From unknown Sat Aug 09 09:32:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#42112 <42112@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#42112 <42112@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL Reply-To: bug#42112 <42112@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 16:32:56 +0000 retitle 42112 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL reassign 42112 emacs submitter 42112 "Basil L. Contovounesios" severity 42112 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 28 12:42:00 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2020 16:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaNT-0007kv-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:42:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaNQ-0007km-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:41:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaNQ-00071y-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:41:56 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]:36460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaNO-0001Nb-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:41:56 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id e11so13310457qkm.3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WYmoJX9ymfba4x9yQjspOsj7mvPdlkSp2VrLFmjtcCM=; b=N/aPJrKB1GkXzO7tcUMWJ5+hX5il3CL04vjD8HBL80F3sa97SvYQ4Uaad3qFkt00Ne CWxE3X0qXwIkOnHjXdYEHsarNbXs5bl4yN1bDtIWZUTPxYnI2jPImCtSelBoI6eLWQOq K+fl6tdcIf+TwXWj5dClOdN/IlS9t44qdXXRp2NcOMGFQQoEdT7DfKpez2Z3xJjjFXwJ 4ZBCFN7ZytCcE9nmDRB0rsUJjZNBetEoCg7WN80omg0bQi7Dk76zig2aWvvNWEMfLg+o POE2v2Nk61fVapmp+Ul49O8CKgm9mDnfrhLF3CrQGzPgqRlxxWR/0dKVv9lAGLOxjC8n pRRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=WYmoJX9ymfba4x9yQjspOsj7mvPdlkSp2VrLFmjtcCM=; b=nStaqIaC323LTg6uAtza2Ny4TH7ME0pUMbyIYD1AwbMXyWsni3k8bkoUVWW5jwcQh3 f9WsMr0eNJV7PpG5dwdmah/+i3YriVZabub7xzGMMsc8YbcGRv5ldeT0QNcx55YWcPjC rwz2cGrlhWf7tmz7cKuHqyM8EL3gkeDQzI8b5vz8iu7zMWJOfVZurW2TFJKEStq8DNdm aeLahxfsMsBX+PuC0NIr4+0nGGFZ2TlEVYZn6pfySXcPJfSwNcesvsOoM5g7ECogeYaP gVBp34qbqYx3I0I6TFMVrzQySsH1Ueh1Srg+XVC1aWIK8BkLVD/qDJiN7b66p4V1jfaL 2D3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VaQCiKUxkGZ1lYo14VeLf5Rq0WBwnQ5QFlifKSk+zz2cyim7M /kXzeb9h52HBw1+RO5vJRudzuZw5TRw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXnNrmInkidl4Y1S6DfLNvyHG/5qHSN79wiQ70sCzTj8Ti9E8esfKP7ARjW9EXQIraiQB4fg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:7ea:: with SMTP id k10mr11438981qkk.418.1593362511118; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:92bd:1bfd:38fc:fae2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm12777496qkl.18.2020.06.28.09.41.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:41:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:41:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c; envelope-from=contovob@tcd.ie; helo=mail-qk1-x72c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Severity: minor Steps to reproduce: 0. emacs -Q 1. M-x whitespace-mode RET 2. M-< In Emacs 26, line 3 is highlighted with the whitespace-empty face all the way to the right fringe. In Emacs 27, only the first two columns of line 3 are highlighted with the whitespace-empty face. Is this TRT? Should whitespace-empty get an ':extend t' attribute or inherit from some other face which already has that? Thanks, -- Basil In GNU Emacs 27.0.91 (build 23, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2020-06-28 built on thunk Repository revision: cce00bef0313bc42beee8096d9312313889dc92d Repository branch: emacs-27 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12008000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid Configured using: 'configure 'CC=ccache gcc' 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 -ggdb -gdwarf-4' --config-cache --prefix=/home/blc/.local --program-suffix=27 --enable-checking=yes,glyphs --enable-check-lisp-object-type --with-x-toolkit=lucid --with-file-notification=yes --with-x' Configured features: XAW3D XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS GLIB NOTIFY INOTIFY ACL LIBSELINUX GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE HARFBUZZ M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS LUCID X11 XDBE XIM MODULES THREADS LIBSYSTEMD JSON PDUMPER LCMS2 GMP From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 28 12:54:32 2020 Received: (at 42112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2020 16:54:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaZc-00083S-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:54:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaZZ-00083F-Jq for 42112@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:54:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaZU-00030F-01; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:54:24 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3310 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jpaZT-0000Mf-DT; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:54:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:54:10 +0300 Message-Id: <837dvr2kst.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" In-Reply-To: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) Subject: Re: bug#42112: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL References: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42112 Cc: 42112@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:41:48 +0100 > > 0. emacs -Q > 1. M-x whitespace-mode RET > 2. M-< > > In Emacs 26, line 3 is highlighted with the whitespace-empty face all > the way to the right fringe. > > In Emacs 27, only the first two columns of line 3 are highlighted with > the whitespace-empty face. > > Is this TRT? I don't know: I don't use this mode. > Should whitespace-empty get an ':extend t' attribute or inherit from > some other face which already has that? If we want the empty lines to be shown in this face in their entirety, then it should have the :extend attribute, yes. Just make sure it looks OK with underline and other non-color attributes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 28 13:35:07 2020 Received: (at 42112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2020 17:35:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbCt-0000gA-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:35:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f179.google.com ([209.85.160.179]:38575) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbCq-0000fS-Ge for 42112@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:35:05 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so11248347qts.5 for <42112@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:35:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=rZFDL9ufSbk4U6h7tUj7hSV0Ee8kaVNkyQEdpK4CTSo=; b=kdwirSuL29GEh1sfi8zSgS3h0AM0ay3l/wnhyOVprVLWeh/8b5tq1SnlAGkgclNmWG DqW1A7A6fDGWPbBUL2f5JpyrYNytP3eRjN303OXBE+fdJ7sZnQANWK4UZqUlqo0iD40A NaeriViMqPTEwE8mTYNGur2cuJ40+ld78wX0hBqPSmEYdwUNARM6VaGctzs8IoJEeqBa UDTfe0sKJQ2Xu5JAbaXG1orvd6xsvQJo1ptIroNOydzddTRBj9FFgFNrBENHVq8wiuSx UXoWS2EvQBnVG/j7MO0iU/Dtcun6KXrGu0p2/uKoeIL/T1YLWvNb5G8QP2JRF0CKZ/hx aK4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=rZFDL9ufSbk4U6h7tUj7hSV0Ee8kaVNkyQEdpK4CTSo=; b=AwiOSLEnrpmHBzCgFg/Is9O0g0hnpRSY1aoY6W8qvp9tIitCNUX0AZqu60gxQ6b9zL DUME7K4RaFt/PQF+aaycK1JckjLFQWc5hOw50X6FnuwRFkjmUAeIdp3YhqNF0qs/e+IC m1XC4DjhzSTp6xzaLBBrj2Ynxsd4S2Tx7TAxeIiT6OCFSLA3U+qnxqmz4bXkbEYe5tLM SoZFkyiPvyFiOC9NC+nYYl5Cz7rJ40lqci9C9hsXZjjVHuLPP66miqgfzLSnkPc2++Wh SkRYL9hvfts1GgxvU3ehJB+KBWpqK0n3e56X0vSUpzCszzokexVGdJdWK37qXds6CEU1 rqCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533m3ALj12ZIkQVUdtigP5VKPNHwKiv4mrMK9CoXMookCrWake5L bxR+6CqwiTZQmA0H/ZzoKejBIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPj6yP0EtyvbGg3LAOLN+u6nxxgbVvxRPNjrB9QGCo/tXI9hB1WvZN4pvH/goAPimadzjKrQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:348f:: with SMTP id w15mr12427910qtb.79.1593365698885; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:92bd:1bfd:38fc:fae2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a22sm5701693qka.64.2020.06.28.10.34.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#42112: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL References: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> <837dvr2kst.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 18:34:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <837dvr2kst.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:54:10 +0300") Message-ID: <877dvrt7pb.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42112 Cc: 42112@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" >> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:41:48 +0100 >> >> 0. emacs -Q >> 1. M-x whitespace-mode RET >> 2. M-< >> >> In Emacs 26, line 3 is highlighted with the whitespace-empty face all >> the way to the right fringe. >> >> In Emacs 27, only the first two columns of line 3 are highlighted with >> the whitespace-empty face. >> >> Is this TRT? > > I don't know: I don't use this mode. I do, but I'm not sure what constitutes correct behaviour. I guess the Emacs 26 behaviour is how the feature was designed and what users have come to expect, in which case Emacs 27 exhibits a regression. >> Should whitespace-empty get an ':extend t' attribute or inherit from >> some other face which already has that? > > If we want the empty lines to be shown in this face in their entirety, > then it should have the :extend attribute, yes. Is there any practical difference or preference between giving whitespace-empty an :extend attribute vs making it inherit from a face with an :extend attribute? > Just make sure it looks OK with underline and other non-color > attributes. Will do in about a week's time if no-one beats me to it. Thanks, -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 28 14:17:38 2020 Received: (at 42112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2020 18:17:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbs2-0001l8-C3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:17:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbs0-0001kt-1Y for 42112@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:17:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbru-00052y-E5; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:17:30 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4603 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jpbrt-0006zy-Ja; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:17:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:17:19 +0300 Message-Id: <831rlz2gy8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" In-Reply-To: <877dvrt7pb.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) Subject: Re: bug#42112: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL References: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> <837dvr2kst.fsf@gnu.org> <877dvrt7pb.fsf@tcd.ie> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42112 Cc: 42112@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Cc: 42112@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 18:34:56 +0100 > > Is there any practical difference or preference between giving > whitespace-empty an :extend attribute vs making it inherit from a face > with an :extend attribute? Inheritance makes display slightly slower (due to the need to chase the inheritance chain). And frankly I don't see why we would need to use inheritance here in the first place. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 31 10:53:14 2021 Received: (at 42112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2021 14:53:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMT-0002N8-Rs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:53:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMS-0002Mu-KC for 42112@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:53:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KGiM3TzVLNfEiyczWg7trPLcdop17NslQjrb9kWL1pk=; b=SrPQn4fhNfX7hYRRR4V164Vrsz 3eudHUSPefqiWbxDS+PRanqWausUbwZu2f2BmcKWxf8g7GOPxg/old0BClIJyY915gGvvmHL0yU5c LUkbu8CUeao4w4CQ1FTJEO7svQvIk5ogey9CIB4J+gjIee4IaM331ZzIszqZhw2CcGWQ=; Received: from 2.149.45.105.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.149.45.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMK-0004gN-01; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:53:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Subject: Re: bug#42112: 27.0.91; whitespace-empty face not extended beyond EOL References: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:53:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7uv5eib.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Sun, 28 Jun 2020 17:41:48 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1feedrl.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > In Emacs 26, line 3 is highlighted with the whitespace-empty face all > the way to the right fringe. I've now restored this in Emacs 28. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42112 Cc: 42112@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > In Emacs 26, line 3 is highlighted with the whitespace-empty face all > the way to the right fringe. I've now restored this in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 31 10:53:21 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2021 14:53:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMb-0002NU-3R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:53:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMZ-0002NA-9A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:53:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l22PBQe6RoufPE8+8LbxKo5itsOAfF91opZ7kRpauPQ=; b=Uqk/vG2/cJI0twWt2O1Mb0avOG aK4wokp4f7ntWtjvQzTsc6KkSxyTpOCMwGGs8MCPA42M5IqSIXVrlSV+2P1E6jGKCAa3LWPWd+YlL v7vYwLrTACTPY1Qj8pi+l6LtiVhOxcjjReFUClz6lFiM9xaLLojRe2UEyUNKI3PM0SjM=; Received: from 2.149.45.105.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.149.45.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9qMR-0004gW-8k for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:53:13 +0200 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:53:09 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmuyedre.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #42112 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 42112 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 42112 28.1 quit From unknown Sat Aug 09 09:32:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator