GNU bug report logs - #42736
[PATCH] gnu: emacs-doom-themes: Update to 2.1.6-5.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>

Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 03:19:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 42736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> gnu.org>
To: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Cc: 42736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#42736] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-doom-themes: Update to 2.1.6-5.
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:37:11 -0500
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us> writes:

> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-doom-themes): Update to 2.1.6-5. This
> commit revision add support for Emacs 27.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> index f857b594eb..7dc8e42f81 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> @@ -22053,8 +22053,8 @@ contrast and few colors.")
>        (license license:gpl3+))))
>  
>  (define-public emacs-doom-themes
> -  (let ((commit "54039c5171e3f8c9cef1f82122549b66cd8c8f7b")
> -        (revision "4")
> +  (let ((commit "e803fc4ac8cf7118e2d1544d8241b848b5e79e9f")
> +        (revision "5")
>          (version "2.1.6"))
>      (package
>        (name "emacs-doom-themes")
> @@ -22066,7 +22066,7 @@ contrast and few colors.")
>                        (commit commit)))
>                  (file-name (git-file-name name version))
>                  (sha256
> -                 (base32 "1iwdjq4q2gkhi6jwas3ywgmdz5dg14sfb3fzhqd7wih6j3i2l3cr"))))
> +                 (base32 "128hdmf0jkzr12fv2r6z349qiwba6q97hsb6b1n2qlhi0v5v3mfh"))))
>        (build-system emacs-build-system)
>        (native-inputs
>         `(("emacs-ert-runner" ,emacs-ert-runner)))

Hey Jack,

Thanks for taking time to revise this package. When I originally wrote
it I made notice to the fact that some elisp bytecompilations were
failing or not behaving appropriately. Since then I am pretty sure
hlissner has disabled the bytecompilation completely? Could you review
this for me, and if true please revise the appropriate arguments. If you
aren't sure what I am talking about, please let me know.

Thanks,
Brett Gilio




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 290 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.