From unknown Tue Jun 24 13:54:17 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#43205 <43205@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#43205 <43205@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages Reply-To: bug#43205 <43205@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 20:54:17 +0000 retitle 43205 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages reassign 43205 emacs submitter 43205 Yuan Fu severity 43205 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 12:13:17 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 16:13:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEEKy-0008KN-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:13:17 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39294) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEEKx-0008KG-Hf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:13:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEEKx-0004Qw-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:13:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]:38171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEEKv-0004Ft-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:13:15 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id d20so6802544qka.5 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=d94N2ud4K9xA84bToS9fCDJrxFLLmJk4XjxlOn47h/s=; b=cvmpiRXPYt+K6YOLr74QGMqMAt6tjGjTy+/b6qxbgWzh+Sm/6WluT9POoYJnwr580l lcC5cVTK0jkqSGEy0+tBmPYJKzwxQswYoVKxafQ/2d6G+7VPZUSX6hGTvN1FBKfj22e+ 7pujh3o9M/PQtogMRHQmPflr5tUFEHp/ti+yhQMCKGobpTG6YnhMUs2ZspAixj1+KQpy nG49CjYlyABZrdgOiITAkO2mO21T3SxCRWSaWsWSFPFIcRBYAM0L80lqQsbJ4cuDbrIW zmDP8nIN7RNdRZGfywN9Br9cDVAe1NCzhOeZxApnI83HdRJCZdfAKjNuHfXFzW8neSgP 5gCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=d94N2ud4K9xA84bToS9fCDJrxFLLmJk4XjxlOn47h/s=; b=lGYRniRSae+sVjXCNbgWPhMcW50RrypZEo35tp+0QvUWjj1E942T8CKNqoHURWrl39 n6Gg2B4gHN+luNAV5HxKQZR+8cMG0nKBdZlAMBt6stc796mXBc0wIYKSQr6Vvm3ybviQ YveuwezMCBKCTjsjhGERuZJb2gUi+Qy27CqqQFFXzY7h8C4kzLcm+eBVTFzs2JtmR/Rv eM8Iw2Ztz9BF3uEU3K7YFQMNXQ0nu9pmEN2ffaLISMOyx7Bvl3Hv+tf0dHFn1/iQX6za A7+zIf7OIlzG74KlEcmLMekWG1TKibjrp+pRLJ7E4TegK+tYpQQrHyNNMld+oVz2hrpP USxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rYKukPYTph4KVZweA1/dZ+kqsSH1UkTqeEBgV0JktHim0XuQb 8hgamWk/iOBPkPhXca12mCm7irkfTWE9RzZj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxk4buKA15H0gYQ7oQAhgap9pejJs0MqptlGLdErnZ6gVvx0+pUhgE9kqYr0AEf3XTwtsRUAA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:952:: with SMTP id 79mr8600055qkj.57.1599235991656; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:98a:4200:9210:6153:d1ba:ebc1:880f? ([2601:98a:4200:9210:6153:d1ba:ebc1:880f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d47sm4939179qta.63.2020.09.04.09.13.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Yuan Fu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages Message-Id: Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:13:10 -0400 To: Bug Report Emacs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Currently the documentation of `eldoc-documentation-functions' says this: * `:thing', VALUE is a short string or symbol designating what is being reported on. The documentation display engine can elect to remove this information depending on space contraints; without saying what VALUE could be. For someone who want to write a frontend to display eldoc signitures, this is useless. For someone who want to write a documentation backend for eldoc, this is useless as well. I think the protocol should at least specify what VALUE could be expected: signature? full-doc? example? links? Also contraints is spelled wrong. And on line 705. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 14:32:51 2020 Received: (at 43205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 18:32:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEGW3-0005VV-Cb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com ([209.85.166.51]:33463) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEGW1-0005VH-8G for 43205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:32:49 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id g14so8154315iom.0 for <43205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oziOXqD6xHgXFAi04AFRljiZAveeG5CF0Tg7bwKo2Ek=; b=XdnOsPsak5qMQskEsu7uPUYlKOenMK9mXWiAGqjGXeATRyVExG6GrLn1lJ/dPBvSx9 4r38IN7qE9rnwPeMJ/FXBNsnxlQZYbS6WCWKaT9lBnYRFYUB3qeYL7g03N5DOuQrwelk odTCCP4SIhjiedfy/zHWV8WBv3YqfRicUzkAT+OuWZYm3/VmWMCVqdcYwye4kaMJhJWV o4mPU6hZbjy4HEmtftLTLkKk+d0xMnevYKjAZsrDA2/hl17bxHe/4gnLwUJsvbQSj8W7 TeJ16PFmfMYJDoY/xYY3WFxPXk4tMLSv7fzUdYwBdPgTlcEXtJv0gOBgNovpxF39Qzoc kWdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oziOXqD6xHgXFAi04AFRljiZAveeG5CF0Tg7bwKo2Ek=; b=kte7ym3McPC2+sZJ0aBXpnHmwlnQ69auq3A2IEu+ehrdf0ddYfiu4+SOkCz10Oh4K2 QjECykRHR5TYbSv1Xh82c8+e9weRTKR0GLMdqfCUWZwHOURZPXjb9QV2h+28aX30/fSh qwtILXaGeHZtDjVDXBjT064DOLsREs4+SLptfLjmZA2RsasDzfFnE+gyGn5QJVSbKcTd vxhnmYytQ06AVRywmuDhs6Ccd4on7wh+RjT2dbQoZ5DEZSEsxak1Qxku0IZkzTZnDcCq ZwkRorS2SiJpuyDwG79Ln78GaYt+XwqC6FupxDC6OeFKcoxFtuX2gqPlth59WwS06cZs lvSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/BFXNg9ttwPtbhCsKAwaXWMwsQoKkDRqxv8sSMSicQnXnmCsI /zjz57W/FGzg2gWHB4Y+0G6+WCca7iSgRUukJ6Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOcGXiLNVSycsJMorkGcEmw7CRWX6V3r9w3OAXFw+rRno3AwlWw8hMtnlEYAKY5LZbL/tLraA9PX9MPHjCcM4= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:968f:: with SMTP id m15mr8928625ion.156.1599244363566; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:32:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:32:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#43205: 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages To: Yuan Fu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033107c05ae81181a" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43205 Cc: 43205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000033107c05ae81181a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Acknowledged. The latest eldoc in master is a work in progress.This in on my to-do list. Soon I'll improve the documentation, as well as specifying what the "display engine" is supposed to be. I think, this will be quite useful when (re) designing your eldoc-box extension, Yuan. Maybe that extension could even be included into Emacs itself. Jo=C3=A3o On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 17:18 Yuan Fu wrote: > Currently the documentation of `eldoc-documentation-functions' says this: > > * `:thing', VALUE is a short string or symbol designating what is > being reported on. The documentation display engine can elect > to remove this information depending on space contraints; > > without saying what VALUE could be. For someone who want to write a > frontend to display eldoc signitures, this is useless. For someone who > want to write a documentation backend for eldoc, this is useless as > well. I think the protocol should at least specify what VALUE could be > expected: signature? full-doc? example? links? > > > > Also contraints is spelled wrong. And on line 705. > > > > --00000000000033107c05ae81181a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Acknowledged. The latest eldoc in master is a work in pro= gress.This in on my to-do list. Soon I'll improve the documentation, as= well as specifying what the "display engine" is supposed to be.<= div dir=3D"auto">
I think, this will be quite us= eful when (re) designing your eldoc-box extension, Yuan. Maybe that extensi= on could even be included into Emacs itself.

Jo=C3=A3o

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 17:18 Yuan Fu <= casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently the documentation of `eldoc-do= cumentation-functions' says this:

* `:thing', VALUE is a short string or symbol designating what is
being reported on.=C2=A0 The documentation display engine can elect
to remove this information depending on space contraints;

without saying what VALUE could be. For someone who want to write a
frontend to display eldoc signitures, this is useless. For someone who
want to write a documentation backend for eldoc, this is useless as
well. I think the protocol should at least specify what VALUE could be
expected: signature? full-doc? example? links?



Also contraints is spelled wrong. And on line 705.



--00000000000033107c05ae81181a-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 15:03:33 2020 Received: (at 43205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 19:03:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEGzk-0006D6-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:03:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:42448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEGzk-0006Cu-2V for 43205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:03:32 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 60so5448460qtc.9 for <43205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OX7zGZ7FMDhWiMIN+1GtBoW7v3mQMymaNdEj9lYkFtU=; b=Tg2qaJ8HPWWZrsjtO+Hd79bY8yeVCA0V+o0kN0MOb9qctyNwY6wdLaW25wIW/wzNw1 5n1u51Ei3WJmIuGuYQl6O6pTU/6xvM7jQlF5BxnI2Qj+jbqgRz2zYKHs3WxCtwqVZokX mH7UiNV78DeWBMqlX42Rp3gy1g2fLvjW1p3RlRo7Bo9yBpu079WbiCTXRH0PkwZdOdo1 X4h7vq7rGtV+uejT1z41dqts9+aSySEeE4T4vKe6ewp6RgZjnjE+ndsh9v41O1HUPwn/ SkFy46v7ckoyWpulPrIyK+EtniGysyvEQ3Cu8ANE/W7zpeuJ3dSp0EvurdVpsjaUA+JB jsCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OX7zGZ7FMDhWiMIN+1GtBoW7v3mQMymaNdEj9lYkFtU=; b=uEek7ZKljnQ6qHbE6rU9OgS0txQ0Ngx/wngiaF9Pju9C+cvv7IB4wAtpooiXhYv/nj XDyge1YUJ614JQ29VPKA/G9kTdUSp3QmAaScqJM0E/Mnoi6TtLOBkecIcFiB+KlWWnDQ C82aGFvzS2cG1cNp7+gp25E45Z+/pP+qk40/MZ6TNiL0I0ZghJsHseLYOKrg9eHhJTrc q+S31Vnyuc9FbmWVtqqq8dQ8MFX//lRALulcDstimQVbiI+npKsXVZwzA/WmnOrQgw5p PuWN9RYetlm+oScZAWD5S3GX56xuJ8SvKa3CB+8hGHtQQoaNNnuf9eHUe1mgEYw26xTX EXRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NfNPdRIUfQhGniKW34lNMU+SnpVOyjU7uK3MM5E7Vumjg/e8e 5WteW7ye607xAJ6feFhhyFA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRGJVekypk4YaUOtbjBIYUarsthU42S7dqaYHb504Ugvp5CqAx7dy9Vk3ZF0XcjUzdkpfPhA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:157:: with SMTP id f23mr10040498qtg.273.1599246206342; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:98a:4200:9210:41e1:9df6:99e1:3bb0? ([2601:98a:4200:9210:41e1:9df6:99e1:3bb0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b187sm5156322qkd.107.2020.09.04.12.03.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: bug#43205: 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages From: Yuan Fu In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:03:24 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <132B7054-2188-43F7-A174-EDFD653D21B1@gmail.com> References: To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43205 Cc: 43205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > On Sep 4, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora = wrote: >=20 > Acknowledged. The latest eldoc in master is a work in progress.This in = on my to-do list. Soon I'll improve the documentation, as well as = specifying what the "display engine" is supposed to be. >=20 > I think, this will be quite useful when (re) designing your eldoc-box = extension, Yuan. Maybe that extension could even be included into Emacs = itself. Indeed, I=E2=80=99m looking at the new eldoc to see if I can remove some = unnecessary complications introduced by the incompetence of the old = protocol. Thanks for working on this. Yuan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 12 08:32:04 2021 Received: (at 43205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2021 12:32:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2o0-0000Qi-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:32:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2ny-0000L2-E3 for 43205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:32:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aYlCcMfT45T0PrCJ1cS4qxQhGTYXh53YWv/cPuBhcUg=; b=Bt1MBi5Sx9XcNCJDcZn2x51OdR 7fp3ac/NzNSXkG6KBFW2lSPQMydyWgMnrHJ0O04z8bbq8DE4hW64toSnXJ/VzLotp64hD3s2myh5B rnI0/BzdAXbKn3TahyDXmXQLy6DrxZl3Ij4Gi+SEtIJA09Ho32p9yFIB6tEIcXZhCOCU=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2nq-0005ex-EO; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:31:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Yuan Fu Subject: Re: bug#43205: 28.0.50; Eldoc protocol not useful for third-party packages References: X-Now-Playing: Colored Music's _Individual Beauty_: "Ambient Discotheque" Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:31:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Yuan Fu's message of "Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:13:10 -0400") Message-ID: <87o8cb6z7q.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Yuan Fu writes: > Currently the documentation of `eldoc-documentation-functions' says this: > > * `:thing', VALUE is a short string or symbol designating what is > being reported on. The documentation display engine [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43205 Cc: 43205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Yuan Fu writes: > Currently the documentation of `eldoc-documentation-functions' says this: > > * `:thing', VALUE is a short string or symbol designating what is > being reported on. The documentation display engine can elect > to remove this information depending on space contraints; > > without saying what VALUE could be.=20 It looks like this was fixed in commit 4c543a724f2caff41d97a323bd4fffe3e86e8471 Author: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora AuthorDate: Sun Sep 6 15:37:02 2020 +0100 so I'm closing this bug report. If there's still improvements that should be made here, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 12 08:32:12 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2021 12:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2o8-0000Wu-E0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:32:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2o6-0000S1-OI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:32:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kG30SqxV6SyZu3LmMZ416IqDJRBU7pSQO+TWcR7Gcrs=; b=JmZakKu3iGj95j/OT796rsnykf nHLTbEkoljCsBoj4+bqFdlUxFnhgKAYG5SxX3QQobgGoP/O/7cwNULFSQKuk19NgrQG8I0hv3GAjS Qo4B3JjbL0e6T/OTUp2QL3mN3AsT7oT/hM3mYJ+rBH2u5zKLoOHGjSClO5OTwT77KzaA=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2nz-0005f9-Ba for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:32:05 +0200 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:32:02 +0200 Message-Id: <87mtrv6z7h.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43205 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 43205 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 43205 28.1 quit From unknown Tue Jun 24 13:54:17 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator