GNU bug report logs - #42366
UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs

Previous Next

Full log

Message #57 received at 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200

>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:38:38 +0300
    >> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
    >> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
    >> 
    >> What exactly is surprising here?  In a TTY frame, Emacs doesn't
    >> control the layout: the terminal emulator does.  Emacs just sends
    >> codes to the terminal device, and that's it.

    Eli> To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display in a
    Eli> GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours.  You are now
    Eli> saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't control
    Eli> the layout at all.

I donʼt think I said that. The TTY frame layout looks ok, the gui
frame one has what looks like extra pixels between the characters.

Robert

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.