From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 19 01:10:06 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 05:10:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59861 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jx1aQ-0000Mv-1e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:10:06 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jx1aN-0000Mh-EC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:10:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jx1aN-0007YS-8J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:10:03 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:62064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jx1aL-0004f0-9l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:10:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73145B6D for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:09:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:content-type :date:date:reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:message-id :received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1595135396; x= 1596949797; bh=znaHEV8AJR40wn1jMVxUCd0mSkb1YK2WWeoERY0Cz3g=; b=Y i406Z3LeAJZaxLu5yPVJU+qsEur2MMtRjYMcFMA9wVFDr4/zTRhrfnHJlvYp1aGy t8g6wmIuHHukKIUxNQBERQV8wm3NAMeW3LpLMSZGDw+xiGz49LWj3IYQfAlGybJ9 EtRuRD2gi6CjUeTV/3rS8heXrcj2I/chmWQGBvgmJ19/Y3U8KyNWmDTm/YNSmVPX RVBRwPU2ylIY02bkd6PPw91323cIz+35zng35ryBf2CieHXsjO7wdk2gE3EEL4Dz nhEuPX4S5Gg0vI/d4yO+f8NB7Z4cv7qpfTLrXR2OUrGm0PplvRkja4lGiLkhgJ+7 Z+ISB/meCwoMeywxFDqQpgusjc4eIOz/xc3yzlxe1U/1i2GP+1aiS0rNJKL0Y8uP osWD2hgxvo/w+rXaCMuJKaP5FlvAbmCfZ4R0lhXyu7Qg52PsRtyOLjBG/SaXWk/F wIBPkr3cSWDGdPCmUA/YM4yZS9oNxdNR5PybAn5VlAl+21WDb+KZiBek2bAtoZjg iXomKyoStWni8tTLImdYva4VW/QkyPUKOC6jeiVRrwKOEUOOhHZqCJLx3vMzyztn q9MfiGJU4NQ9iknRCaO4Kf1Nx4Tbcv03cvt9SLOO+ruDimj6Vb639QQgtLEv9Y6Y I2BDGI33HxnzxChoo0zHq5gx5vwthDjd2n0iSPQvrU= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvsv0tfWkf94 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:09:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F9F58B for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:09:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.2]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1AFA70 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:09:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: icedtea: JAVA_HOME From: Christopher Howard To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:09:52 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=95.128.36.42; envelope-from=christopher.howard@qlfiles.net; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/19 01:09:57 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: christopher@librehacker.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, I'm not going to pretend to be a Java expert, but I was trying to build and run a Java application, and had to set JAVA_HOME manually. It is my understanding from my research[1] that applications often will want JAVA_HOME set to the path to the java install directory. It would seem like it would be useful if Guix set that as well for the icedtea and icedtea:jdk package. If there are good reasons for that not to be, perhaps more knowledgeable individuals will explain it. One part I'm not quite sure about is what JAVA_HOME would be set to if both icedtea and icedtea:jdk were installed. [1] Many JAVA_HOME results in a Startpage.com search -- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 19 06:29:25 2020 Received: (at 42423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 10:29:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59991 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jx6ZQ-0008Ik-S3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 06:29:25 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:46838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jx6ZO-0008Ia-6B for 42423@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 06:29:23 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d0645981; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:29:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=Qk3ulW7rk0rx28LoOwrrLR5wYgPfvo/86LqYBJ+R2kE=; b=Gjkl0jsz2t+7 Yh5SBL1TXdfg7GZWQNaNDDmogQMaSwQ3BY6yiwX6NGOLQRBH75lGnc0Qz0F3ZZbh j6mCFufLRNKYWdGYWB7S7+Lda4Rd5P0U32Ht8zWgU00WIIZt0VfNcZoG+roAcrLZ FdGnBQyxVLZTFLyjWONzu+yEWxNNuC2bsauF5kPJZQuL8MA9A5iQ7ZzPPosusK9A Q62rfU8f9t/jfCR7hv9YjAILhqPn9VNP/bRbK37SZDgbLarQ6Ckg1uWPR79aJ7Ne QzlwfSXu637HY4ECLnaJagy2LF4y3KY/xWqmW7PzwjKfwx+eaDmHyb7FOIeQgynA oqxsbWENAA== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 60c8aa7b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 06:29:06 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME To: christopher@librehacker.com, Christopher