GNU bug report logs - #41988
28.0.50; Edebug unconditionally instruments definitions with &define specs

Previous Next

Full log

Message #37 received at 41988 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 41988 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#41988: 28.0.50; Edebug unconditionally instruments
 definitions with &define specs
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:37:45 +0100

Am Mo., 8. März 2021 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
<p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>:
>
> Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 18:28 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
> <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>:
> >
> > Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb Stefan Monnier
> > <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>:
> > >
> > > > As an example, edebug-instrument (C-u C-M-x) the following definition:
> > > >
> > > > (defun bar ()
> > > >   (cl-flet ((foo () 1))
> > > >     (foo)))
> > > >
> > > > The *Messages* buffer now says
> > > >
> > > > Edebug: foo [2 times]
> > > > Edebug: bar
> > >
> > > I believe this is now fixed in `master`.
> > > At least we only get a total of 2 messages rather than "3 collapsed to 2".
> > > But I don't know enough about the code coverage to be sure that the
> > > underlying problem you saw is also fixed.  Can you confirm?
> >
> > Thanks! I'll check (hopefully in the next few days).
>
> Confirmed that the original issue is indeed fixed.

Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon. The original issue with cl-flet is indeed
fixed, but I think one likely explanation for that is that it now only
has a single &define form. What about other macros that still have
multiple &define forms in an &or form? Are they fixed as well?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.