GNU bug report logs - #42981
void function next-error-found

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Subject: bug#42981: closed (Re: bug#42981: void function next-error-found)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:58:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#42981: void function next-error-found

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 42981 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
42981: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42981
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>, 42981-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42981: void function next-error-found
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:57:36 +0300

On 26.08.2020 21:40, Juri Linkov wrote:
> or just use (setq next-error-last-buffer (or from-buffer (current-buffer)))

Done that now, thanks.

This should work now (xref 1.0.3 should be built soon), but Philip, 
please let us know if something is still amiss.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: void function next-error-found
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:12:26 +0200

Hi,

I'm using Emacs 26.3 again, and while testing project-search, I noticed
that an error is signalled by Xref (1.0.2) use of the function
next-error-found, that hasn't been defined as of 26.3. As Xref promises
compatibility with 26.3, it seems that next-error-found should be
replaced with something more backwards compatible.

-- 
	Philip K.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.