Howard , 42423@debbugs.gnu.org From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <74E0B4E8-9091-4C4C-A429-9B480446C956@lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42423 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le 19 juillet 2020 01:09:52 GMT-04:00, Christopher Howard a =C3=A9crit : >Hi, I'm not going to pretend to be a Java expert, but I was trying to >build and run a Java application, and had to set JAVA_HOME manually=2E It >is my understanding from my research[1] that applications often will >want JAVA_HOME set to the path to the java install directory=2E It would >seem like it would be useful if Guix set that as well for the icedtea >and icedtea:jdk package=2E > >If there are good reasons for that not to be, perhaps more >knowledgeable individuals will explain it=2E > >One part I'm not quite sure about is what JAVA_HOME would be set to if >both icedtea and icedtea:jdk were installed=2E > >[1] Many JAVA_HOME results in a Startpage=2Ecom search icedtea being a subset of icedtea:jdk, you can't install both in the same = profile anyway=2E From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 31 07:49:57 2020 Received: (at 42423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2020 11:49:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1TXw-0007uN-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:49:56 -0400 Received: from wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.231]:49478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1TXu-0007uD-NF for 42423@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:49:55 -0400 Received: from www.rohleder.de ([37.61.204.227]); authenticated by wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1k1TXs-0008SC-GA; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:49:52 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (helo=micha) by www.rohleder.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k1TXr-0007ap-8h; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:49:52 +0200 From: Michael Rohleder To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME References: X-PGP-Fingerprint: 755E 2DE5 D0D5 85C5 2E78 2830 7C7A FFBE FEF2 CB25 X-PGP-Key: https://www.rohleder.de/~mike/pgpkey.asc Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:49:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Christopher Howard's message of "Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:09:52 -0800") Message-ID: <873657ewfb.fsf@rohleder.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mike@rohleder.de;1596196194;acf5d1c9; X-HE-SMSGID: 1k1TXs-0008SC-GA X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42423 Cc: christopher@librehacker.com, 42423@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christopher, Christopher Howard writes: > Hi, I'm not going to pretend to be a Java expert, but I was trying to > build and run a Java application, and had to set JAVA_HOME manually. It > is my understanding from my research[1] that applications often will > want JAVA_HOME set to the path to the java install directory. It would > seem like it would be useful if Guix set that as well for the icedtea > and icedtea:jdk package. > > If there are good reasons for that not to be, perhaps more > knowledgeable individuals will explain it. > > One part I'm not quite sure about is what JAVA_HOME would be set to if > both icedtea and icedtea:jdk were installed. I dont think this is a good idea (or even possible?): From=20a Developer POV I think its pretty common to have many jdk's install= ed (8,11,14 sometimes even 7). To what should JAVA_HOME be set/defaults in this case? I dont know a distribution which sets JAVA_HOME (per default) and I think its much better to let the user or sysadmin decide which one is best... --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAl8kBVgACgkQfHr/vv7y yyXMFwgAuQk5XitWaIsEba9Hg41WQBBGB5SipkUyxC+oy2CkVCzREYb/ZoWDc1gV v0p+SRBc11suVaTsD96PdVtHuvx7xJ6u/Cb0eNdBI/L0DKFC/Og1zCAujYfeG5I9 ClI3Mgj07y7H6QnxLV0vyDyz5hF3QPtzUdKY1KAT+u8XGhOMWuRaGJf9fRV+GWHq sElnUVV5tE2g0DgEGoyWWOaQyvt2J63fzHd9Ql8NlUq4Zn0Dp27nPCQWiiF6HF4H aOh3QUY5b/NW7bTDfg6IYv4Pcw26I0beIesk8wimuNbHBYDxYVmhnmMddRfBvWhx WT/l8KyRckcMmXDYroNgfwYj9ImiDQ== =tlJm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 31 10:15:05 2020 Received: (at 42423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2020 14:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1VoP-0005On-HF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:15:05 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.41]:21134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1VoL-0005Nt-7V for 42423@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:15:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C970FDE8; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:14:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:content-type :references:in-reply-to:date:date:reply-to:from:from:subject :subject:message-id:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1596204893; x=1598019294; bh=WFkVEYfyDj0AQm2GVDf5LPEemZ0NJw2d hoCo1yzmTOE=; b=N/y9WiJ/RkZjUeqhDI76NveP7VYnR8ZvB+N9cx1DvoFjr1eJ Jafeh6T5n8TPIt19gY8XZSzAP3mNVGqw82bIriOZrpAgVs/prvkWXYJFmhdhDldf ZvVxrENQk2Ye7h0vVABvom5XTk8/lESmE4hgpHcdZagWRGrbBBCj7Q/x3kMp7Wm3 cXJMXwk81fa6XEHY7aKnQAa+HFFRU5bh8JXgM++h9xJBSSH2lF5GRdwZn9IkltAf +pczSTUzweMgaGL9PANDu45IiegcnptZl821Kfk6nnVZbLPRiUGlb8mLwgNVmt2b SB5AklALG394P78T01r6ZyaRHBnIoO1iiY0bRkpGRbsJlDhxBkpohQkkea+j51gh ItmGpw0PZIeyE01M0sxF8N1M2OCtR+GvdjCBDqR0gceQgF4OqHgVMe2xijydwzSW UmUVZWPn2KrzOD/xLykRq0sMw7Udtgqwe1E3jyTkvc00OkWZjtVk+L0vCj138bI8 sahqe63LwPSuc+mluVZqDfRQnRZKxdlwrNJY2QBWUUWtz7HvrUniC/i/bQiB2Cgc KrKvjdBSc1pEulFxE8ft55yo8aZIedk5jO/QAG/Qt9yRADI++G46/CNQ0aXcQ3YV b/RuLGUkE0IHPkZCKp7C35QZIs7PU8YPnekYTh9/JaF36nkBCuxCmOjL4oo= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1a4UbmGy9umF; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:14:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC77355; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B3CA9F; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <939e8f05889aebe8be0aa2dd51f356a260d7ecc3.camel@qlfiles.net> Subject: Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME From: Christopher Howard To: Michael Rohleder Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:14:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <873657ewfb.fsf@rohleder.de> References: <873657ewfb.fsf@rohleder.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42423 Cc: 42423@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: christopher@librehacker.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I am open to learning more and to guix developer wisdom. I don't quite understand your argument, though — I wouldn't think this would be any more difficult a question than deciding what version of the java binary would show up in your profile: you would only select one version in a profile. If you need to work with multiple versions (not talking about dependencies) you would create multiple profiles, or multiple manifest files to use with guix environment. I would assume if we are talking about guix package dependencies, you are relying on the direct paths. But practical case here is if you just download some Java code and run "ant build" or "ant run": that won't work unless "JAVA_HOME" is defined, which is a bother to figure out yourself every time you want to update your profile. This is what I have to do to get arduino-ide running (as well as running patchelf on the generated binaries, but that is another story...) -- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 13:49 +0200, Michael Rohleder wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Christopher Howard writes: > > Hi, I'm not going to pretend to be a Java expert, but I was trying > > to > > build and run a Java application, and had to set JAVA_HOME > > manually. It > > is my understanding from my research[1] that applications often > > will > > want JAVA_HOME set to the path to the java install directory. It > > would > > seem like it would be useful if Guix set that as well for the > > icedtea > > and icedtea:jdk package. > > > > If there are good reasons for that not to be, perhaps more > > knowledgeable individuals will explain it. > > > > One part I'm not quite sure about is what JAVA_HOME would be set to > > if > > both icedtea and icedtea:jdk were installed. > > I dont think this is a good idea (or even possible?): > > From a Developer POV I think its pretty common to have many jdk's > installed > (8,11,14 sometimes even 7). To what should JAVA_HOME be set/defaults > in this > case? > > I dont know a distribution which sets JAVA_HOME (per default) and I > think its much better to let the user or sysadmin decide which one is > best... