GNU bug report logs - #42164
Combining file-append with gexps results in incomprehensible errors

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 42164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brian Cully <bjc <at> spork.org>
To: 42164 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Combining file-append with gexps results in incomprehensible errors
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 12:03:21 -0400

	I was having a similar issue, so I dug into this issue a bit,
and it turns out that you *can* select an output from file-append, but
the syntax is a bit wonky:

---[snip]---
(let ((fa (file-append pkg "/path")))
  $~$#fa:output)
---[snip]---

	I’ve tried to remove the let:

---[snip]---
$~$#(file-append pkg "/path"):output
---[snip]---

	But this confuses the reader, an it things ‘:output’ is a
variable. Not too surprising, but it does make the Guix configuration
files more awkward, since now you have to ‘define’ the file-append
operations at the top level so you can refer to them with the syntax
above.

	I would prefer to have something like any of the following (in
order of preference):

---[snip]---
(file-append pkg:output "/path")
(file-append (list pkg "output") "/path")
(file-append $~$#pkg:output "/path")
---[snip]---

	The reason being that it’s awkward to select the output after
the file-append due to syntax, and it’s less intuitive than trying to
select the output directly from the package inside the file-append (and
it seems I’m not alone in this). I’ve been through the code, so to some
degree I realize why things are being done the way they are, but that
doesn’t change my current preferences.

	I prefer the list over the gexp/ungexp because we already use
lists to select outputs in other parts of the config declarations, and
the gexp/ungexp stuff is harder to understand from the point-of-view of
a user, rather than package author. It’s also not present in the
majority of configs, I’d wager.

	Before I found the “correct” way to do things, I did cobble
together some code that allowed the (list pkg "output") form to work,
and would be happy to submit it upstream. It’s not perfect, since it
ignores the ‘output’ argument in the gexp expander in favor of the
stored output in the file-append, but I don’t think that’s an actual
issue in practice.

-bjc

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.