From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:00 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#42499 <42499@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#42499 <42499@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace Reply-To: bug#42499 <42499@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:03:00 +0000 retitle 42499 [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace reassign 42499 emacs submitter 42499 Zach Shaftel severity 42499 normal tag 42499 moreinfo patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 23 19:30:13 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2020 23:30:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jykf0-0003YP-3T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:30:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jykev-0003YE-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jykev-0003ES-KQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]:37688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyket-0000cT-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:53 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id d27so5728993qtg.4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:29:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=K/5X9Y0MkGonFxfpDOYPO+1IjT7XyMuLDmcoX1TjI9A=; b=POKEUg7fXSXvdLv4o8pKnDKHPLAmg8cod2D4iQXxhAo9ShtJS4k8FCBMtXkN6m3iQB UC6+pg4fp6bRXO28Z33oNUA3nOBM68Vi/12OvFeWp8tuU25d480BR2o66voxNg1rD011 wEFUqCDNroo0u5pYEV1lLrxuGr/nYA4/63JU98WjVfOX6GjZKbYLvJ7RbJTecyg5vRb8 O6XVTWpwuDp/1Xih8y8RSlzXxvm5j6SyQZnmVG7Xe0BBjd5+I9vu0SxxU7u02z7B3E5D 0HjNr8lVFDhHj0OQwhNENFzhfpQk3mjrSlrBdzvUfvJj7tIbDGjC8uWzgnVEo+Fz0MaP CRug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version; bh=K/5X9Y0MkGonFxfpDOYPO+1IjT7XyMuLDmcoX1TjI9A=; b=gllIJ8BDGVxhqpXxqvKcyzRfuxdmI1lbgv3pxMSBgqKfwRhzjOyVa/CIr1DtCFcZvc 5X8APgz4Ve5TXIU4zpZ+XAaldL7cW1qNGxn2RHgqRGiJ+r12jFc4fUOk3waWkB7ffpgQ ZmTFKcY36Oxk10c2pQ1esRoARALOF5Us1VHjGKPWHL8k17Q3YFhKCxKxdZd4SgWn1u1j h8CS48cfD9c0vtzf4+QiQKXTO4El4BEokrMdJIHXAXqXoWUZB97RjI1iKjBfG+pXGPHV lWwHd8h9FaqZxEsQZrkJ6ny5i/mIAUYniel5Y03VMELylJ/3chUsvbovscjg3b6S6nYP B6XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fv0lQSpGMpb8Q0X/gx7tbdH1MOcFSsepAuyM4kM64kPWt7NVI e/+7ur31yxenORoXqxjOMvnEeUiffNc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9EjV1PHoQWLVTleyMgbHBqdN1IoBAFL7ZwDhvG22s6ng81exsYv8aoLxJ4t7rxtvpo+7dhA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5181:: with SMTP id c1mr6921661qtn.173.1595546989936; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arch-thinkpad ([2604:2000:2f41:2d00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 84sm4513727qkf.136.2020.07.23.16.29.49 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:29:49 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 28.0.50 From: Zach Shaftel To: Subject: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace Message-ID: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d; envelope-from=zshaftel@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x82d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain This patch adds the offset in a bytecode function's execution where an error occurs to the *Backtrace* buffer, like this: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp t) string-match(t t nil) 13 test-condition-case() load("/home/zach/.repos/bench-compare.el/test/test-debug...") 78 byte-recompile-file("/home/zach/.repos/bench-compare.el/test/test-debug..." nil 0 t) 35 emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load() funcall-interactively(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load) call-interactively(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load record nil) 101 command-execute(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load record) If you disassemble one of the annotated functions, you can find the instruction where the error occured. A 'bytecode_offset' field is added to the 'specbinding.bt' struct, which holds the offset in the execution of that frame's bytecode function. The offset for the function being executed is stored in a field of the 'thread_state' struct, and updated from within 'exec_byte_code' before a funcall. Then 'record_in_backtrace', called by Ffuncall, finds the last frame and stores the offset there. The frame's offset is added to the FLAGS plist argument passed by 'mapbacktrace'. See further discussion about the limitations of the attached implementation here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-07/msg00365.html My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. The patch attached is a simple diff without commit messages. I can add NEWS and Changelog entries/commit messages if this ends up going through, but I may not be able to get to that until next week. -Zach --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bytecode-offset-in-backtrace.patch diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/backtrace.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/backtrace.el index 37dad8db16..f67e1dd72a 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/backtrace.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/backtrace.el @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ backtrace-mode-map map) "Local keymap for `backtrace-mode' buffers.") -(defconst backtrace--flags-width 2 +(defconst backtrace--flags-width 7 "Width in characters of the flags for a backtrace frame.") ;;; Navigation and Text Properties @@ -746,11 +746,16 @@ backtrace--print-flags "Print the flags of a backtrace FRAME if enabled in VIEW." (let ((beg (point)) (flag (plist-get (backtrace-frame-flags frame) :debug-on-exit)) - (source (plist-get (backtrace-frame-flags frame) :source-available))) + (source (plist-get (backtrace-frame-flags frame) :source-available)) + (offset (plist-get (backtrace-frame-flags frame) :bytecode-offset)) + ;; right justify and pad the offset (or the empty string) + (offset-format (format "%%%ds " (- backtrace--flags-width 3))) + (fun (ignore-errors (indirect-function (backtrace-frame-fun frame))))) (when (plist-get view :show-flags) - (when source (insert ">")) - (when flag (insert "*"))) - (insert (make-string (- backtrace--flags-width (- (point) beg)) ?\s)) + (insert (if source ">" " ")) + (insert (if flag "*" " ")) + (insert (format offset-format + (or (and (byte-code-function-p fun) offset) "")))) (put-text-property beg (point) 'backtrace-section 'func))) (defun backtrace--print-func-and-args (frame _view) diff --git a/src/bytecode.c b/src/bytecode.c index 5ac30aa101..c6766a38cf 100644 --- a/src/bytecode.c +++ b/src/bytecode.c @@ -311,6 +311,10 @@ #define DISCARD(n) (top -= (n)) #define TOP (*top) +/* Update the thread's bytecode offset, just before NEXT. */ + +#define UPDATE_OFFSET (backtrace_byte_offset = pc - bytestr_data - 1) + DEFUN ("byte-code", Fbyte_code, Sbyte_code, 3, 3, 0, doc: /* Function used internally in byte-compiled code. The first argument, BYTESTR, is a string of byte code; @@ -618,6 +622,7 @@ #define DEFINE(name, value) LABEL (name) , op -= Bcall; docall: { + UPDATE_OFFSET; DISCARD (op); #ifdef BYTE_CODE_METER if (byte_metering_on && SYMBOLP (TOP)) @@ -1448,7 +1453,7 @@ #define DEFINE(name, value) LABEL (name) , unbind_to (count, Qnil); error ("binding stack not balanced (serious byte compiler bug)"); } - + backtrace_byte_offset = -1; Lisp_Object result = TOP; SAFE_FREE (); return result; diff --git a/src/eval.c b/src/eval.c index 959adea646..e4451aa96c 100644 --- a/src/eval.c +++ b/src/eval.c @@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ backtrace_args (union specbinding *pdl) return pdl->bt.args; } +static int +backtrace_bytecode_offset (union specbinding *pdl) +{ + eassert (pdl->kind == SPECPDL_BACKTRACE); + return pdl->bt.bytecode_offset; +} + static bool backtrace_debug_on_exit (union specbinding *pdl) { @@ -2149,6 +2156,11 @@ record_in_backtrace (Lisp_Object function, Lisp_Object *args, ptrdiff_t nargs) specpdl_ptr->bt.function = function; current_thread->stack_top = specpdl_ptr->bt.args = args; specpdl_ptr->bt.nargs = nargs; + if (backtrace_byte_offset > 0) { + union specbinding *nxt = backtrace_top (); + if (backtrace_p (nxt) && nxt->kind == SPECPDL_BACKTRACE) + nxt->bt.bytecode_offset = backtrace_byte_offset; + } grow_specpdl (); return count; @@ -3650,6 +3662,10 @@ backtrace_frame_apply (Lisp_Object function, union specbinding *pdl) if (backtrace_debug_on_exit (pdl)) flags = list2 (QCdebug_on_exit, Qt); + int off = backtrace_bytecode_offset (pdl); + if (off > 0) + flags = Fcons (QCbytecode_offset, Fcons (make_fixnum (off), flags)); + if (backtrace_nargs (pdl) == UNEVALLED) return call4 (function, Qnil, backtrace_function (pdl), *backtrace_args (pdl), flags); else @@ -4237,6 +4253,7 @@ syms_of_eval (void) defsubr (&Sfetch_bytecode); defsubr (&Sbacktrace_debug); DEFSYM (QCdebug_on_exit, ":debug-on-exit"); + DEFSYM (QCbytecode_offset, ":bytecode-offset"); defsubr (&Smapbacktrace); defsubr (&Sbacktrace_frame_internal); defsubr (&Sbacktrace_frames_from_thread); diff --git a/src/lisp.h b/src/lisp.h index 3442699088..e92300f4f7 100644 --- a/src/lisp.h +++ b/src/lisp.h @@ -3230,6 +3230,7 @@ #define DEFVAR_KBOARD(lname, vname, doc) \ Lisp_Object function; Lisp_Object *args; ptrdiff_t nargs; + int bytecode_offset; } bt; }; diff --git a/src/thread.h b/src/thread.h index a09929fa44..b5e3f0f9c5 100644 --- a/src/thread.h +++ b/src/thread.h @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ #define specpdl (current_thread->m_specpdl) union specbinding *m_specpdl_ptr; #define specpdl_ptr (current_thread->m_specpdl_ptr) + /* The offset of the current op of the byte-code function being + executed. */ + int m_backtrace_byte_offset; +#define backtrace_byte_offset (current_thread->m_backtrace_byte_offset) + /* Depth in Lisp evaluations and function calls. */ intmax_t m_lisp_eval_depth; #define lisp_eval_depth (current_thread->m_lisp_eval_depth) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 17 05:08:41 2020 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2020 09:08:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTiCe-0005ZH-OZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:08:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTiCd-0005Z4-FD for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:08:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=z493cokkFUVvnLW50M8XP9VSZlZpG92ObAPNjExuxYM=; b=erqQn/VnrVRSDcjrmYNBXj6biz NhHesMb1tdvXT6Mx+z61v6Ybe007cIycwSSzSeKLy6aKfUol9Jf5f99vCQVo56Avm4gKKqxiW8K5d xNviKf1Nzn/iPREacsV3fABuuV4gHRTAH5+Jd0xbYwZLPkbGxgEWptiguEdOhRDv5KTU=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kTiCV-0001kf-6T; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:08:33 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Zach Shaftel Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Machinedrum's _Vapor City Citizenship Programme_: "SeeSea VIP" Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:08:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> (Zach Shaftel's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:48 -0400") Message-ID: <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Zach Shaftel writes: > This patch adds the offset in a bytecode function's execution where an > error occurs to the *Backtrace* buffer, like this: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp t) > string [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Zach Shaftel writes: > This patch adds the offset in a bytecode function's execution where an > error occurs to the *Backtrace* buffer, like this: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp t) > string-match(t t nil) > 13 test-condition-case() > load("/home/zach/.repos/bench-compare.el/test/test-debug...") > 78 byte-recompile-file("/home/zach/.repos/bench-compare.el/test/test-debug..." nil 0 t) > 35 emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load() > funcall-interactively(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load) > call-interactively(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load record nil) > 101 command-execute(emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load record) > > If you disassemble one of the annotated functions, you can find the > instruction where the error occured. Sounds useful, but probably somewhat less so since Emacs is moving to natively compiling Elisp in Emacs 28. Does anybody else have an opinion here? > My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be > merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. This was in July, and I can't see your name in the copyright assingment file. Did the assignment process stall? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 17 05:32:50 2020 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2020 09:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33336 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTia2-0008IR-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:32:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTia0-0008I7-Q9 for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:32:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTiZv-0007Mr-GG; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:32:43 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kTiZu-0003Gt-QM; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:32:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:32:43 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:08:29 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:08:29 +0200 > Cc: 42499@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If you disassemble one of the annotated functions, you can find the > > instruction where the error occured. > > Sounds useful, but probably somewhat less so since Emacs is moving to > natively compiling Elisp in Emacs 28. Does anybody else have an opinion > here? I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, or may be unable to do so because of the GCC version they have installed. We should continue supporting byte-compilation features for the next few versions at least. > > My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be > > merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. > > This was in July, and I can't see your name in the copyright assingment > file. Did the assignment process stall? I have an email from Craig in late August saying the disclaimer is being submitted to legal. Suggest to ping Craig about this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 18 00:15:53 2020 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 04:15:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU06r-0006aU-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 00:15:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU06o-0006aH-VS for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 00:15:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kU06j-0000vt-Mq; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 00:15:45 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kU06g-0000ye-4o; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 00:15:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:32:43 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 00:15:42 -0400 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just > because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might > legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, or > may be unable to do so because of the GCC version they have > installed. We should continue supporting byte-compilation features > for the next few versions at least. We should continue supporting byte compilation indefinitely. My machine is slower than what you are accustomed to, and I think that native compilation could be a big slowdown. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 18 04:11:46 2020 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 08:11:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU3n7-0006B7-Vw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:11:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kU3n5-0006At-Rr for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 04:11:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iONHBQSKz9kebzhvSic2dWu3d4v42HYxOrboiTLGGes=; b=UpQuAXwukkvnlVKKFhdN+BIku+ G3cwDLhh+ayrs9bfbMYAWgTbcBg2hhc/YhNU+zP2DpElS+ovMA5pmGvT8sD5MokaXtJblw81skgAF hFkUHtIR3naegNMyHGQutrxZvjdam3ZnxBfJ5S0gvyvWoIcmlaGCxH9Q94bMqVu7IJXM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kU3mw-0006Hw-KN; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:38 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEVDNUhYT2KHdIYf GCT0zK+oXWX////KAn60AAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+QKEgciIGgyBOwAAAG7SURBVDjL XZRBcsMgDEWlquzBHvY2SfakTA/Qjr13Oub+V6mEwNAyWWT0pP9BCAMAoHV1TZQSB6z8Iv+BC9yS LECnoFVMISRdkg14FTgXbqmhCBYHsAzAdXMX1g6InTq4UwMp4VhxXzqA0eP+TQ1E7CCE+zZ386sk CLhdQCuwgu/5OmIBVk4Z2GNu5qjnsKI3jQcEBQQqlkYgyaCdWUZQmkjFy7awycXcWqBS0uJ+24oU WydJqDuKHFeA5V7AaTfAnwr6BZd05/N2ASpAlPBV8qsUJQHISv5lNN5AqWPXPNd4ATMUQNHl/Lnl LkUVPH0+TB6kSDdFbz4TXlLcQQUoIJpt8KCyW5yRwXsHFitIi8/QAceoaGGyJhszANSOTOTM8e4H DwbiFGg1x3mMB+Qbj8iPZkV77gOQKREaA1q//QM8IPNHsHB5XyC4eXossfV2yxVMqyOew96RrHfq pgViCKuFP8AKwGd4vJz1/yr4UcXw+Fmduu/b0QDPFLKWU5PcgeMR4We+Kjh3HajyDig9xV7BVywf DlAgYk7c9/OQgUYlc5m2qQJTkgWgTnpEnsM9v7wagzyoOtEK8i+W2o66dNtRxAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0 ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMC0xMC0xOFQwNzozNDozMiswMDowMGkk31EAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5 ADIwMjAtMTAtMThUMDc6MzQ6MzIrMDA6MDAYeWftAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Rocket To The Sky's _Cigars_: "Cigars" Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:32:43 +0300") Message-ID: <87h7qskl6y.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just > because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might > legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just > because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might > legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, or > may be unable to do so because of the GCC version they have > installed. We should continue supporting byte-compilation features > for the next few versions at least. Yes, of course. The only question is whether it makes sense to add new, advanced features that is only relevant for .elc files at this point > I have an email from Craig in late August saying the disclaimer is > being submitted to legal. Suggest to ping Craig about this. Will do. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 18 11:03:15 2020 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 15:03:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUADK-0006OY-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:03:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUADA-0006Nq-Fg for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:03:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAD5-0005sU-6o; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:02:59 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1851 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAD4-0001Qn-C2; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:02:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:03:02 +0300 Message-Id: <831rhvshjt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87h7qskl6y.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:33 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qskl6y.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:33 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just > > because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might > > legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, or > > may be unable to do so because of the GCC version they have > > installed. We should continue supporting byte-compilation features > > for the next few versions at least. > > Yes, of course. The only question is whether it makes sense to add new, > advanced features that is only relevant for .elc files at this point I think it does, for those very reasons. We cannot deprecate .elc files, certainly not yet. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 13 05:54:29 2021 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2021 09:54:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh833-0007ED-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:54:29 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh830-0007Dx-Fh for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:54:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ylr3yS9CFO88HnCZcWYmzwWs5A2qvya4AoAahUX9D/0=; b=VaEpbcssPw9eEG1eeYWSs0OGvn pQAXwwaX921FadTsnesyV5uNLHdIskHy+EktrA3Dx1M1Z+3p6OeR5WX4Bqczmhu0JriGzHk6theDk T/0Ni0wjQ3BiLhyI2nXfkuKj9Mmm/WVGCbcMFM8IfplEcg9DfI0ESNbaV2uHrtQBzxxw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lh82r-0002nF-Gi; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Zach Shaftel Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Chrome Hoof's _Pre-Emptive False Rapture_: "Spokes of Uridium" Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> (Zach Shaftel's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:48 -0400") Message-ID: <87v97nq7qu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Zach Shaftel writes: > My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be > merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. This was almost a year ago, and I can't see your assignment on file yet. Has the process stalled? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Zach Shaftel writes: > My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be > merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. This was almost a year ago, and I can't see your assignment on file yet. Has the process stalled? I've tried the patch, and it seems to work well. It does add code in the "hot path" of interpreting byte code, though, so I wonder whether there's any noticeable performance impact? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 13 05:54:32 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2021 09:54:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh835-0007ER-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:54:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh834-0007E2-Gn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:54:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GgzmwzNuF9ABBFb+dcqkZvtQGzSEEbR9Kjd+oXU2Qtc=; b=F8LU8c+6K7ddvUY/xSr6owFp0e hQI1y2BRIK6pPOBftESOcXfNAInglvqoKNl7EqbOJ8OAoK5Rlo36BMU67APzm+JouRdfphqn9icio Rwu4tlB9A+SDTpYn/wwEb6VrU5/mGOOPH+LuKorliWAG2wxV7uAI7atSbb5PW1TSKg3Y=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lh82w-0002nZ-UH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:22 +0200 Message-Id: <87tun7q7qp.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #42499 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 42499 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 42499 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 13 06:25:36 2021 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2021 10:25:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh8X9-0001wG-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 06:25:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lh8X7-0001w4-G1 for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 06:25:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lh8Wx-0006cu-Sd; Thu, 13 May 2021 06:25:28 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3704 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lh8Wx-0007em-DJ; Thu, 13 May 2021 06:25:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 13:25:35 +0300 Message-Id: <83k0o30w2o.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87v97nq7qu.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:17 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87v97nq7qu.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:54:17 +0200 > Cc: 42499@debbugs.gnu.org > > Zach Shaftel writes: > > > My copyright assignment is still pending so I assume this can't be > > merged until I hear back from copyright-clerk. > > This was almost a year ago, and I can't see your assignment on file > yet. Has the process stalled? Last I heard of that was last August, FWIW. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 12 08:15:04 2021 Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2021 12:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2XY-0004X1-H8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:15:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2XW-0004Tt-1n for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:15:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZK6sZrwcryEsPBh4MeB3S//kK9qLuGPWxhdZNFtDtTA=; b=nJsXGY2d9o5LL6D0xR2WK5xsrg eL1xefM8GEmBghUOyGoKOGLATTTzXvaFD/She+PxGMVbKROdi2DcuXYramYb9JUzlQWXPhyf1M0af hReCXFqn7gQpXOFfurZt0qZ5Qk79b26QmbZQ2QftCpDWkFowVbhd8dM0em2JShOF1e6Y=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2XO-0005UA-0w; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:14:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87v97nq7qu.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0o30w2o.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Colored Music's _Individual Beauty_: "Tamare Kurawanka (Previously Unreleased Version)" Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:14:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k0o30w2o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 13 May 2021 13:25:35 +0300") Message-ID: <87pmwr8eki.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This was almost a year ago, and I can't see your assignment on file >> yet. Has the process stalled? > > Last I heard of that was last August, FWIW. And that was a month ago, so it seems unlikely that there'll be further progress here, and I'm closing this bug report. If progress can be made, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42499 Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This was almost a year ago, and I can't see your assignment on file >> yet. Has the process stalled? > > Last I heard of that was last August, FWIW. And that was a month ago, so it seems unlikely that there'll be further progress here, and I'm closing this bug report. If progress can be made, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 12 08:15:08 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2021 12:15:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2Xb-0004an-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:15:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2Xa-0004U0-Ok for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:15:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xt0lkQTLX+ryVZFCdg86mQIO03l3QoOuyj2aUZmal54=; b=YedScXnFntKuIV5qZfBCDle6mq LVC4W3qKsHvaJMnwJtypqKdf18X8WgU10XHd05j/C+TyB6nsw4t0DGDCkCgOFEdkY8J0xZtyCqW3a pu64UTLgQZWZSz2lhTWsq9R7TPsvAlqnaPbtrGJXOzsX1P8TTFuqCaiuyF9w4UoZiLKw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ls2XT-0005UK-DJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:15:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:14:58 +0200 Message-Id: <87o8cb8ekd.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #42499 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 42499 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 42499 quit From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:00 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator