY INOTIFY LIBSELINUX GNUTLS FREETYPE HARFBUZZ ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 XDBE XIM MODULES THREADS LIBSYSTEMD JSON PDUMPER Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.utf8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec epa epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs text-property-search time-date mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils phst skeleton derived edmacro kmacro pcase ffap thingatpt url url-proxy url-privacy url-expand url-methods url-history url-cookie url-domsuf url-util url-parse auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map url-vars mailcap subr-x rx gnutls puny seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv dbus xml compile comint ansi-color ring cl-loaddefs cl-lib tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting cairo move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 70103 5731) (symbols 48 8619 1) (strings 32 23908 2163) (string-bytes 1 780262) (vectors 16 14608) (vector-slots 8 195365 11437) (floats 8 26 31) (intervals 56 225 0) (buffers 992 11)) --=20 Google Germany GmbH Erika-Mann-Stra=C3=9Fe 33 80636 M=C3=BCnchen Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese f=C3=A4lschlicherweise erhal= ten haben sollten, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht an jemand anderes weiter, l=C3=B6sche= n Sie alle Kopien und Anh=C3=A4nge davon und lassen Sie mich bitte wissen, dass d= ie E-Mail an die falsche Person gesendet wurde. This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by mistake, please don=E2=80=99t forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 17:04:28 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 21:04:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTk3-0004IV-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:04:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTk1-0004IF-O8 for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:04:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jatqWs5dFYRZrtqdtswndcwL6shvrjBkg2/jJejOzUQ=; b=PqMaBpBqJsKjbgovA/nshjel9Y O26Ofi1A9ESdVXQTHS+hI1hIqPXkTPriPaIu0tsM76IPQziKQ06eco+xl23h4P+tuX1QA1rDf1g/w l45LL+u/3V2uuTTrWU08eU9APva9rxMD018r5Iz27ol/lPQuHD6LzwsO1MGuI5HJxKKA=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTjs-0002ER-1m; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philipp Stephani Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: X-Now-Playing: Jon Eberson Group's _City Visions_: "We Where The Ones" Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:40:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Philipp Stephani writes: > The signature for `diff-no-select' is: > > (diff-no-select OLD NEW &optional SWITCHES NO-ASYNC BUF) > > Its docstring refers to `diff' for the meaning of the arguments, but > `diff' doesn't take an [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Philipp Stephani writes: > The signature for `diff-no-select' is: > > (diff-no-select OLD NEW &optional SWITCHES NO-ASYNC BUF) > > Its docstring refers to `diff' for the meaning of the arguments, but > `diff' doesn't take an argument, so BUF is undocumented. > > Probably `diff-no-select' should also document that the return value is > BUF if BUF is non-nil. I've now amended the doc string of the function on Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 17:04:32 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 21:04:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTk8-0004Il-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:04:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTk6-0004IM-Up for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:04:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gfm4h4vN9ZjhuAuMJi/IfxLR4ZzJT0kSJGQBS5CcPF0=; b=D9poae1fVXQ+FsoseBIk70aFUZ LlX/WLdoVYP0eS2vT8SqyfdU7u+Mm4X7/7utzPii8Y4ufFKLr2V30J0adP5hVo3YsFuZOn5xDCUiA rRCkH5CUN+NyvK5vqwF/SoNqjL2US4MDZTLwNAALjDo2lu6oWm34dIV3CFPSpt/Ob/Y8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGTjy-0002Ea-TW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:25 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:21 +0200 Message-Id: <87pn6t4a3u.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43307 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 43307 fixed close 43307 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 43307 fixed close 43307 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 02:07:56 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 06:07:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGcE0-000740-ON for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:07:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGcDz-00073n-2e for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:07:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGcDt-00088R-PP; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:07:49 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1634 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGcDs-00044w-LT; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:07:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:07:54 +0300 Message-Id: <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:14 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 23:04:14 +0200 > Cc: 43307@debbugs.gnu.org > > Philipp Stephani writes: > > > The signature for `diff-no-select' is: > > > > (diff-no-select OLD NEW &optional SWITCHES NO-ASYNC BUF) > > > > Its docstring refers to `diff' for the meaning of the arguments, but > > `diff' doesn't take an argument, so BUF is undocumented. > > > > Probably `diff-no-select' should also document that the return value is > > BUF if BUF is non-nil. > > I've now amended the doc string of the function on Emacs 28. Thanks, but please backport this to the release branch, as doc changes should be installed there. Also, the new doc string of diff-no-select uses too much of passive tense; can we improve that? And finally, the SWITCHES argument is left semi-documented, since the doc string of 'diff' doesn't tell what happens in non-interactive calls if SWITCHES is specified, and doesn't say what should be its form in that case. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 08:28:02 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:28:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGi9q-0006IU-71 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:28:02 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50680) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGi9n-0006Hz-8X for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:28:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TjRWyqdvs1BETAkds2QNgUjiw+poCmH0+fEBpzk7GEg=; b=E0eOtvyzdUnib8QfTOa44gpbwB Ig0HM71irCjK/vKI/40hC5+K+Yav9ZUvW6cPriTIpmSvmuKyT709EpjrQXIlTzsEs3hYNajN7LBQ0 59DM6Z8cB43duedF4L5i7mMQ3NJiLJ439cZssF9fxT0FW1i4D+z/Drvfq7kBSUB0RMZ4=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGi9e-0001yo-4U; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:27:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEUMCQckKCFbXFjN 0s2doJyAm38xYxxIii/////FnjXSAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+QJCwwOAXuO8jgAAAGt SURBVDjLtZNBr5wgEMcZtT0zT59nBTa9tq5urwra88s+d/f6vOC5TQpfv7DdvABteuskQJwf/5lh EEII/jbmpxaRkncD73p8h/5/WsYbwh76JgSyeClG58woKcNgHz57DctKRpkIBflIpKqELLngKehy 3ihezSUPQdGB4mq+lMotUXJ1djVRCgQA4nJL+cUt7I/j8bz1wA+MgMhnFGw4STmxWJKraj0Np2Ho hhhUufo29MPXruNx8p4dh2VZbre5jRVI1fWqvaWF4fNy1dYaqyM3EPS7rbNYgljf3bvZMAGod6vT /f7W6107YPY3SIA2DhiXZ4MEbFojaLuhjsG9d7V2fh0n9/NHg6Q2YX6Ae5Ha4Xo3NFLQR0z9d1D7 00T1wrvfmuSITgL3Zn2PuwsbBa3Nbj+9xaCtt911xP6wcbeeWl+P3S/nJNJKni+39ecyy+QGJchZ vc7yOCWp+7WfuRq645iAVSI+sVZMSaSsQTd8DSRJMbVE+taMQEMNdJX7o2E6y0WwMH1ZuhBjJqW4 HOZQUbKeFn13EJId4hfl3xJSJMkpHlY0gpL/YL8AJH1codXpGjkAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjAtMDktMTFUMTI6MTQ6MDErMDA6MDBoUIHOAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIwLTA5 LTExVDEyOjE0OjAxKzAwOjAwGQ05cgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Laraaji & Lyghte's _Celestial Realms_: "Equinox" Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:27:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:07:54 +0300") Message-ID: <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Also, the new doc string of diff-no-select uses too much of passive > tense; can we improve that? I've taken a what of it. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Also, the new doc string of diff-no-select uses too much of passive > tense; can we improve that? I've taken a what of it. > And finally, the SWITCHES argument is left semi-documented, since the > doc string of 'diff' doesn't tell what happens in non-interactive > calls if SWITCHES is specified, and doesn't say what should be its > form in that case. I've now removed the punting to diff and just explained the options in this doc string. > Thanks, but please backport this to the release branch, as doc changes > should be installed there. If the final result now looks OK, I can backport it. It didn't seem important enough (it's an internal function) to me, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 08:38:01 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiJV-0006Yn-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:38:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiJT-0006YS-Qe for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:38:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiJO-0001fX-IA; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:37:54 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1934 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiJN-00084f-Dt; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:37:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:37:50 +0300 Message-Id: <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:27:48 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:27:48 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Also, the new doc string of diff-no-select uses too much of passive > > tense; can we improve that? > > I've taken a what of it. > > > And finally, the SWITCHES argument is left semi-documented, since the > > doc string of 'diff' doesn't tell what happens in non-interactive > > calls if SWITCHES is specified, and doesn't say what should be its > > form in that case. > > I've now removed the punting to diff and just explained the options in > this doc string. > > > Thanks, but please backport this to the release branch, as doc changes > > should be installed there. > > If the final result now looks OK, I can backport it. It didn't seem > important enough (it's an internal function) to me, though. I think you forgot to push... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 08:40:35 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:40:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiLz-0006dT-Gw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:40:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiLx-0006dF-On for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:40:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rL24xyecFMcfq/0FfYeYuHC+VBL1WstrtXInl0914TA=; b=a8RFe62xfdezSPzgtmb7cAy14H xYxM6PPG3WxpG+dAaxkRggsHAYEDY59r6Eo2ElztqiZqvz/iH0GSC0boatRM2Dx1OUHW+c+69lJkm giCuvoefvDyBmGF+j8jLYg7MfU96Dvo7pPGAOC43V6b09djbIrSRaxn7wb7BI+FdnY+U=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiLn-00026K-NI; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:27 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEUMCQckKCFbXFjN 0s2doJyAm38xYxxIii/////FnjXSAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+QJCwwOAXuO8jgAAAGt SURBVDjLtZNBr5wgEMcZtT0zT59nBTa9tq5urwra88s+d/f6vOC5TQpfv7DdvABteuskQJwf/5lh EEII/jbmpxaRkncD73p8h/5/WsYbwh76JgSyeClG58woKcNgHz57DctKRpkIBflIpKqELLngKehy 3ihezSUPQdGB4mq+lMotUXJ1djVRCgQA4nJL+cUt7I/j8bz1wA+MgMhnFGw4STmxWJKraj0Np2Ho hhhUufo29MPXruNx8p4dh2VZbre5jRVI1fWqvaWF4fNy1dYaqyM3EPS7rbNYgljf3bvZMAGod6vT /f7W6107YPY3SIA2DhiXZ4MEbFojaLuhjsG9d7V2fh0n9/NHg6Q2YX6Ae5Ha4Xo3NFLQR0z9d1D7 00T1wrvfmuSITgL3Zn2PuwsbBa3Nbj+9xaCtt911xP6wcbeeWl+P3S/nJNJKni+39ecyy+QGJchZ vc7yOCWp+7WfuRq645iAVSI+sVZMSaSsQTd8DSRJMbVE+taMQEMNdJX7o2E6y0WwMH1ZuhBjJqW4 HOZQUbKeFn13EJId4hfl3xJSJMkpHlY0gpL/YL8AJH1codXpGjkAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjAtMDktMTFUMTI6MTQ6MDErMDA6MDBoUIHOAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIwLTA5 LTExVDEyOjE0OjAxKzAwOjAwGQ05cgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Laraaji & Lyghte's _Celestial Realms_: "Celestial Realms" Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:37:50 +0300") Message-ID: <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think you forgot to push... Indeed. Now pushed. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think you forgot to push... Indeed. Now pushed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 08:48:17 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:48:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTR-0006px-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTP-0006pZ-Fq for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTJ-0003N6-Vo; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:09 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2563 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTJ-0000XS-1Y; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:48:06 +0300 Message-Id: <83363oh43d.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:22 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:22 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think you forgot to push... > > Indeed. Now pushed. Thanks, LGTM. Although I would add that SWITCHES should be a list of command-line switches. And yes, let's backport this to the release branch. I agree that this is not very important, but backporting is easy. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 07:09:19 2020 Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 11:09:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kH3PD-0000VF-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:09:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60800) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kH3PA-0000V2-U5 for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:09:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zu/DZJRiBRj1vW0dEYHo9N58PDSH4Uh87NFCgQAN1gg=; b=R7orYVf3obR7QUuI7Wp1UTImHC SVjrzqlu8MZp4hwLCpecmEbVtkAax0FX1tfwq2uSMoXrk1VrI7uscmbt4gEXp0Ujbvi6KMUhg2g3F pKNt2nK9J3lJ9AwVyoNvJUr1fYf4egjQIW2oA0vGuV18k+GRwcFjqLSTuybwfh5K8Lxw=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kH3Oy-0005fl-Bm; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:09:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> <83363oh43d.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXLtaDx6+OIXEnM qU7////Dgg/GAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+QJDAsIK273slQAAAHCSURBVDjLZZQN0q4g CIVRN4C1AS9ugGT/e/sOouU712aq8Qnk5xARU00ifTz1ZxFx4yxYjYnSAZhankBuo9NCqY25b1jP 6UrJt3M3G13rJW3aJyowGCoDFjKBTPCP/DHScmWHK+u5w0KG/R6CELlImwbyc3hJbBHUkN4OIO0W gSubQZ/A1xAk6s8DRHYe+Lx/AOHazInsQcE+0N2Rr24PPP4PSEyzpNcXIZp1TB9ZHgBnzAC2jvcy hkEKiwOcJTHrq6ASILHbwBWqbWVbmBEntNUBOqG3vcAUZSVeoJYD8JsHPN8OFqFVK7ymeiMX/6S/ hGqxB28WxwOof+hgplNH9/wHAsT1BPB1ywQdgoHJAS4L0KdYNATnt2yrjtguAZBoZbQLH8e+A16H F7p8MzSnrjuegLvefSluJU8+BsSqvLfI78kLSTiKNG1QzDitfmiqmsoGRd9GoQKGsFy7RlZWq2im M2i1qmh5legFkLx7mPaIQE44K7cSmRMdYvBS9VWSYh/wKK5t8QmIZleuFsMgIaCYcxdkbk2WtFL1 PwQuqAVVX5KT2CdHmJes3qQ5JPapPfojlJu/7oLsGcR4YIF9qv4DhcN+HZa5VD0AAAAldEVYdGRh dGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjAtMDktMTJUMTE6MDg6NDMrMDA6MDA0NXlvAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlm eQAyMDIwLTA5LTEyVDExOjA4OjQzKzAwOjAwRWjB0wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Joni Mitchell_: "Michael From Mountains" Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:09:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83363oh43d.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:48:06 +0300") Message-ID: <87k0wz45gx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks, LGTM. Although I would add that SWITCHES should be a list of > command-line switches. > > And yes, let's backport this to the release branch. I agree that this > is not very important, but b [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43307 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks, LGTM. Although I would add that SWITCHES should be a list of > command-line switches. > > And yes, let's backport this to the release branch. I agree that this > is not very important, but backporting is easy. Yup; I've now added that bit about SWITCHES and copied to emacs-27. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator