From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 02 16:17:06 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2020 20:17:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDZBq-0000AG-Ia for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:06 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDZBo-0000A8-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDZBo-00086j-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDZBo-0007xz-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:04 -0400 Received: from [2605:6000:1a0d:48fb::c5e] (port=59286 helo=lenovo-t430) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kDZBn-0007UM-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:17:03 -0400 From: Brett Gilio To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.1; ISO8601 & parse-time-string check in 27.1 Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: <874kogorvu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/org-webring When using the package I have authored above, there is a dependency on ISO-8601 for parsing ATOM time-strings in 27.1 or newer. The condition check for iso8601 in parse-time-string exists in 28.0.50 but is non-existent in 27.1 when ISO8601 was introduced. I am requesting that this condition check be backported to 27-next. Thanks, Brett Gilio From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 03 09:09:45 2020 Received: (at 43175) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2020 13:09:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33974 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDozp-0006zQ-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:09:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDozo-0006yl-2A for 43175@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:09:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDozi-0004g5-S5; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:09:38 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4547 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kDozi-0001IU-8h; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:09:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:09:27 +0300 Message-Id: <83mu27uhvc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Brett Gilio In-Reply-To: <874kogorvu.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Brett Gilio on Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:17:25 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#43175: 27.1; ISO8601 & parse-time-string check in 27.1 References: <874kogorvu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43175 Cc: 43175@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Brett Gilio > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:17:25 -0500 > > https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/org-webring > When using the package I have authored above, there is a dependency > on ISO-8601 for parsing ATOM time-strings in 27.1 or newer. The > condition check for iso8601 in parse-time-string exists in 28.0.50 > but is non-existent in 27.1 when ISO8601 was introduced. I am requesting > that this condition check be backported to 27-next. The change you mention implemented a new feature in parse-time-string, so I'd prefer not to backport it. Can you tell more about the reason for your request? I don't think I understand why the problem you have cannot be resolved for Emacs 27 by using iso8601.el functions from your package. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 01:37:46 2020 Received: (at 43175) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2020 06:37:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjS-0005zE-M1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 01:37:46 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjQ-0005yz-Ta for 43175@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 01:37:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/FANj3kPhtYgOjZteLQtZ8nl30YqvZwVOkswfy34zkE=; b=f5lUrQJT+WVPytUTW/I2oNz7Df h4V2UU0rqioBSeiJsUu46pbLBhN+QGHLQmt8d5gDTbawckRcwiFeTIf6WPOh3m7zzNBF4ocS3gw/u f+rtuebrVe1IXJJklWQ0eEHmT/PoB2Ywz9mxlOKUYktRSPdB6oPqnxhImWnOFIrWkTXY=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjI-0007Tk-2D; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 07:37:38 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#43175: 27.1; ISO8601 & parse-time-string check in 27.1 References: <874kogorvu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu27uhvc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Lal & Mike Waterson's _Bright Phoebus_: "Never the same" Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 07:37:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mu27uhvc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:09:27 +0300") Message-ID: <87sg7ufl1t.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Can you tell more about the reason for your request? I don't think I > understand why the problem you have cannot be resolved for Emacs 27 by > using iso8601.el functions from your package. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43175 Cc: 43175@debbugs.gnu.org, Brett Gilio X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Can you tell more about the reason for your request? I don't think I > understand why the problem you have cannot be resolved for Emacs 27 by > using iso8601.el functions from your package. More information was requested, but no response was given within a few months, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 25 01:37:51 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2020 06:37:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjW-0005zX-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 01:37:51 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjV-0005z6-NN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 01:37:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A60xZfzUkOmzGH2FxPfwqlEq1ojzrvfPFfRo1aYDAsc=; b=ltfK5o97HI8sYdtzVHGh84TFVU 4+K5SvkUR6/xq0fYjpgiouZpzvv8FPzKPytic8kPXFbDJaigl7jAxYXP4lsnk1HSxmVfjDPT/zzjp A018r+V2dVllJ5fuoO4Lmi7CYh9ej3/Qy3cs2ux74B2ADpHO9K459YOGmpOD/bd0r/m8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ksgjO-0007Tq-DU for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 07:37:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 07:37:41 +0100 Message-Id: <87r1nefl1m.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #43175 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 43175 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 43175 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:19:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator