From unknown Sat Aug 16 12:43:55 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#41922 <41922@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#41922 <41922@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Question about signature file of emacs binaries distribution Reply-To: bug#41922 <41922@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 19:43:55 +0000 retitle 41922 Question about signature file of emacs binaries distribution reassign 41922 emacs submitter 41922 Phillip Lord severity 41922 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 17 13:11:39 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2020 17:11:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52095 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlbb9-0001GE-DP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:11:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlbb5-0001G5-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:11:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlbb5-0003vZ-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:11:35 -0400 Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([78.129.138.110]:59706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlbb3-0001dy-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:11:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ObGK4PnmyT7FmzacoRMYD1ygG5atF/OpVEELSa2Omy8=; b=S4iD/fjweMPx1xq5mnxcjaM+4 ts3Lze+k36Ep4yFtv3uP1/edtMI3rO5Ll25ebziDfkgFemwretr3nzUcCioebTl1Kny2oaAQv8tOq ZEPEzACufjZ/k2/NbzoSA1MEnaB5pea8z9+I7EZ5yNyDJYM9CJpZv5TxgDYYCWHQf2uCOgqVaTgFk kmMpLkx9xBV9zH6/wQHE6ylv/2Cp3RbWypn0UVhCtBZd5EG8QC2KkkV5k1S59scJPoYIvxd384pH8 OEXvHEep2DXp7tjVNZ1ZLGo6UEbyfHZRFGFUYDTa/ELtNeDTpUEhcZC9GSpKT2zGuhrifo06maYs4 oj4+Ngi/w==; Received: from cpc142652-benw12-2-0-cust953.16-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.21.43.186]:36334 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jlbb0-000658-Tp; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:11:30 +0100 From: Phillip Lord To: Dev Prabhu Subject: Re: Question about signature file of emacs binaries distribution References: Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:11:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dev Prabhu's message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:57:36 -0500") Message-ID: <87pn9xwrb1.fsf@russet.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Received-SPF: none client-ip=78.129.138.110; envelope-from=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk; helo=cloud103.planethippo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/17 13:11:31 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Dev Prabhu writes: > Hi, > > I downloaded emacs distribution for windows 64-bit binaries > (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip) and the associated signature file > (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip.sig) from the location > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-26/ > > My attempt to verify the signature says that the signing certificate has > expired a few months ago. > Is it still safe to use this download? Yes. I am considering what to do about the expired key. Phil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 17 21:43:15 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2020 01:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jljaD-00054B-0z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:43:15 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlirD-0003tN-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:56:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlirD-00012F-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:56:43 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]:44510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlir8-0005xM-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:56:42 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x202so3526361oix.11 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:56:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gOhFuTNvQkr+Fkil6KH7Sa8909xQhBZleXRPT94S/Fg=; b=kk5CSSq1tqSm5SE8et62sPPCdY7CNu6vlV1bJjKSGPHeTmVexmvU4LJJ/eCpgrNJsI cM5bkXp/jnBD6sUafJ/vxX/1DR+biULppqHpiAhK+zVEHjaoSFjXW6FNZFeMM8lXQWs7 S/eQ37hclq81dQnYM+ZGZmZDBWQXSqMbucmONxATWiOHBX03FjHpcYVYmhNjjT+/Uy07 F3KwCsi/MhWuHtRTMcxZ+qj7t64L8NHAOIp3xOWhW/JZAUdZT3EV9CIDOnCPXdIi6los WoqW7Ii7rRghlvNGxB0v11+3z6x1Np/9NbmSOK39GsorCrY//e/87ctz0ond9F/AhdpY nWnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gOhFuTNvQkr+Fkil6KH7Sa8909xQhBZleXRPT94S/Fg=; b=SJrmncF7sfya8LGyQp1TdEGV/ee2gpxBH04Wbo0/FWU/BXlZTdQd6JeBkGgykbGPUo x9u3Ze6V2CKrSM5vUuFszxjLQm9DHzPHeFMUxx5xcmHkJV87L1963nyv9xUjLbnfS5vy GN/3l7NFcogZmU79h7A6se8W6Mm8AkXSelf7a7Mn9f5yRFCGU0ie4AcFQ6wHa7TsukSP fpYcHah502oVGj8fr16GwxnaH+2iUMrmuwVWBGqzquqhpFgzT36J8pgHe4o99C4XE43h dP1SZfHNLHn98uYduuX6feh8KerVUN4L8l7Z4P3ffhQmh5mWmhXUhyk27Jn/wP6OuDjf rmGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301DYDWgM7mBUHJfsfeeef9PB/rJCb6NSO8mvB7taqG4KFXAvSz ZiM8U18+CeH0CMQuv6oqYp9wwzAqkrg5q99J4hmsnp1l X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0HutTaqbQhlX1ukzhsoSt8l6XMgtK6k3V8Ek7vudHinSkuDp8fiWIFEVHr7A/V71EgZ9WyU4q4ZofJwV8yYQ= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1704:: with SMTP id j4mr1154651oii.158.1592441797293; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:56:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87pn9xwrb1.fsf@russet.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <87pn9xwrb1.fsf@russet.org.uk> From: Dev Prabhu Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:56:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about signature file of emacs binaries distribution To: Phillip Lord Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a73b9105a8513fd6" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c; envelope-from=drp.prabhu@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi1-x22c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:43:12 -0400 Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --000000000000a73b9105a8513fd6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thank you. Dev On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, 12:11 PM Phillip Lord wrote: > Dev Prabhu writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I downloaded emacs distribution for windows 64-bit binaries > > (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip) and the associated signature file > > (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip.sig) from the location > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-26/ > > > > My attempt to verify the signature says that the signing certificate has > > expired a few months ago. > > Is it still safe to use this download? > > > Yes. I am considering what to do about the expired key. > > Phil > --000000000000a73b9105a8513fd6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you.
Dev

