GNU bug report logs - #42366
UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:22:33 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 12:26:55 +0200
>> Cc: 42366 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> > Compare how
>> > $ qrencode -t UTF8 x
>> > looks in
>> > $ emacs -nw -f shell # vs.
>> > $ emacs     -f shell
>> >
>> > As you can see in the latter it is quite mangled,
>> > perhaps beyond machine recognition.
>> 
>> It's not good in any case, really.  Here's the X version:
>
> Can you send the file itself?

There's no file -- it's just the output from the qrencode command.

>> Note the horizontal lines -- it should be a solid white field.
>
> How do you know that?

Because that's how it displays in the shell:

[Message part 2 (image/png, inline)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

And besides, a QR Code isn't supposed to have horizontal lines like
that.

> Hmm... shell-mode?  Now I'm beginning to think I don't really
> understand what are the steps to reproduce the problem, and what is
> their meaning (jidanni needs to learn how to report bugs clearly).
> Would you please describe the steps, starting from "emacs -Q"?

There's not much to it: Run the qrencode program:

$ qrencode -t UTF8 x

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.