GNU bug report logs - #42339
[PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-intermediate: Fixup the pre-configure phase.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
Cc: 42339 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#42339] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-intermediate: Fixup the pre-configure phase.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:49:17 +0200

Hi,

Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net> skribis:

> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net> skribis:
>> 
>> > * gnu/packages/commencement.scm
>> >   (glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash)[arguments]: Don't patch sunrpc,
>> >   as it's no longer required. Tweak C_INCLUDE_PATH and
>> >   CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.

[...]

>> > The debug output does not refer to a bootstrap glibc anymore whether the phase
>> > is there or not, though it does refer to gcc-cross-boot0:lib. Does this
>> > mean that the phase is simply obsolete, and only the hurd parts should
>> > remain, or is the reference to gcc a bug? Perhaps gcc should have a
>> > separate output for the includes it provides (stdarg and such) so that
>> > this reference doesn't bring in the whole mesboot tree? This would
>> > improve the closure of gcc-toolchain:debug...
>> 
>> Oooh, nice.  LGTM!
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
>> Please confirm that nothing breaks (everything builds at least up to
>> ‘gcc-final’) and you can push to ‘core-updates’.
>
> I have confirmed that hello builds both natively and cross-built. On a
> similar topic, the same test succeeded for removing the native-gcc input.
> As the comment suggests, it was only being used for --enable-obsolete-rpc.
> I am thus considering a v2 that also removes said input. Does that make
> sense?

Yes it does (again provided nothing breaks).

Thank you!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.