From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43102: [PATCH] Fix trace-calls-to-procedure Resent-From: Robin Green Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 43102 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 43102@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Robin Green X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15987118284832 (code B ref -1); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:38:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2020 14:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yd-0001Fs-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yY-0001Fg-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yY-0002J7-CY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from [67.214.175.87] (port=41797 helo=vpn.dnsexit.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yW-00008l-Ty for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from mail.dnsexit.com (box2 [67.214.175.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vpn.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD16F6084F for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6721A3C0CA7 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dnsexit.com Received: from mail.dnsexit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (box2.dnsexit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2Eh91vxgV08; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (greenrd.plus.com [212.159.116.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C34A3C0F6A; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Robin Green Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 15:26:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20200829142604.20520-1-greenrd@greenrd.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 67.214.175.87 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=67.214.175.87; envelope-from=greenrd@greenrd.org; helo=vpn.dnsexit.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/29 10:27:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 40 X-Spam_score: 4.0 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam_report: (4.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-t [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [67.214.175.87 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-t [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [67.214.175.87 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-to-procedure (max-indent (- width 40))) (define (apply-handler frame depth) (print-application frame depth width prefix max-indent)) - (define (return-handler frame depth values) + (define (return-handler frame depth) (print-return frame depth width prefix max-indent)) (trap-calls-to-procedure proc apply-handler return-handler)) -- 2.27.0 From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43102: what is this about ? References: <20200829142604.20520-1-greenrd@greenrd.org> In-Reply-To: <20200829142604.20520-1-greenrd@greenrd.org> Resent-From: Adriano Peluso Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43102 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 43102@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Received: via spool by 43102-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43102.162118129113482 (code B ref 43102); Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 43102) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 16:08:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liJJL-0003VN-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:57904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAdt-0007iF-MZ for 43102@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:52:50 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjXyM453VzDrWm for <43102@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 23:52:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1621147963; bh=bTwPy2G9Sj+YHd7J/9hoVsIKTuQjJw6mXkqtCeVu/zk=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=aw9CuiBKxaSlpQBEBwiBQfFrC+nrCqoZyaXln1kk8S1JBitJeu+Mj4oNsMn0OAHEA GAzOrRIoyN/msWomGyJ44i4IHqxixDAmBm6pYFFroEw2hnXyriV+PPepYr5pjU6I0A 13Io96u7IvkjLKf5aMIsznlFXACVGbL90/eteIv4= X-Riseup-User-ID: 25A30E32ACCA85DC8AEF3A480D074D8C292B358D0C2869604E0974D9DDA04ED8 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FjXyL5G3fz1yj4 for <43102@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 23:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <175945b2643ae1904b97f614395d67224f45fda5.camel@riseup.net> From: Adriano Peluso Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 08:52:38 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi would you give a bit of context ? What error is this patch supposed to fix ? Has this anything to do with #48412 ? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2021-05/msg00033.html Thanks From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43102: what is this about ? Resent-From: Adriano Peluso Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43102 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 43102@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Received: via spool by 43102-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43102.162118129213496 (code B ref 43102); Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 43102) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 16:08:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liJJL-0003VX-N1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:59532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liBJd-0000Ho-TD for 43102@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 03:35:58 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjYw808lCzDqBW for <43102@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:35:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1621150552; bh=zXAboWxaBu7l/MfmRbxF0akJ/+58b4OBowpbE3qffoM=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FuCUM9JrRp3lBBI9RzBVX/MgIn2kHq3dN6ekjMdaRbcTqQhv9sutNLSJwqIcVNi0L 9S/mnxwvdAqtHs0BtGZ7LtDj13TF2WACzSI69oHJ9Yy+LCsPgG+HXCh4ecdI1NV6Hc MBm96YiGIFyHD0Pt7/6A+XgoRGyOdzrACrn5uRrE= X-Riseup-User-ID: DFC18B8F54D537483360B53D736F091D32F61FC1965EBB86A4312F496C6C0A97 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FjYw71cJGz1yjy for <43102@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7199fba56e8613a330c789c4912b23f4069f5f7f.camel@riseup.net> From: Adriano Peluso Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 09:35:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <175945b2643ae1904b97f614395d67224f45fda5.camel@riseup.net> References: <175945b2643ae1904b97f614395d67224f45fda5.camel@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Il giorno dom, 16/05/2021 alle 08.52 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: > Hi > > would you give a bit of context ? > > What error is this patch supposed to fix ? > > Has this anything to do with #48412 ? > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2021-05/msg00033.html > > Thanks well, I tried your patch and it does fix tracepointing Thanks ! From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:58:15 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Robin Green Subject: bug#43102: closed (Re: bug#48412: duplicate ?) Message-ID: References: <20200829142604.20520-1-greenrd@greenrd.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 43102 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 43102@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:34:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1621452841-19359-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1621452841-19359-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #43102: [PATCH] Fix trace-calls-to-procedure which was filed against the guile package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 43102@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 43102: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D43102 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1621452841-19359-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 43102-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2021 19:33:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx3-00051n-GF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:53 -0400 Received: from mta-14-4.privateemail.com ([198.54.118.206]:18393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx0-00051V-De; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:52 -0400 Received: from mta-14.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E9180061; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (unknown [10.20.151.207]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 165E68005F; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: bug#48412: duplicate ? From: lloda In-Reply-To: <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:34:26 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> To: randomlooser@riseup.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43102-done Cc: 43102-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 48412-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Patch applied in f9f55b9ce74898d1b0a77dcc9b4aa260e5cd208d. Thanks! > On 16 May 2021, at 09:09, Adriano Peluso wrote: > > Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: >> I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here >> >> It's in #43102 >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 > > I applied this patch > > It does solve the issue, it seems > > Now I can tracepoint my procedure > > > > ------------=_1621452841-19359-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2020 14:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yd-0001Fs-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yY-0001Fg-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yY-0002J7-CY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from [67.214.175.87] (port=41797 helo=vpn.dnsexit.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC1yW-00008l-Ty for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from mail.dnsexit.com (box2 [67.214.175.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vpn.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD16F6084F for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6721A3C0CA7 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dnsexit.com Received: from mail.dnsexit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (box2.dnsexit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2Eh91vxgV08; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (greenrd.plus.com [212.159.116.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dnsexit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C34A3C0F6A; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:27:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Robin Green To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Fix trace-calls-to-procedure Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 15:26:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20200829142604.20520-1-greenrd@greenrd.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 67.214.175.87 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=67.214.175.87; envelope-from=greenrd@greenrd.org; helo=vpn.dnsexit.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/29 10:27:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 40 X-Spam_score: 4.0 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam_report: (4.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-t [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [67.214.175.87 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Robin Green X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-t [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [67.214.175.87 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * module/system/vm/trace.scm: Remove argument --- module/system/vm/trace.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/system/vm/trace.scm b/module/system/vm/trace.scm index e9f17dae8..54840d8fd 100644 --- a/module/system/vm/trace.scm +++ b/module/system/vm/trace.scm @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ trace-calls-to-procedure (max-indent (- width 40))) (define (apply-handler frame depth) (print-application frame depth width prefix max-indent)) - (define (return-handler frame depth values) + (define (return-handler frame depth) (print-return frame depth width prefix max-indent)) (trap-calls-to-procedure proc apply-handler return-handler)) -- 2.27.0 ------------=_1621452841-19359-1--