GNU bug report logs -
#43282
tail -c +N / --bytes +N manpage wrong (off by 1)
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 43282 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#43282
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:55:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Martin Taibr" <Taibr <at> seznam.cz>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:55:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Currently the manpage says:
-c, --bytes=[+]NUM
output the last NUM bytes; or use -c +NUM to output starting
with byte NUM of each file
Most (all?) hex editors number bytes from 0 so it's natural to assume tail -
c +0 will print the entire file, tail -c +1 will cut off the first byte and
so on. That's not the case, tail seems to "index" bytes from 1, not 0, so +0
and +1 both print the entire file.
I'd suggest
1) the manpage should mention counting starts from 1 (so you need to add 1
when copy pasting offsets from most other programs)
2) +0 should print a warning since its usage indicates the user likely
thinks tail counts from 0
3) -n / --lines docs should be changed to match (though counting lines from
1 is more common)
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 286 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.