GNU bug report logs - #42704
Documentation of call-process

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 42704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gregory Heytings <ghe <at> sdf.org>
To: 42704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#42704: Documentation of call-process
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:47:55 +0200 (CEST)

>
>> The documentation of 'call-process' doe not make reference to the 
>> variable 'exec-path'.  It should.
>
> The ELisp manual says that, see the node "Subprocess Creation".  This 
> isn't specific to call-process, that variable is used by all the 
> functions that create subprocesses.
>

Indeed.  I still believe that adding the sentence "If PROGRAM is not an 
absolute file name, the variable exec-path contains a list of directories 
to search." in the docstring of call-process (and a similar sentence in 
the docstrings of make-process and call-process-region) would be useful.

>
>> Using '(setenv "PATH" "...")' does not have the expected effect for 
>> 'call-process'.  The environment variable "PATH" is correctly updated, 
>> the variable 'process-environment' is also updated, but what 
>> 'call-process' actually uses to locate the executable is the variable 
>> 'exec-path'.
>
> The changes to the environment variables only affect the environment 
> passed to subprocesses, they don't affect the environment of the Emacs 
> process itself.
>

Indeed.  Creating a subprocess is in between the two (Emacs and the 
subprocess), and I at least would have expected that setting "PATH" would 
have changed the path in which the program executable is searched.

Gregory

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.