GNU bug report logs - #43103
28.0.50; Default ElDoc composition strategy in Elisp mode (eldoc-documentation-strategy)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: 43103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#43103: 28.0.50; Default ElDoc composition strategy in Elisp mode (eldoc-documentation-strategy)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 22:12:09 +0100

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:

> On 31.08.2020 23:25, João Távora wrote:
>
>>>>> These is definite wisdom in that.
>>>> I see only signs of rudimentary intial design which predates
>>>> eldoc-...-multiline-p, composition, Flymake...
>>> That doesn't mean the initial design didn't get something right.
>>> If it didn't, this aspect would have likely changed by now.
>> It couldn't change because there weren't the tools for it to change.
>> There are now.
>
> I don't think so. It still uses the echo area.

The echo area is not one of the new tools.

>>> Having a major mode exhibit a different behavior WRT eldoc strategy is
>>> bound to be confusing. E.g., why Elisp and not Python? Why not the
>>> rest?
>> I think people are used to their major modes working in a certain
>> way,
>> and changes to that way should come about incrementally.
>
> Many of us here program in multiple programming languages.
>
> Having major modes exhibit different behaviors where they don't have
> to is jarring.

Shall I enumerate variables that are set differently per major-mode?
Your argument is very odd: every major mode has different behaviours,
including for example the shape and form of the elements of
eldoc-documentation-functions.

> They don't have multiple documentation sources? One from major mode,
> another from Flymake, at least.

But you don't know in general the form of each of those, or if there may
be more, or other characteristics.

>>>>>> - even if eldoc-echo-area-use-multiline-p is set to nil, users can still
>>>>>> get to all the info collecte by ElDoc with the new
>>>>>> `eldoc-documentation-compose` strategy by pressing M-x eldoc-doc-buffer
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that the only benefit?
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Any others?
>> For example, it can be used to have ElDoc information permanently
>> visible in another frame.
>
> In the default configuration?

Yes.

> You're proposing to change the default configuration.
>
> To clarify, I was asking whether this was the only benefit of changing
> the strategy if we also set eldoc-echo-area-use-multiline-p to nil.

Hopefully you understand now.  I've told you all I know.

> One particular way it's unfortunate, is I actually *would* like a
> generic "show documentation" feature with an existing key
> binding. Shame it doesn't really work for that purpose.

Try M-x eldoc and global-set-key and tell us what's missing. I don't
know how this relates to the ElDoc buffer or its purported "weirdness".

João

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.