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 31 11:10:49 2020 Received: (at 42423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2020 15:10:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WgK-0006uD-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:10:49 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WgH-0006u0-8D for 42423@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:10:47 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596208242; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=CGr/isJPMxBasu27OTfwwQahUh62LH+IP4sJIt2x4Sj9rzMYHtFfFkRMIFI6Yih6d0wdMBlivTBnoETqRkTnTL6V7+0/1jqqBawkpnOWamR8ypZqY2qQAt9XICd/ZwA1j5CyWxsjBzSpS+LIP9Wy5yzkycViorPcfDWt6I7FzGQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1596208242; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=Dunu6TTNvI1huvsf51v8jwRki1yDgYS7MgFUJ+ppm2E=; b=XDhRhWdkT+vsW7xSJFJNL0S+RVPi4mTghzXUvGUC7CB/o+HSmhOhECAs4nUt66ws0uH7j+C3SuIJi26O5F60rZHbP+D7k26opW2cDVtYTnSVO6k7KfGzvsWzOlwNtBwL8i1G/xrKtKJ/BmdBLFgmgSg8/vlakJxWte7+MhIDaiQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1596208242; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=Dunu6TTNvI1huvsf51v8jwRki1yDgYS7MgFUJ+ppm2E=; b=acRb26cFry9Lb+6ouB4ieDieyUT4HGFyCPOUJHM5Vn24PuNdv4dKQFaVB/goSstY niIIpd6Swo6EEp7Qe2iAWVzJXjFIufr9upih4ASV4tZYuQOn0PzoX84VlHDsCh8irwH h3f8hbI/bqNWAqCoa5LBOHlG7YWNBxsR5K9u8Mtw= Received: from localhost (p54ad486b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.72.107]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 15962082371991017.8632511692268; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:10:37 -0700 (PDT) References: <873657ewfb.fsf@rohleder.de> <939e8f05889aebe8be0aa2dd51f356a260d7ecc3.camel@qlfiles.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: christopher@librehacker.com Subject: Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME In-reply-to: <939e8f05889aebe8be0aa2dd51f356a260d7ecc3.camel@qlfiles.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:10:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7tnhg9j.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42423 Cc: 42423@debbugs.gnu.org, Michael Rohleder , Christopher Howard X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Christopher Howard writes: > [=E2=80=A6] This is what I > have to do to get arduino-ide running (as well as running patchelf on > the generated binaries, but that is another story...) Recently, I also built the Arduino IDE to upload the software onto my Open Theremin. Instead of using patchelf I opted to make the loader available globally: ln -s $(guix build glibc)/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ On Guix System we can also use =E2=80=9Cextra-special-file=E2=80=9D: (extra-special-file "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" (file-append glibc "/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2")) --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 12:16:20 2024 Received: (at 42423-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2024 16:16:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6uJw-0006Kd-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 12:16:20 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.154]:37088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6uJu-0006KT-Bc for 42423-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 12:16:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10421B2731; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:16:12 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=kolabnow.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received:received :received; s=dkim20240523; t=1730477771; x=1732292172; bh=jCKlaW 4ratyXJD2WvaNjAHTpIHn4saLbu7ooB1+cyMM=; b=PttVjEv1PGwek0L7tCBpmW EUbMADJaciM8It+il1/uO2RDDp5c3DSJlkcl8oTjzOg2BVywA25QLkrxTKQTdfI8 nYcNYj2mDi3CcjGIy3QwTAZocmfdSKewb7DWRhn0Dl3t5pF+c4zDU6ntKHOdUviX vnsJ/zCir14O5pbNmtXguwjVcJ2iqXic3e45wLDsOeTzpFYoVGwxpMkTDE1Jqhwq mu5B7dfFCJdt2Kf6Rw7yX1JYYrBLbuuSncPREErYoG7eLiGTXvLxczvjvviPBhmi d6geqZd9wDzGF6/F6hljlIzHsnrqBLFJ+qRN921L+JE2PeginKPmWx2k/xZlHsOg == X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id o_C2MZQSQvDq; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:16:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx011.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.11]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C2A21B2730; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm010.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.10]) by int-mx011.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3095A30C4C94; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:16:10 +0100 (CET) From: Christopher Howard To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME In-Reply-To: Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:10:32 +0200 (4 years, 13 weeks, 2 days ago)" Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 08:16:07 -0800 Message-ID: <87a5ej6ibc.fsf@librehacker.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42423-done Cc: Michael Rohleder , 42423-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Looking at this bug report after a few years, the question doesn't seem worthy of more attention. Closing my bug report. -- Christopher Howard From unknown Mon Aug 18 19:34:00 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator