GNU bug report logs - #43252
27.1; DBus properties lack type hints or overrides

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Hugh Daschbach <hugh <at> ccss.com>

Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.1

Done: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Hugh Daschbach <hugh <at> ccss.com>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 43252 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43252: 27.1; DBus properties lack type hints or overrides
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 21:10:06 -0700
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Michael Albinus writes:

> Hugh Daschbach <hugh <at> ccss.com> writes:
>
> Hi Hugh,
>
> I've pushed a fix to master, which shall solve the 
> problem. Playing with
> introspection, I found the problem that it stalls if there are 
> no
> introspection data. Not applicable. So I've turned to the 
> alternative
> approach, allowing type symbols in `dbus-set-property' and
> `dbus-register-property'. You could call now
>
> (dbus-register-property :session "org.gnu.Emacs" "/node1"
>  "org.bluez.GattService1" "Device" :readwrite
>  :object-path "/path/node1")
>
> Similar in `dbus-set-property'. Documentation is adapted, 
> dbus-tests.el
> extended accordingly.

Thanks, Michael.  I think I still have issues.

The attached script generates two boolean properties, then issues 
a
GetManagedObjects method call.  The two properties are not 
returned,
though they are in the registered objects table.

The script also drops an elisp ‘dbus-get-all-managed-objects’ 
request in
the *scratch* buffer.  If I execute that, I get a similar failure 
to
#43251.  That may not be surprising.

I’m working an a more comprehensive test that registers the 
variety of
types I need to support.  I’ll post that when I have something 
worth
looking at.  I’d like to present that in a form compatible with
dbus-test.el rather than throw more one off scripts at you.  So 
give me
a bit.

I think the mechanism you implemented works well for simple types. 
Is
there a mechanism to specify the signature for an empty compound 
type?
I need arrays and dictionaries of various types.

For something like a byte array, I expect I’ll need to interleave 
the
:byte type between each value in the array.  Correct?

Thanks,
Hugh

[register-property-test.el (text/plain, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 229 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.