GNU bug report logs - #4217
23.1; probable mode-line bug

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#4217: marked as done (23.1; probable mode-line bug)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:05:05 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:59:34 -0400
with message-id <7py6p7uvop.fsf <at> fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#4217: 23.1; probable mode-line bug
has caused the Emacs bug report #4217,
regarding 23.1; probable mode-line bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)


-- 
4217: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4217
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.1; probable mode-line bug
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:30:55 -0400

In this bit in "bindings.el" from the code that sets the modeline
format:

	 `(which-func-mode ("" which-func-format ,dashes))
	 `(global-mode-string (,dashes global-mode-string))

it looks like there is a typo, and the first line should also have the
dashes before the format string.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 4217-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#4217: 23.1; probable mode-line bug
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:59:34 -0400

>> Although the "--" at the end of the global-mode-string entry are not
>> necessary (being followed by -%-), I think it makes sense to have
>> all the entries be the same, so that entries can be
>> removed/added/reordered easily.

This still makes sense to me, so that's what I installed.
The appearance of the end result is the same.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.