GNU bug report logs -
#42604
Manual section on building Guix from Git is incomplete
Previous Next
Reported by: Tirifto <tirifto <at> posteo.cz>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:34:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#42604: Manual section on building Guix from Git is incomplete
which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 42604 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
42604: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42604
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 11:44, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 15:03, Tirifto <tirifto <at> posteo.cz> wrote:
>
>> The manual describes how to fetch Guix from Git in section ‘14.1
>> Building from Git’, including how to verify the authenticity of the
>> copy. Quoting the part in question:
>>
>>> If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest
>>> version from the Git repository:
>>>
>>> git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>>>
>>> How do you ensure that you obtained a genuine copy of the
>>> repository? To do that, run ‘guix git authenticate’, passing if the
>>> commit and OpenPGP fingerprint of the “channel introduction” (*note
>>> Invoking guix git authenticate::):
>>>
>>> guix git authenticate 9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddccfea34bad \
>>> "BBB0 2DDF 2CEA F6A8 0D1D E643 A2A0 6DF2 A33A 54FA"
>>>
>>> This command completes with exit code zero on success; it prints an
>>> error message and exits with a non-zero code otherwise.
>>
>> I have encountered two problems here:
>>
>> 1.‘guix git authenticate’ only works after the branch ‘keyring’ has
>> been set up locally; I’ve been told to achieve this with the
>> command ‘git fetch upstream keyring:keyring’, but ‘git checkout
>> keyring’ has worked for me, too. After that, it seems to be
>> necessary to switch back to the master branch to successfully run
>> ‘guix git authenticate’. I think the commands for this should be
>> included in this section.
>>
>> 2. The word ‘if’ seems to be a typo of ‘it’. I first thought that the
>> sentence was incomplete and that the command should pass if the
>> commit and the fingerprint [did something]. :)
>>
>> Not sure how the first one would be solved the best.
>
> I think the latest [1] version of the manual fixes the 2 issue. WDYT?
>
> 1: <http://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Building-from-Git>
I am closing. If I miss something, feel free to reopen.
All the best,
simon
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello!
The manual describes how to fetch Guix from Git in section ‘14.1
Building from Git’, including how to verify the authenticity of the
copy. Quoting the part in question:
> If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest
> version from the Git repository:
>
> git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>
> How do you ensure that you obtained a genuine copy of the
> repository? To do that, run ‘guix git authenticate’, passing if the
> commit and OpenPGP fingerprint of the “channel introduction” (*note
> Invoking guix git authenticate::):
>
> guix git authenticate 9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddccfea34bad \
> "BBB0 2DDF 2CEA F6A8 0D1D E643 A2A0 6DF2 A33A 54FA"
>
> This command completes with exit code zero on success; it prints an
> error message and exits with a non-zero code otherwise.
I have encountered two problems here:
1.‘guix git authenticate’ only works after the branch ‘keyring’ has
been set up locally; I’ve been told to achieve this with the
command ‘git fetch upstream keyring:keyring’, but ‘git checkout
keyring’ has worked for me, too. After that, it seems to be
necessary to switch back to the master branch to successfully run
‘guix git authenticate’. I think the commands for this should be
included in this section.
2. The word ‘if’ seems to be a typo of ‘it’. I first thought that the
sentence was incomplete and that the command should pass if the
commit and the fingerprint [did something]. :)
Not sure how the first one would be solved the best.
Best of wishes
// Tirifto
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 277 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.