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020= , 12:11 PM Phillip Lord <p= hillip.lord@russet.org.uk> wrote:
Dev Prabhu <drp.prabhu@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I downloaded emacs distribution for windows 64-bit binaries
> (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip) and the associated signature file
> (emacs-26.3-x86_64.zip.sig) from the location
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/e= macs-26/
>
> My attempt to verify the signature says that the signing certificate h= as
> expired a few months ago.
> Is it still safe to use this download?


Yes. I am considering what to do about the expired key.

Phil
--000000000000a73b9105a8513fd6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 12 20:51:07 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 00:51:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k61SV-0001MP-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:51:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com ([209.85.219.180]:46594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k61SN-0001KD-HV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:51:03 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id x10so2347474ybj.13 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:50:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mZaiFB/hvgmbbWvj7rXB4GiOnQ8z6g4u7AKkoFiqVEg=; b=QDdV2xoGLBg8SnXGQIfV4NxC6/vWW2t/4NAQ1Xsc+2+Ul1EcTn/MleoBjRW5JcWDRM etuZrk9vbaUM4yWL9F+K8IM244O8XCocIzdx/fJ10NDB+wlagIuimrIUJlGNPNnnkhkg ie/v28jU05/hPQ2qjNqMrhYePKoXbps8A+S7+L0MuJrZUhTvArkqqrwCZmj7+V6lW9Vm FQbWpjtOj7QqYxa7BwGCZG9HBeKahD0o5JVHMf8+G5hbz85/erFUcJVf/rCfQMBDJ8w4 e/Tsg+b95lrGiFU9WVIR+BvvX8g0wZurSnP7gZpEh/fos108Ilz37vZ4R2J3KytAZNSM pP8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QlqTCtJWLJDa66nI+fJsLf3wAQB+ULflYMMwo+MG21ZKQq3E1 z3WdDIe8TU6iLggcoAdaQYUTF4RGNcIZCWaWREtkTnR82zY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyg9d+iQMYWb/+Z3RjQl6fFpHvVvdMv+xUoTMooObTMgYV7IJpJudFtlRhODzaPbkzkjYMo4gWdazJWReB1f68= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b290:: with SMTP id k16mr2957515ybj.389.1597279853944; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:50:53 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:50:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: forcemerge 41776 41922 thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.180 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) forcemerge 41776 41922 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 22 15:18:26 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2021 20:18:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l32t0-0000Cy-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:18:26 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l32sx-0000Cf-Mb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:18:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Vf1U1pmgFh4688p9Jy0jidyqm5ebTqCBEnAY99hLHTI=; b=LUsdjfc65QEnLC+6Wbk9veU11C y7WYhHOT48bsqKUbOUE7ufys47+vbXLpQ7skp1MtstxgVTcatnXGdPv6Zjrh7SMu1OQ03ym4gxdwO UdOrMEXWVYg2gw+TpgzAw9RGnvDjnO2ULvkIh0JJe09U6RzL0R9f2H+2Iwo3vBiapVOE=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l32sq-0005Cq-4E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:18:18 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:18:14 +0100 Message-Id: <87v9bowws9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #41776 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 41776 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 41776 quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 12:43:55 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator