GNU bug report logs - #42981
void function next-error-found

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#42981: closed (void function next-error-found)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:58:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:57:36 +0300
with message-id <68d60166-2219-4515-f51f-4859fc46d2a7 <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#42981: void function next-error-found
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #42981,
regarding void function next-error-found
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
42981: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42981
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: void function next-error-found
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:12:26 +0200
Hi,

I'm using Emacs 26.3 again, and while testing project-search, I noticed
that an error is signalled by Xref (1.0.2) use of the function
next-error-found, that hasn't been defined as of 26.3. As Xref promises
compatibility with 26.3, it seems that next-error-found should be
replaced with something more backwards compatible.

-- 
	Philip K.


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: "Philip K." <philipk <at> posteo.net>, 42981-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42981: void function next-error-found
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:57:36 +0300
On 26.08.2020 21:40, Juri Linkov wrote:
> or just use (setq next-error-last-buffer (or from-buffer (current-buffer)))

Done that now, thanks.

This should work now (xref 1.0.3 should be built soon), but Philip, 
please let us know if something is still amiss.


This bug report was last modified 4 years and 270 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.