GNU bug report logs -
#41897
28.0.50; JavaScript comment filling with mhtml-mode
Previous Next
Reported by: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> runbox.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:10:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 28.0.50
Done: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #50 received at 41897 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 25.06.2020 19:33, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> I imagine that would not be a significant problem for the rare cases
>> that fill-paragraph is called in a JS region. Considering most of the
>> contents in mhtml-mode buffers are not JS code, on average, that should
>> tilt the scales in favor of parsing lazily, rather than affecting every
>> character insertion.
>
> The current patch does parse lazily. You want to remove the benefit of
> using this cache, no matter how small, for reasons I still can't grasp.
That's not true. Like you confirmed, c-fill-paragraph refers to that
cache multiple times. We'll only make sure the cache is reset in the
beginning.
>>> It sounds like you want to use a facility without initialising it.
>>> This feels a bit unreasonable.
>
>> That cache reset at the beginning of js-fill-paragraph could as well
>> re-initialize the cache.
>
> You're misusing the work "initialize" here. If you initialise a variable
> every time you read it, you might as well not have that variable.
Like explained above, not *every* time.
>> It doesn't automatically work in mmm-mode. With my suggestion, it very
>> likely would.
>
> It would work fine with the current patch, together with calls to
> initialise the mechanism. What precisely is the problem in mmm-mode?
That there is no good place to plug in your new functions.
And, in general, to have per-mode before-change-functions contents.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 42 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.