GNU bug report logs - #42366
UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200
>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:38:38 +0300
    >> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
    >> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
    >> 
    >> What exactly is surprising here?  In a TTY frame, Emacs doesn't
    >> control the layout: the terminal emulator does.  Emacs just sends
    >> codes to the terminal device, and that's it.

    Eli> To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display in a
    Eli> GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours.  You are now
    Eli> saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't control
    Eli> the layout at all.

I donʼt think I said that. The TTY frame layout looks ok, the gui
frame one has what looks like extra pixels between the characters.

Robert




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 17 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.