GNU bug report logs - #42295
[PATCH] gnu: rust-1.44: Add rustfmt output.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Matthew Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>
To: John Soo <jsoo1 <at> asu.edu>
Cc: 42295 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#42295] [PATCH] gnu: rust-1.44: Add rustfmt output.
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:25:48 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi John,

On 11/25/20 6:46 AM, John Soo wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks! I had packaged rustfmt-nightly but this is much better.
>
> Matthew Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org> writes:
>
>> +             (replace 'check
>> +               (lambda* _
>> +                 ;; Enable parallel execution.
>> +                 (let ((parallel-job-spec
>> +                        (string-append "-j" (number->string
>> +                                             (min 4
>> +                                                  (parallel-job-count))))))
>> +                   (invoke "./x.py" parallel-job-spec "test" "-vv")
>> +                   (invoke "./x.py" parallel-job-spec "test"
>> +                           "src/tools/cargo")
>> +                   (invoke "./x.py" parallel-job-spec "test"
>> +                           "src/tools/rustfmt"))))
> Nice!
>
>> +      (outputs '("out" "doc" "cargo" "rustfmt"))
> Perhaps we should make anything that can be installed as a rustup
> component an output (provided the source is in the rust tree). I think
> rls can be added immediately in the same fashion.
Is rls deprecated in favor of rust-analyzer?
> Do you want to add a copyright line?
Done.
> Otherwise, this looks good to me.

According to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt, rustfmt was made a 
component in 1.24.0.  Would it be better to add this support to the 
rust-1.24 package instead?  I've attached the patch I'm currently testing.

-- 
Matthew Kraai

[patch (text/plain, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.